Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Partizipative Demokratie und Politische Partizipation

  • Chapter
Demokratietheorie und Demokratieentwicklung

Zusammenfassung

Politische Partizipation ist in den etablierten Demokratien zu einem Problem geworden. Dies signalisieren empirische Studien, die eine abnehmende Bereitschaft zur politischen Beteiligung feststellen. Für die USA ist dieser negative Trend über eine Reihe von Beteiligungstypen hinweg dokumentiert. Die Zahl derer, die an politischen Wahlen teilnehmen, ist hier ebenso gesunken wie die Mitgliedschaft in politischen Vereinigungen aller Art (Texeira 1992; Putnam 1995; Putnam 2000). In anderen etablierten Demokratien beobachten wir ähnliche Entwicklungen, die allerdings weniger deutlich ausgeprägt sind (Flickinger/Studlar 1992; Dalton 19962: Franklin 2002).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Abromeit, Heidrun (1998), Democracy in Europe, New York, NY/Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, Peter/Areyh Botwinick (1992), Power and Empowerment. A Radical Theory of Participatory Democracy, Philadelphia, Pa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Benjamin (1984), Strong Democracy. Participatory Politics for a New Age, Berkeley, Ca. et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank R./Jack L. Walker (1988), Survey Research and Membership in Voluntary Associations, in: American Journal of Political Science, 32, S. 908–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchstein, Hubertus/Harald Neymanns (Hrsg.) (2002), Online-Wahlen, Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, David/Austin Ranney (Hrsg.) (1994), Referendums around the World — the Growing Use of Direct Democracy, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Angus et al. (1954), The American Voter, Chicago, 111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claeys, Gregory (1987), Justice, Independence and Industrial Democracy: The Development of John Stuart Mill’s Views on Socialism, in: The Journal of Politics, 49, S. 122–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald (1937), The Nature of the Firm, in: Economica, 4, S. 386 – 405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, Stephen (2000), Parliament in the Information Age: The Case of Westminster and Holyrood, Aldershot et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Russell J. (19962), Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Chatham, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Russell J./Wilhelm Bürklin/Andrew Drummond (2001), Public Opinion and Direct Democracy, in: Journal of Democracy, 12, S. 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John S. (1987), Discursive Designs: Critical Theory and Political Institutions, in: American Journal of Political Science, 31, S. 656–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John S. (2000), Deliberative Democracy and Beyond, Oxford/New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, James (1991), Democracy and Deliberation, New Haven, Ct./London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, James (1995), The Voice of the People, New Haven, Ct./London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flickinger, Richard/Donley Studlar (1992), Explaining Declining Turnout in Western European Elections, in: West European Politics, 15, S. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Mark N. (2002), Electoral Participation, in: Lawrence LeDuc/Richard G. Niemi/Pippa Norris (Hrsg.), Comparing Democracies 2: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting, London et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Archon/Erik Olin Wright (2001), Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, in: Politics & Society, 29, S. 5–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhart, Jürgen (2000), Das Plebiszit in der Repräsentativen Demokratie, in: Hans Herbert von Arnim (Hrsg.), Direkte Demokratie, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, Rachel (2001), Elections Online: Assessing Internet-Voting in Light of the Arizona Democratic Primary, in: Political Science Quarterly, 116, S. 561–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1962), Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit, Neuwied.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1968), Erkenntnis und Interesse, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1992), Drei normative Modelle der Demokratie: Zum Begriff deliberativer Politik, in: Herfried Münkler (Hrsg.), Die Chancen der Freiheit. Grundprobleme der Demokratie, München/Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1998), Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaates, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A./Rosemary C.R. Taylor (1996), Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms, in: Political Studies, 44, S. 936–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Philip/John Hudson (1998), The Role of Political Parties: An Analysis based on Transaction Costs, in: Public Choice, 94, S. 125–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kielmansegg, Peter Graf (1977), Volkssouveränität, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kielmansegg, Peter Graf (1988), Das Experiment der Freiheit. Zur gegenwärtigen Lage des demokratischen Verfassungsstaates, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kielmansegg, Peter Graf (1996), Integration und Demokratie, in: Beate Kohler-Koch/Markus Jachtenfuchs (Hrsg.), Europäische Demokratie, Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, Herbert (1996), Demokratietheorie und Veränderungen politischer Beteiligungsformen, in: Forschungsjournal Neue Soziale Bewegungen, 9, S. 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, Beate (1998), The Evolution and Transformation of European Governance, Institut für Höhere Studien, Reihe Politikwissenschaft Nr. 58, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubicek, Herbert (1996), Allgemeiner Zugang und informatielle Grundversorgung, in: Jörg Tauss/Johannes Kollbeck/Jan Mönikes (Hrsg.), Deutschlands Weg in die Informationsgesellschaft. Herausforderungen und Perspektiven für Wirtschaft, Recht und Politik, Baden-Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luskin, Robert C./James S. Fishkin/Roger Jowell (2002), Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in Britain, in: British Journal of Political Science, 32, S. 455–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaverty, Peter (Hrsg.) (2002), Public Participation and Innovations in Community Governance, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menegat, R. (2002), Participatory Democracy and Sustainable Development: Integrated Urban Environmental Management in Porto Alegre, Brazil, in: Environment and Urbanization, 14, S. 181–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möckli, Silvano (1994), Direkte Demokratie. Ein internationaler Vergleich, Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, Catherine (2001), Electronic Consultation in the UK and the USA — Electronic Democracy beyond the Vote, paper for presentation at the 2001 Joint Workshops session, Grenoble, 6–11 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa (2001), Making Democracies Work: Social Capital and Civic Engagement in 47 Societies, Paper for the European Science Foundation EURESCO Conference on Social Capital: Interdisciplinary Perspectives at the University of Exeter, 15–20 September 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordeshook, Peter C. (1995), Institutions and Incentives, in: Journal for Democracy, 6, S. 46–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, Carole (1970), Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pharr, Susan J./Robert Putnam/Russell J. Dalton (2000), Trouble in the Advanced Democracies? A Quarter-Century of Declining Confidence, in: Journal of Democracy, 11, S. 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse, Jan Nederveen (2001), Participatory Democratization Reconceived, in: Futures 33, S. 407–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poster, Mark (1995), The Second Media Age, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. (1995), Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital, in: Journal of Democracy, 6, p. 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold, Howard (1993), The Virtual Community. Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier, Reading, Ma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, William H./Ordeshook, Peter C. (1968), A Theory of the Calculus of Voting, in: American Political Science Review, 62, S. 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstone, Steven J./John Mark Hansen (1993), Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni (1970), Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics, in: The American Political Science Review, 64, S. 1033–1053.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni (1987), The Theory of Democracy Revisited, 2 Bde., Chatham, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarrow, Susan E. (2001), Direct Democracy and Institutional Change. A Comparative Investigation, in: Comparative Political Studies, 34, S. 651–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda (1999), Advocates without Members: The Recent Transformation of American Civil Life, in: Theda Skocpol/Morris P. Fiorina (Hrsg.), Civic Engagement in American Democracy, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sola Pool, Ithiel de (1983), Technologies of Freedom. On Free Speech in the Information Age, Cambridge, Ma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedish Ministry of Justice (2000), Sustainable Democracy. Policy for Government by the People in the 2000s. Report of the Government Commission on Swedish Democracy. Official Government Reports-SOU 2000:1 (English translation 12 September 2000 of the recommendations made by the government commission on Swedish democracy in their final report).

    Google Scholar 

  • Texeira, Ruy A. (1992), The Disappearing American Voter, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney/Norman Nie (1972), Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Jack L. (1966), A Critiqü of the Elitist Theory of Democracy, in: American Political Science Review, 60, S. 285–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Mark E. (1993), Can Participatory Democracy Produce Better Selves? Psychological Dimensions of Habermas’s Discursive Model of Democracy, in: Political Psychology, 14, S. 209–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, Barry R./U.J. Marschall (1988), The industrial Organization of Congress: Or Why Legislatures, like Firms, are not Organized as Markets, in: Journal of Political Economy, 96, S. 132–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, Anthony (2000), Democracy in the Digital Age, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. /Scott E. Masten (Hrsg.) (1999), The Economics of Transaction Costs, Cheltenham/Northampton, Ma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winther, G./ R. Marens (1997), Participatory Democracy may go a Long Way: Comparative Growth Performance of Employee Ownership Firms in New York and Washington State, in: Economic and Industrial Democracy, 18, S. 393–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, Donald (1989), Why Democracies produce Efficient Results, in: Journal of Political Economy, 97, S. 1395–1428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, Joel (1985), A Defense of Participatory Democracy, in: Review of Politics, 47

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillessen, Horst/Peter C. Dienel/Wendelin Strubelt (Hrsg.) (1993), Die Modernisierung der Demokratie: Internationale Ansätze, Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweifel, Thomas D. (2002), Democratic Deficit. The European Union, Switzerland, and the United States in Comparative Perspective, Lanham et al.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Thomas Zittel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

André Kaiser Thomas Zittel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zittel, T. (2004). Partizipative Demokratie und Politische Partizipation. In: Kaiser, A., Zittel, T. (eds) Demokratietheorie und Demokratieentwicklung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80506-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80506-5_3

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-14118-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-80506-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation