Skip to main content

Die konversationeile Konstruktion von Ungleichheit in Fernsehgesprächen

Zur Produktion von kulturellem Geschlecht

  • Chapter
Die Geschlechter im Gespräch

Zusammenfassung

Ich beschäftige mich in diesem Artikel mit zwei Fernsehdiskussionen, die im österreichischen 2. Programm vor etwa vier Jahren ausgestrahlt wurden. Diese Diskussionsrunden des »Club 2« haben eine lange Tradition und erfreuen sich im österreichischen, schweizerischen und süddeutschen Raum großer Beliebtheit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Auer, Peter (1986): Kontextualisierung. Studium Linguistik 19: 22–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Adrian (1981): Interruptions and interpretation in conversation. Discourse Processes 4: 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, Jörg (1982): Schweigephasen im Gespräch — Aspekte ihrer interaktiven Organisation. In: Hans-Georg Soeffner (Hrsg.): Beiträge zu einer empirischen Sprachsoziologie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, Jörg (1988): Ethnomethodologie und Konversationsanalyse. Fernuniversität Hagen. Studienbriefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne/Matthews, Wendy (1979): He&She: How children develop their sex role identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Penelope/Levinson, Stephen (1978): Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena. In: esther Goody (ed.): Questions and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condry, Sarah/Condry, John (1976): Sex differences: a study of the eye of the beholder. Child Development 47: 812–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook-Gumperz, Jenny/Gumperz, John (1976): Context in children’s speech. Papers on language and contxt. Working papers nr. 48. Berkeley: Language Behaviour Research Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelsky, Carole (1981): Who’s got the floor? Language in Society 10: 383–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders-Dragässer, Uta/Fuchs, Claudia (1989): Interaktionen der Geschlechter. Sexismusstrukturen in der Schule. Weinheim und München: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, Frederick/Shultz, Jeffrey (1982): The counselor as gatekeeper. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenstermaker, Sarah/West, Candace/Zimmerman, Don (1991): Gender Inequality. In: Gender, Familiy, and Economy. The Triple Overlap. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving (1971): Interaktionsrituale. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving (1974/1977): Rahmenanalyse. Ein Versuch über die Organisation von Alltagserfahrung. Franfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Marjorie H.: (1980): Directive-response speech sequences in girls’ and boys’ task activities. In: Sally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker, and Nelly Furman (eds.): Women and Language in Literature and Society. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1988): Cooperation and competition across girls’ play activities. In: Alexandra D. Todd and Sue Fisher (eds.): Gender and Discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1990): Tactical uses of stories: participant frameworks within girls’ and boys’ disputes. Discourse Processes 13: 33–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gräßel, Ulrike (1991): Sprachverhalten und Geschlecht. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Günthner, Susanne/Kotthoff, Helga (eds.) (1991). Von fremden Stimmen. Weibliches und männliches Sprechen im Kulturvergleich. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz, John (1982): Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Adelaide (1979): The Acquisition of Genderlect. Annals of the New York Acedemy of Science 327: 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Susan (1975): Women and words in a Spanish village. In: R. Reiter (ed.): Towards an anthropology of women. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, Jennifer (1990): Das Schweigen der Experten und das Schweigen der Laien. OBST 42: 124–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Christian (1988): Embarrassment and Interactional Organization. In: Paul Drew/Anthony Wootton (eds.): Erving Goffman. Exploring the Interaction Order. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, Nancy (1977): Body Politics. Power, Sex, and Nonverbal Communication. Englewood-Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Fern/Aries, Elisabeth (1983): The Talk of Women Friends. Women’s Studies International Forum 6,4: 353–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keppler, Angela (1989): Schritt für Schritt. Das Verfahren alltäglicher Belehrungen. Soziale Welt 4: 538–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppler, Angela/Luckmann, Thomas (1991): ›Teaching‹: Conversational Transmission of Knowledge. In: Ivana Markova/Klaus Foppa (eds.): Dynamics of dialogue. Hempstead: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotthoff, Helga (1991): Interaktionsstilistische Unterschiede im Gesprächsverhalten der Geschlechter. In Neuland, Eva/Bleckwehn, Helga (eds.): Stil-Stilistik-Stilisierung. Frankfurt/New York/Paris/Bern: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotthoff, Helga (forthcoming): The social meaning of interruption in mixed-sex discourse: competition or involvement? Kramarae, Cheris/Schulz, Muriel/O’Barr, William (eds.) (1984): Language and power. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, William (1972): Rules for ritual insults. In: Thomas Kochman (ed.): Rappin’in and stylin’ out. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leet-Pellegrini, Helena (1980): Conversational dominance as a function of gender and expertise. In: Howard Giles/Peter Robinson/Phillip M. Smith (eds.): Language. Social Psychological Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lever, Janet (1976): Sex differences in the games children play. Social Problems 23: 478–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lever, Janet (1978): Sex differences in the complexity of children’s play and games. American Sociological Review 43.471–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linke, Angelika (1985): Gespräche im Fernsehen. Bern/Frankfurt/New York: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitz, Daniel/Borker, Ruth (1982/1991): Mißverständnisse zwischen Männern und Frauen — kulturell betrachtet. In: Susanne Günthner/Helga Kotthoff (eds.): Von fremden Stimmen. Weibliches und männliches Sprechen im Kulturvergleich. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, Paul (1979): The role of laughter and humor in growing up female. In: Claire Kopp (ed.): Becoming female. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meditch, Andrea (1975): The development of sex-specific speech patterns in young children. Anthropological Linguistics 17: 421–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthaler, Lynelle (1990): A study of group process: who’s got WHAT floor? Journal of Pragmatics 14: 537–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Klaus (1984): Rahmenanalyse des Dialogs. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Susan U./Steele, Susan/Tanz, Christine (eds.): Language, gender and sex in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, Harvey (1972): Lesson 5. April 18. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, Harvey/Schegloff, Emanuel/Jefferson, Gail (1974): A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50: 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandig, Barbara (1986): Stilistik der deutschen Sprache. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann, Joan (1989): Talk controll: an illustration from the classroom of problems in analysing male dominance of conversation. In: Jennifer Coates/Deborah Cameron( eds.): Women in their speech communities. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, Deborah (1990): Gender Differences in Topical Coherence: Creating Involvement in Best Friend’s Talk. Discourse Processes 13: 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannen (1990/1991): Du kannst mich einfach nicht verstehen. Hamburg: Kabel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, Barrie/Henley, Nancy/Kramarae, Cheris (1983): Language, gender and society. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trömel-Plötz, Senta (Hrsg.)(1984): Gewalt durch Sprache. Frankfurt: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Candace/Zimmerman, Don (1983): Small insults: a study of interruption in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In: Thorene, Barrie/Henley, Nancy/Kramarae, Cheris (eds.): Language, gender and society. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Candace/Zimmerman, Don H. (1987): Conversation Analysis. In: Klaus R. Scherer/Paul Ekman (eds.): Handbook of Methods in Nonverbal Behaviour Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, Ruth (1981): Women relate, men report. Journal of Pragmatics 5: 261–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, Ruth (1988): Sprache in Institutionen. In: Ullrich Ammon/Norbert Dittmar/Klaus Mattheier (eds.): Sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kotthoff, H. (1992). Die konversationeile Konstruktion von Ungleichheit in Fernsehgesprächen. In: Die Geschlechter im Gespräch. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03400-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03400-7_12

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-476-00825-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-476-03400-7

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics