Abstract
When plant tissue is abiotically injured by crushing, cutting, heat-wounding, electrical stimulation, or by several other means, the injured (perceiving) tissue generates electrical signals (action potentials and variation potentials) and transmits them to distant (responding) tissue. Here they evoke apparently disparate responses, such as callose formation, closing of plasmodesmata, stoppage of cytoplasmic streaming, inhibition of ribosome movement along messenger RNA (mRNA), and ultrarapid but transient accumulation of over 100 transcripts, which are degraded without being translated. These apparently disparate responses can be reconciled by one fundamental hypothesis that assumes that “the plant does not know what hit it” and thus “expecting the worst” mounts a holistic defense response against its most potent nemesis, a putative viral invasion. We postulate that the basis for this response is calcium influx into the cytoplasm via voltage-gated channels (action potential) associated with the microtubules, or via mechano-sensitive channels (variation potential) associated with microfilaments. The calcium interacts with calcium and/or calmodulin-dependent cytoskeleton-associated protein kinases. This causes the phosphorylation of myosin, which stops cytoplasmic streaming, and of elongation factor 2F, which slows elongation and termination and causes ribosomes to pile up on polyribosomes. This decreases protein synthesis, but protects preexisting “host” transcripts from degradation. The phosphorylation signal then passes into the nucleus, where it phosphorylates RNA polymerase II, which goes into overdrive (i.e., does not stop at accuracy checkpoints), thus causing the synthesis of large amounts of mismade mRNA. The mRNA is transported into the cytoplasm, where it is scanned (checked for accuracy) by ribosomes, and found to be incorrect. This surveillance mechanism stimulates ribonuclease activity, which degrades the free (non-polysome-associated), mismade RNA, but leaves the original, “host” transcripts unscathed since they are protected by ribosomes. The ribonuclease also (and here is the crux of the matter) attacks other free mRNAs, including viral mRNAs, so these are disposed of before they can be translated. Within minutes this reaction is over, cytoplasmic steaming resumes, translation continues, ribosomes are released and so can be used to translate new (correctly made) transcripts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abler ML, Green PJ (1996) Control of mRNA stability in higher plants. Plant Mol Biol 32:63–71
Beelman CA, Parker R (1995) Degradation of mRNA in eukaryotes. Cell 81:179–183
Coker JS, Vian A, Davies E (2005) Identification, accumulation, and functional prediction of novel tomato transcripts systemically up-regulated after flame-wounding. Physiol Plant 124:311–322
Cole CN (2000) mRNA export: the long and winding road. Nat Cell Biol 2:E55–E58
Cornelissen M (1989) Nuclear and cytoplasmic sites for anti-sense control. Nucl Acids Res 17:7203–7209
Cullen BR (2000) Connections between the processing and nuclear export of mRNA: evidence for an export license. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:46–54
Davies E (1987a) Wound responses in plants. Biochem Plants 12:243–264
Davies E (1987b) Action potentials as multi-functional signals in plants: A hypothesis attempting to unify apparently disparate wound responses. Plant Cell Environ 10:623–631
Davies E (1990) Plant wound signals and translation. In: Proceedings of the 13th international congress on plant growth substances, pp 519–530
Davies E (1993) Intercellular and intracellular signals in plants and their transduction via the membrane-cytoskeleton interface. Semin Cell Biol 4:139–147
Davies E (2004) Commentary: new functions for electrical signals in plants. New Phytol 161:607–610
Davies E, Larkins BA (1974) Polyribosome degradation as a sensitive assay for endolytic messenger ribonuclease activity. Anal Biochem 61:155–164
Davies E, Schuster A (981) Intercellular communication in plants: evidence for a rapidly-generated, bidirectionally-transmitted wound signal. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:2422–2426
Davies E, Ramaiah KVA, Abe S (1986) Wounding inhibits protein synthesis yet stimulates polysome formation in aged, excised pea epicotyls. Plant Cell Physiol 27:1377–1386
Davies E, Zawadzki T, Witters D (1991) Electrical activity and signal transmission in plants: how do plants know? In: Penel C, Greppin H (eds) Plant signaling, plasma membrane and change of state. University of Geneva, Switzerland, pp 119–137
Davies E, Fillingham BD, Abe S (1996) The plant cytoskeleton. In: Hesketh JE, Pryme LF (eds) The cytoskeleton, vol 3. JAI, Greenwich, CT, pp 405–449
Davies E, Vian A, Vian C, Stankovic B (1997) Rapid systemic up-regulation of genes after heat-wounding and electrical stimulation. Acta Physiol Plant 19:571–576
Davies E, Abe S, Larkins BA, Clore AM, Quatrano RS, Weidner S (1998) The role of the cytoskeleton in plant protein synthesis. In: Bailey-Serres J, Gallie DR (eds) A look beyond transcription: mechanisms determining mRNA stability and translation in plants. American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD, pp 115–124
Davies E, Shimps B, Brown K, Stankovic B (1999) Gravity, stress, calcium and gene expression. J Gravitat Physiol 6:21–22
Davies E, Stankovic B, Azama S, Shibata K, Abe S (2001) Novel components of the plant cytoskeleton: a beginning to plant “cytomics”. Plant Sci 160:185–196
Fisahn J, Herde O, Willmitzer L, Pena-Cortez H (2004) Analysis of the transient increase in cytosolic Ca2+ during the action potential of higher plants with high temporal resolution: requirement of Ca2+ transients for induction of jasmonic acid biosynthesis and PINII gene expression. Plant Cell Physiol 45:456–459
Gutierrez RA, Ewing RM, Cherry JM, Green PJ (2002) Identification of unstable transcripts in Arabidopsis by cDNA microarray analysis: rapid decay is associated with a group of touch-and specific clock-controlled genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11513–11518
Heilmann I, Perera IY, Stevenson JM, Boss WF (2001) Sense and sensibility: inositol phospholipids as mediators of abiotic stress responses. In: Cherry JH et al. (eds) Plant tolerance to abiotic stresses in agriculture: role of genetic engineering. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 285–296
Hentze MW, Kulozik AE (1999) A perfect message: RNA surveillance and nonsense-mediated decay. Cell 96:307–310
Hofmann WA et al. (2004) Actin is part of the pre-initiation complexes and is necessary for transcription by RNA polymerase II. Nat Cell Biol 6:1094–1101
Kozak M (1992) Regulation of translation in eukaryotic systems. Annu Rev Cell Biol 8:197–225
Landick R (1999) Shifting RNA polymerase into overdrive. Science 284:598–599
Larkins BA, Davies E (1973) Polyribosomes from peas III: stimulation of polysome degradation by exogenous and endogenous calcium. Plant Physiol 52:655–659
LeBrasseur ND, MacIntosh GC, Perez-Amador MA, Saitch M, Green PJ (2002) Local and systemic wound-induction of RNase and nuclease activities in Arabidopsis: RNS1 as a marker for a JA-independent systemic signaling pathway. Plant J 29:393–403
Malone M (1996) Rapid, long-distance signal transmission in higher plants. In: Callow JA (ed) Advances in botanical research. Academic, San Diego, pp 163–228
Ramaiah KVA, Davies E (1985) Wounding of aged pea epicotyls enhances the reinitiating ability of isolated ribosomes. Plant Cell Physiol 26:1223–1231
Ryazanov AG, Shestakova EA, Natapov PG (1988) Phosphorylation of elongation factor 2 by EF-2 kinase affects rate of translation. Nature 334:170–173
Salinas-Mondragón R, Atkinson CA, Davies E (2001) Ultra-rapid wound responses in plants: changes in inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and gene expression. Poster presented at Plant Biology 2001, 21–25 July 2001, Providence, RI, USA. Abstract 686, http://abstracts.aspb.org/pb2001/public/P45/0230.html
Schuster A, Davies E (1983) Protein and RNA metabolism in pea epicotyls. II. The response to wounding. Plant Physiol 73:817–821
Shestakova EA, Motoz LP, Minin AA, Gelfand VI, Gavrilova LP (1991) Some of the eukaryotic elongation factor 2 is co-localized with actin microfilament bundles in mouse embryo fibroblasts. Cell Biol Int Rep 15:75–84
Stankovic B, Davies E (1996) Both action potentials and variation potentials induce proteinase inhibitor gene expression in tomato. FEBS Lett 390:275–279
Stankovic B, Davies E (1997a) Intercellular communication in plants: electrical stimulation of proteinase inhibitor gene expression in tomato. Planta 202:402–406
Stankovic B, Davies E (1997b) Wounding evokes rapid changes in tissue deformation, electrical potential, transcription, and translation in tomato. Plant Cell Physiol 39:268–274
Stankovic B, Zawadzki T, Davies E (1997) Characterization of the variation potential in sunflower. Plant Physiol 115:1083–1088
Stankovic B, Witters DL, Zawadzki T, Davies E (1998) Action potentials and variation potentials in sunflower: an analysis of their relationships and distinguishing characteristics. Physiol Plant 105:51–58
Stankovic B, Vian A, Henry-Vian C, Davies E (2000) Molecular cloning and characterization of a tomato cDNA encoding a systemically wound-inducible bZIP DNA-binding protein. Planta 212:60–66
Thuleau P, Schroder JL, Ranjeva R (1998) Recent advances in the regulation of plant calcium channels: evidence for regulation of G-proteins, the cytoskeleton and second messengers. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1:424–427
Wang YF, Fan L-M, Zhang W-Z, Zhang W, Wu W-H (2004) Ca2+-permeable channels in the plasma membrane of Arabidopsis pollen are regulated by actin microfilaments. Plant Physiol 136:3892–3904
York JD, Odom AR, Murphy R, Ives EB, Wente SR (1999) A phospholipase C-dependent inositol polyphosphate kinase pathway required for efficient mRNA export. Science 285:96–100
Zawadzki T, Davies E, Dziubinska H, Trebacz K (1991) Characteristics of action potentials in Helianthus annuus L. Physiol Plant 83:601–604
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davies, E., Stankovic, B. (2006). Electrical Signals, the Cytoskeleton, and Gene Expression: a Hypothesis on the Coherence of the Cellular Responses to Environmental Insult. In: Baluška, F., Mancuso, S., Volkmann, D. (eds) Communication in Plants. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28516-8_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28516-8_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28475-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28516-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)