Skip to main content

Tree-Like Parallelization of Reduct and Construct Computation

  • Conference paper
Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing (RSCTC 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3066))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper addresses the problem of parallel computing in reduct/construct generation. The reducts are subsets of attributes that may be successfully applied in information/decision table analysis. Constructs, defined in a similar way, represent a notion that is a kind of generalization of the reduct. They ensure both discernibility between pairs of objects belonging to different classes (in which they follow the reducts) as well as similarity between pairs of objects belonging to the same class (which is not the case with reducts). Unfortunately, exhaustive sets of minimal constructs, similarly to sets of minimal reducts, are NP-hard to generate. To speed up the computations, decomposing the original task into multiple subtasks and executing these in parallel is employed. The paper presents a so-called constrained tree-like model of parallelization of this task and illustrates practical behaviour of this algorithm in a computational experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akl, S.G.: The Design and Analysis of Parallel Algorithms. Prentice Hall International, Inc., Eaglewood Cliffs (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bazan, J., Skowron, A., Synak, P.: Dynamic Reducts as a Tool for Extracting Laws from Decision Tables. In: Raś, Z.W., Zemankova, M. (eds.) ISMIS 1994. LNCS, vol. 869, pp. 346–355. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dash, M., Liu, H.: Feature Selection for Classification. Intelligent Data Analysis (on-line journal) 1(3) (1997), http://www-east.elsevier.com/ida

  4. Flinkman, M., Michalowski, W., Nilsson, S., Słowiński, R., Susmaga, R., Wilk, S.: Use of rough sets analysis to classify Siberian forest ecosystem according to net primary production of phytomass. INFOR 38(3), 145–161 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kohavi, R., Frasca, B.: Useful Feature Subsets and Rough Set Reducts. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Rough Sets and Soft Computing, San Jose State University, San Jose (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Murphy, P.M., Aha, D.W.: UCI Repository of Machine Learning Databases. Department of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine (1992), WWW http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn e-mail: ml-repository@ics.uci.edu

  7. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Skowron, A., Rauszer, C.: The Discernibility Functions Matrices and Functions in Information Systems. In: Slowinski, R. (ed.) Intelligent Decision Support. Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Set Theory, pp. 331–362. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Susmaga, R.: Experiments in Incremental Computation of Reducts. In: Skowron, A., Polkowski, L. (eds.) Rough Sets in Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Springer, Berlin (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Susmaga, R.: Parallel Computation of Reducts. In: Polkowski, L., Skowron, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, Warsaw, pp. 450–457. Springer, Berlin (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Susmaga, R.: Effective Tests for Inclusion Minimality in Reduct Generation. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 23(4), 219–240 (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Susmaga, R.: Tree-Like Parallelization of Reduct and Construct Computation, Research Report RA-009/03, Poznań University of Technology, Poznań (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tannhäuser, M.: Efficient Reduct Computation (in Polish), M. Sc. Thesis, Institute of Mathematics, Warsaw University, Warsaw (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wroblewski, J.: Covering with Reducts – A Fast Algorithm for Rule Generation. In: Polkowski, L., Skowron, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, Warsaw, pp. 402–407. Springer, Berlin (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Susmaga, R. (2004). Tree-Like Parallelization of Reduct and Construct Computation. In: Tsumoto, S., Słowiński, R., Komorowski, J., Grzymała-Busse, J.W. (eds) Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing. RSCTC 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3066. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25929-9_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25929-9_54

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22117-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25929-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics