Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

WordNet: Ein semantisches Netz als Bedeutungstheorie

  • Chapter
Bedeutung · Konzepte Bedeutungskonzepte

Part of the book series: Psycholinguistische Studien

Zusammenfassung

Semantische Netze sind eine von mehreren Möglichkeiten, intensionale Bedeutungen darzustellen. Daher können sie als eine konkurrierende Theorie zu Prototyp-Analysen, Merkmals- und Komponentenanalysen sowie zu mentalen Modellen und traditionellen Wörterbüchern angesehen werden. Im folgenden werden an Hand der lexikalischen Datenbank “WordNet” die Grundidee und das Design eines semantischen Netzes erläutert, wobei eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit den Kategorien “Wort”, “Begriff” und “Bedeutung” erfolgt. Dabei wird die Rolle dieser Kategorien in einem semantischen Netz mit ihrer Behandlung in anderen Begriffs- und Bedeutungsanalysen verglichen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Amsler, R (1980). The structure of the Merriam-Webster Pocket Dictionary. Unveröffentlichte Ph. D. Dissertation in Computer Science, University of Texas, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apresjan, J. D. (1974). Regular polysemy. Linguistics, 142,5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierwisch, M. (1983). Semantische und konzeptuelle Repräsentation lexikalischer Einheiten. In R. Ruzicka & W. Motsch (Hrsg.), Untersuchungen zur Semantik (S. 611–699) (= Studia Grammatica XXII). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin, R. (1992). The concept of a semantic relation. In A. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (Hrsg.), Frames, fields, and contrasts (S. 253–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin, R, Herrmann, D. J. & Winston, M. (1988). An empirical taxonomy of part-whole relations: Effects of part-whole relation type on relation identification. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3,17–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, M., Byrd, R & Heidorn, G. (1985). Extracting semantic hierarchies from a large online dictionary. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (S. 299–304).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1972). Studies on semantics in Generative Grammar. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruse, D. A. (1992). Antonymy revisited: Some thoughts on the relationship between words and concepts. In A. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (Hrsg.), Frames, fields, and concepts (S. 289–306). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deese, J. (1964). The associative structure of some English adjectives. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deese, J. (1965). The structure of associations in language and thought. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evens, M. (Hrsg.). (1988). Relational models of the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellbaum, C. (1990). The English verb lexicon as a semantic net. International Journal of Lexicography, 3,278–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellbaum, C. (1995). Cooccurrence and antonymy. International Journal of Lexicography, 8, 281–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellbaum, C. (in Druck). A semantic network of English verbs. In C. Fellbaum (Hrsg.), WordNet: An on-line lexical reference system and some of its applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellbaum, C. & Kegl, J. (1988). Taxonomic hierarchies in the verb lexicon. Vortrag, gehalten auf dem EURALEX Third International Congress, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellbaum, C. & Kegl, J. (1989). Taxonomic structures and cross-category linking in the lexicon. In K. de Jong & Y. No (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the Sixth Eastern State Conference on Linguistics (S. 94–103). Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellbaum, C. & Miller, G. A. (1990). Folk psychology or semantic entailment? A reply to Rips and Conrad. Psychological Review, 97,565–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C. H., Gleitman, H. & Gleitman, L. R. (1991). On the semantic content of subcategorization frames. Cognitive Psychology, 23,331–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, L. R. (1990). The structural sources of verb meaning. Language Acquisition, 1, 3–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, D., Fischer, U. & Miller, G. A. (1989). The organization of adjectival meanings. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 92–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, D. & Miller, K. J. (1990). Adjectives in Word Net. International Journal of Lexicography, 3, 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. (1976). Lexical structures in syntax and semantics. New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, K. & Keyser, S. (1987). A view from the middle (Lexicon Project Working Papers 10). Cambridge, MA: Center for Cognitive Science, MIT. Hale, K. & Laughren, M. (1983). The structure of verbal entries: Preface to dictionary entries of verbs. Cambridge, MA: Warlpiri Lexicon Project, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (1989). Morphology, pragmatics, and the un-verb. In J. Powers & K de Jong (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the Fifth Eastern State Conference on Linguistics (S. 210–233). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. S. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justeson J. S. & Katz S. M. 1991a. Co-occurrences of antonymous adjectives and their contexts. Computational Linguistics 17,1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Justeson, J. S. & Katz, S. M. (1991b). Redefining antonymy: The textual structure of a semantic relation. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the UW Centre for the New OED (S. 138–154). Waterloo, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. J. (1972). Semantic theory. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. J. & Fodor, J. (1963). The structure of a semantic theory. Language, 39,170–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1970). Irregularity in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. & Rapoport, T. (1988). Lexical subordination. In L. MacLeod et al. (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 24 Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (S. 275–289).

    Google Scholar 

  • Melcuk, I. & Zholkovsky, A. (1988). Explanatory combinatorial dictionary of modern Russian. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1995). Wörter — Streifzüge durch die Psycholinguistik. Frankfurt: Zweitausendeins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunberg, G. (1978). The pragmatics of reference. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostler, N. & Atkins, B. T. (1991). Predictable meaning shifts: Some linguistic properties of lexical implication rules. In J. Pustejovski & S. Bergler (Hrsg.), Lexical semantics and knowledge representation (ACL SIGLEX Workshop) (S. 76–87). University of California at Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1994). How could a child use verb syntax to learn verb semantics? Lingua, 92,377–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovski, J. (1991). The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics, 17,409–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovski, J. (1995). The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Hrsg.), Language typology and syntactic description (Vol. 3) (S. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, A. (1985). Lexicography and conceptual analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Christiane Fellbaum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Joachim Grabowski Gisela Harras Theo Herrmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fellbaum, C. (1996). WordNet: Ein semantisches Netz als Bedeutungstheorie. In: Grabowski, J., Harras, G., Herrmann, T. (eds) Bedeutung · Konzepte Bedeutungskonzepte. Psycholinguistische Studien. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-86544-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-86544-1_8

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-12757-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-86544-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation