Skip to main content

Necessarily Unrepresentative Political Parties

  • Chapter
Bürger und Demokratie in Ost und West

Abstract

No matter what model of representative democracy we subscribe to, if it includes political parties, as most models do, it is obvious that the functions and performances of parties are one of the most contentious components of the model, normatively as well as empirically. Different models require parties to function differently. But irrespective of model, whether we deal with mandate theory, accountability theory, or deliberative theory, just to mention three in-vogue models of democracy, the delineation of different party functions overflows. Specifying party functions is getting to be a growth industry of its own within political science. The literature is replete with enummerations of different party functions (Key 1964; Sjöblom 1968; Strøm and Svåsand 1997; Widfeldt 1999; Dalton and Wattenberg 2000; Petersson 2000). Nothing wrong with that. Important problems breed a multiplicity of ideas, and maybe also conflictuous ideas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brothén, Martin (1999): Riksdagskandidat 1998. Dokumentation. Göteborg: Statsvetenskap-liga Institutionen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip and Roy Pierce (1986): Political Representation in France. Cambridge: The Belnap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Russell J. and Martin P. Wattenberg (eds.) (2000): Parties Without Partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esaiasson, Peter and Knut Heidar (eds.) (2000): Beyond Westminster and Congress. The Nordic Experience. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esaiasson, Peter and Sören Holmberg (1996): Representation from Above. Members of Parliament and Representative Democracy in Sweden. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilljam, Mikael (1988): Svenska folket och löntagarfonderna. En Studie i politisk opinions-bildning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, Sören (1974): Riksdagen representerar svenska folket. Empiriska studier i repre-sentativ demokrati. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, Sören (1981): Svenska väljare. Stockholm: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, Sören (1989): Political Representation in Sweden. In: Scandinavian Political Studies, 12, pp. 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, Sören (1994): Election Studies the Swedish Way. In: European Journal of Political Research, 25, pp. 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, Sören (1996): Svensk åsiktsöverensstämmelse. In: Bo Rothstein and Bo Särlvik (eds.): Vetenskapen om politik. Festskrift till professor emeritus Jörgen Westerstâhl. Göteborg: Statsvetenskapliga Institutionen, pp. 109–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, Sören (1997): Dynamic Opinion Representation. In: Scandinavian Political Studies, 20, pp. 265–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, Sören (1999): Collective Policy Congruence Compared. In: Warren E. Miller, Roy Pierce, Jacques Thomassen, Richard Herrera, Sören Holmberg, Peter Esaiasson and Bernhard Wessels: Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 87–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, Sören (2000): Issue Agreement. In: Peter Esaiasson and Knut Heidar (eds.): Beyond Westminster and Congress. The Nordic Experience. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 155–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, Valdimer O. (1964): Politics, Parties and Pressure Groups. New York: Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Kay (ed.) (1980): Political Parties and Linkage: A Comparative Perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, Ian (1991): Party Elites, Voters and Political Attitudes: Testing Three Explanations for Mass-elite Differences. In: Canadian Journal of Political Science, 24, pp. 237–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medding, Peter (1982): Ruling Elite Models: A Critique and an Alternative. In: Political Studies, 33, pp. 393–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren E., Roy Pierce, Jacques Thomassen, Richard Herrera, Sören Holmberg, Peter Esaiasson and Bernhard Wessels (1999): Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren and Donald Stokes (1963): Constituence Influence in Congress. In: American Political Science Review, 57, pp. 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oscarsson, Henrik (1998): Den svenska partirymden. Väljarnas uppfattning om konfliktstrukturen i partisystemet 1956–1996. Göteborg: Statsvetenskapliga Institutionen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersson, Olof (ed.) (2000): Demokratirådets rapport 2000. Demokrati utan partier? Stockholm: SNS förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinovitz, George and Stuart Macdonald (1989): A Directional Theory of Issue Voting. In: American Political Science Review, 83, pp. 93–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinovitz, George, Stuart Macdonald, and Ola Listhaug (1991): New Players in an Old Game: Party Strategy in Multiparty Systems. In: Comparative Political Studies, 24, pp. 147–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni (1976): Parties and Party Systems: A Framework of Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Särlvik, Bo (1970): Electoral Behaviour in the Swedish Multiparty System. Göteborg: Statsvetenskapligainstitutionen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöblom, Gunnar (1968): Party Strategies in a Multiparty System. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strom, Kaare and Lars Svåsand (eds.) (1997): Challenges to Political Parties: The Case of Norway. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen, Jacques (1976): Kiezens en gekozen in een representatieve demokratie. Alphen aan den Rijk: Samson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, Bernhard (1995): Support for Integration: Elite or Mass Driven? In: Oskar Nied-ermayer and Richard Sinnott (eds.): Public Opinion and Internationalized Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 137–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, Bernhard (1999): System Characteristics Matter. Empirical Evidence from Ten Representation Studies. In: Warren E. Miller, Roy Pierce, Jacques Thomassen, Richard Herrera, Sören Holmberg, Peter Esaiasson and Bernhard Wessels: Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 137–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widfeldt, Anders (1999): Linking Parties with People. Party Membership in Sweden 1960–1997. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Dieter Fuchs Edeltraud Roller Bernhard Weßels

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holmberg, S. (2002). Necessarily Unrepresentative Political Parties. In: Fuchs, D., Roller, E., Weßels, B. (eds) Bürger und Demokratie in Ost und West. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89596-7_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89596-7_26

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-13641-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-89596-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics