Skip to main content

Formal Consistency Verification of Deliberative Agents with Respect to Communication Protocols

  • Conference paper
Formal Approaches to Agent-Based Systems (FAABS 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3228))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show a method that is able to detect inconsistencies in the reasoning carried out by a deliberative agent. The agent is supposed to be provided with a hybrid Knowledge Base expressed in a language called CCR-2, based on production rules and hierarchies of frames, which permits the representation of non-monotonic reasoning, uncertain reasoning and arithmetic constraints in the rules. The method can give a specification of the scenarios in which the agent would deduce an inconsistency. We define a scenario to be a description of the initial agent’s state (in the agent life cycle), a deductive tree of rule firings, and a partially ordered set of messages and/or stimuli that the agent must receive from other agents and/or the environment. Moreover, the method will make sure that the scenarios will be valid w.r.t. the communication protocols in which the agent is involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. de Kleer, J.: An assumption based TMS. Artificial Intelligence 28, 127–162 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rousset, M.: On the consistency of knowledge bases: The COVADIS system. In: Rousset, M. (ed.) Proceedings ECAI 1988, Munich, Alemania, pp. 79–84 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ginsberg, A.: Knowledge-base reduction: A new approach to checking knowledge bases for inconsistency and redundancy. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 1988, pp. 585–589 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Antonio, A.: Sistema para la verificación estructural y detección de inconsistencies en bases de conocimientos. In: de Antonio, A. (ed.) Final year project, Facultad de Informática, UPM (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meseguer, P.: Incremental verification of rule-based expert systems. In: Proceedings of the 10th. European Conference on AI (ECAI 1992), pp. 840–844 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dahl, M., Williamson, K.: A verification strategy for long-term maintenance of large rule-based systems. In: Workshop Notes of the AAAI 1992WorkShop on Verification and Validation of expert Systems, pp. 66–71 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ayel, M.: Protocols for consistency checking in expert system knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 1988), pp. 220–225 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ayel, M., Laurent, J.P.: Validation, Verification and Test of Knowledge-Based Systems: SACCO-SYCOJET: Two Different Ways of Verifying Knowledged-Based Systems. John Wiley, Chichester (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. de Antonio, A., Cardeñosa, J., Martínez, L.: GKR: A generic model of knowledge representation. In: Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1994). vol. II (Student Abstracts), p. 1438 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. d’Inverno, M., Kinny, D., Luck, M.: Interaction protocols in agentis. In: Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1998), pp. 261–268 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Antoniou, G.: Verification and correctness issues for nonmonotonic knowledge bases. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 12, 725–738 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kröger, F.: Temporal Logic of Programs. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramýrez, J., de Antonio, A.: Knowledge base semantic verification based on contexts propagation, Notes of the AAAI 2001 Symposium on Model-based Validation of Intelligence (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ramírez, J., de Antonio, A. (2004). Formal Consistency Verification of Deliberative Agents with Respect to Communication Protocols. In: Hinchey, M.G., Rash, J.L., Truszkowski, W.F., Rouff, C.A. (eds) Formal Approaches to Agent-Based Systems. FAABS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3228. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30960-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30960-4_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24422-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30960-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics