Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Participative landscape planning using a GIS approach for facilitation

  • Chapter
Multifunctional Land Use

Abstract

Over thousands of years, humans affect landscapes in a way we cannot comprehend, expect, or control. Nowadays, the strong increase on human action since the middle of the last century and the increasing pressures on landscape resources from different parties mostly involve conflicting interests among stakeholders. In recognition to these environmental pressures, the European Commission established laws, directives, and conventions to be obligatory considered in planning. Hence, landscape planning and landscape management need to take place with the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD-Directive 2000/60/EG), the Natura 2000 Framework (FFH-Directive 92/43/EEC and Bird-Directive 79/409/EEC) and the more pragmatic Landscape Convention (Council of Europe 2000) which all have to correspond to various demands in order to be compliant in future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  • Bastian O (1999) Leitbilder für Naturräume auf der Basis von Landschaftsfunktionen. Natur und Landschaft 74: 361–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian O (2000) Leitbilder — das Patentrezept für die Landschaftsplanung? Geographie und Schule 22: 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy (1950) An outline of General Systems Theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1:139–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand J, Tress B, Tress G (2000) Multifunctional Landscapes: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Landscape Research and Management. In: Conference material for the international conference on “Multifunctional Landscapes: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Landscape Research and Management”, Centre for Landscape Research, University of Roskilde, Denmark, October 18–21, 2000, 263 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt J, Vejre H (2003) Multifunctional Landscapes, Motives, concepts and perspectives. In: Brandt J, Vejre H (eds) 2003. Multifunctional Landscapes. Vol 1 & 2. Advances in Ecological Sciences. WIT Press London. ISBN: 1-85312-936-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchecker M, Hunziker M, Kienast F (2003) Participatory landscape development: overcoming social barriers to public involvement. Landscape and Urban Planning 64: 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunch M (2000) An adaptive ecosystem approach to rehabilitation and management of the Cooum River environmental system in Chennai, India. Dissertation Thesis, University of Waterloo, Ontario, 404 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Scholes J (1990) Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton AMH, Radcliffe N (1996) Sustainability: A Systems Approach. Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R (2000) Visions of alternative (unpredictable) futures and their use in policy analysis. Conservation Ecology 4: 5. URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss1/art5/

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Directive (2 April 1979) on the conservation of wild birds (79/409/EEC); http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/nature/nature_conservation/eu_nature_legislation/birds_directive/index_en.htm (accessed: 09.08.2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Directive (21 May 1992) on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (92/43/EEC); http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/nature/nature_conservation/eu_nature_legislation/habitats_directive/index_en.htm (accessed: 09.08.2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (2000): European Landscape Convention. European Treaty. ETS No. 176. Florence. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/176.htm (accessed: 09.08.2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • di Castri F (1987) The evolution of terrestrial ecosystems. In: Ravera O (ed) Ecological assessment of environmental degradation, pollution and recovery, p.1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and Council of Europe (23 October 2000): Establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (Directive 2000/60/EG); http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/water/water-framework/index_en.html (accessed: 09.08.2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellner A, Kohl M (1994) Leitbilder — Begriffs-Inflation oder Verfahrens-Innovation. ARSU 4: 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finck P, Hauke U, Schröder E, Forst R und Woithe G (eds) (1997) Naturschutzfachliche Landschafts-Leitbilder. Rahmenvorstellungen für das Nordwestdeutsche Tiefland ausbundesweiter Sicht. 265 S., Bonn-Bad Godesberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish R, Haines-Young R und Rubiano J (2003) Stakeholder landscapes and GIS: institutional visions of landscape and sustainability in the management of the Sherwood Natural Area, UK. In: Palang H et al. (eds) Landscape Interfaces. Cultural heritage in changing landscapes, pp. 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaede M, Potschin M (2001): Anforderungen an den Leitbild-Begriff aus planerischer Sicht. Berichte zur deutschen Landeskunde 75: 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (1995) Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber W (1971) Landschaftspflege durch differenzierte Bodennutzung. Bayr. Landw. Jb. 48: 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines-Young R (2000) Sustainable Development and Sustainable Landscapes: Defining a New Paradigm for Landscape Ecology. Fennia 178: 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling C (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jedicke E (1998) Raum-Zeit-Dynamik in Ökosystemen und Landschaften. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 30: 229–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessel B (1994) Leitbilder — Umweltqualitätsziele — Umweltstandards. In: (ANL), B.A.: Leitbilder — Umweltqualitätsziele — Umweltstandards, 04/1994, S. 5–10. — ISBN 3-924374-99-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessel B (1995) Ist künftige Landschaft planbar? Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von ökologisch orientierter Planung. In: Laufener Seminarbeiträge 4/95, Bayerische Akademie für Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege (ANL, Hrsg.): Vision Landschaft 2020 — Von der historischen Kulturlandschaft zur Landschaft von Morgen, 4/95, S. 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser J (ed) (1965) Planung, Bd. I–VI, Baden-Baden. 1965–1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay J (1994) The Ecosystem Approach: Ecosystems as Complex Systems and The Ecosystem Approach Applied to the Huron Natural Area. Prepared for Environment Canada, State of the Environment Reporting, Ottawa, Canada.; http://www.nesh.ca/jameskay/www.fes.uwaterloo.ca/u/jjkay/pubs/nac/index.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay J, Boyle M, Regier H und Francis G (1999) An ecosystem approach for sustainability: Addressing the challenge of complexity. Futures 31: 721–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsland S (2002) Designing nature reserves: adapting ecology to real world problems. Endeavour 26: 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klages L (1906) Das persönliche Leitbild. In: Graphologische Monatshefte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klug H (2000) Landschaftsökologisch begründetes Leitbild für eine funktional vielfältige Landschaft. Das Beispiel Pongau im Salzburger Land. Universität Hannover, 112 S., Diplomarbeit (unpublished), URL: http://www.hermannklug.com, Hannover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klug H (2002) Methodisch-konzeptuelle Landschaftsentwicklung über prozessorientierte, funktional-haushaltliche landschaftsökologische Leitbilder. SIR-Mitteilungen und Berichte 30: 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klug H (2005) Semi-automatische Landschaftsanalyse mit dem ArcGIS 9.x ModelBuilder. Corp 2005. Tagungsband / Proceedings. 10th International Conference on Information & Communication Technologies (ICT) in Urban Planning and Spatial Development and Impacts of ICT on Physical Space. ISBN: 3-901673-12-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Klug H (submitted) No landscape planning without a vision: an extended process-driven Leitbild methodology for the practitioner. Submitted to Journal of Land Use Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klug H, Potschin M (submitted) Introduction to the German speaking Leitbild concept for integrative rural landscape planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klug H, Zeil P (2006) Bridging multi-functionality of agriculture and multifunctional landscapes by applying the Leitbild approach. In: Meyer BC (ed.): Sustainable Land Use in Intensively Used Agricultural Regions. Wageningen, pp. 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo E (1972) The Systems View of the World. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo E (1994) The Choice: Evolution or Extinction. A thinking Person’s Guide to Global issues. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KN (1993) Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mörtl A (2005) Fotorealistische dreidimensionale Landschaftsvisualsierung auf der Basis von GIS-Daten — dargestellt am Beispiel eines Waldentwicklungsszenarios im Nationalpark Berchtesgaden. In: Strobl J, Blaschke T, Griesebner G (eds) Angewandte Geoinformatik. Beiträge zum 17. AGIT-Symposium Salzburg, S. 467–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosimann T, Köhler I, Poppe I (2001) Entwicklung prozessual begründeter landschaftsökologischer Leitbilder für funktional vielfältige Landschaften. In: Gebhardt, H. et al. (eds) Berichte zur Deutschen Landeskunde, 75, S. 33–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss R (2000) Interdisciplinarity, landscape ecology and the “Transformation of Argricultural Landscapes”. Landscape Ecology 15: 303–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (2000a) What is holistic landscape ecology? A conceptual introduction. Landscape and Urban Planning 50: 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (2000b) The Landscape — from vision to Definition. In: Brand J, Tress B, Tress G (eds.) Multifunctional Landscapes: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Landscape Research and Management. Conference material October 18–21, 2000, University of Roskilde, Denmark, p. 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (2004) The importance of multifunctional, self-organising biosphere landscapes for the future of our Total Human Ecosystem — a new paradigm for transdisciplinary landscape ecology. In: Brandt J. et al. (eds) Multifunctional Landscapes: Theory, Values and History, 1, pp. 33–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opdam P, Steingröver E, van Rooij S (2006) Ecological networks: A spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 75: 322–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine I, Stengers I (1984) Order out of Chaos, Man’s Dialogue with Nature. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwineköper K, Seifert P, Konold W (1992) Landschaftsökologische Leitbilder. Garten und Landschaft 6: 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smuts JC (1926) Holism and Evolution, http://www.isss.org/primer/smuts.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Tress B, Tress G (2000) Scenarios for the management of multifunctional landscapes. In: Brandt J, Tress B, Tress G (eds) Multifunctional Landscapes: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Landscape Research and Management. Conference material October 18–21, 2000, University of Roskilde, Denmark, p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tress B, Tress G (2001) Capitalising on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary system approach to landscape research. Landscape and Urban Planning 57: 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tress B, Tress G, Decamps H, d’Hautessere A (2001) Bridging human and natural science in landscape research. Landscape and Urban Planning 57: 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Haaren C (2002) Landscape planning facing the challenge of the development of cultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 60: 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorwald J, Wiegleb G (1998) Beispielhafte Entwicklung von Leitbildern in der Bergbaufolgelandschaft. Aktuelle Reihe 4/98, Brandenburg Technische Universität Cottbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters C (1986) Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegleb G (1997) Leitbildmethode und naturschutzfachliche Bewertung. Z. Ökologie u. Naturschutz 6: 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Geoinformatics (Z_GIS), University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstr. 34, 5020, Salzburg, Austria

    Hermann Klug

Authors
  1. Hermann Klug
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geography, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014, Tartu, Estland

    Ülo Mander

  2. Leibniz-Centre of Agricultural, Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, 15374, Müncheberg, Germany

    Hubert Wiggering  & Katharina Helming  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klug, H. (2007). Participative landscape planning using a GIS approach for facilitation. In: Mander, Ü., Wiggering, H., Helming, K. (eds) Multifunctional Land Use. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36763-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation