Skip to main content

Guiding Movements without Redundancy Problems

  • Chapter
Coordination Dynamics: Issues and Trends

Part of the book series: Understanding Complex Systems ((UCS))

Abstract

Approaches to the problems of multi-muscle and joint redundancy have typically been based on the assumption that control levels of the nervous system directly deal with variables describing the motor output — electromyographic (EMG) signals, forces and kinematics. An alternative approach to these problems can be developed in the framework of the ? model based on the empirical solution of another classical problem in the motor control — that of the relationship between posture and movement. This solution implies that control levels guide movement by changing specific neurophysiological parameters and modify their pattern if the resulting action is in error. Specifically, these control parameters interfere with the transmission of afferent signals by spinal and supraspinal neurons to motoneurons. Some parameters reset the spatial coordinates at which a stable posture of the body or its segments can be reached. Other parameters deal with stability of posture and movement. This parametric control strategy releases higher control levels from the burden of solving redundancy problems at the level of output, i.e. mechanical and EMG variables. In response to changes in control parameters, appropriate values of mechanical and EMG variables and their transformations (e.g., from the hand kinematics to joint angles) emerge automatically, following the natural tendency of the neuromuscular system to reach an equilibrium state. This process results from the natural tendency to minimize the overall activity and the interactions between different components (neurons, muscles and joints) of the neuromuscular system in response to resetting of control parameters (the principle of minimal interaction). Based on these ideas, we outline non-computational, dynamical solutions of the problems of multi-muscle and multi-joint redundancy. This approach does not reject the notion of synergies, primitives, or recently proposed classification of multi-joint co-ordinations into a controlled and uncontrolled manifolds. Rather, it suggests that synergies or manifolds, like trajectories and forces, may be an emergent property of the neuromuscular behavior resulting from the response of the system to changes in control parameters in specific environmental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asatryan DG, Feldman AG (1965) Functional tuning of the nervous system with control of movement or maintenance of a steady posture: 1. Mechanographic analysis of the work of a limb on execution of a postural task. Biophysics 10, 925–935

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamovich SA, Archambault PS, Ghafouri M, Levin MF, Poizner H, Feldman AG (2001) Hand trajectory invariance in reaching movements involving the trunk. Exp Brain Res 138, 288–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramaniam R, Feldman AG (2001) Frames of reference in reaching movements with reversals. In: Proceedings of the X I International conference on Perception and Action, Storrs, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramaniam R, Feldman AG (2002) Some Robotic imitations of biological movement systems might be counterproductive. Behav Brain Sci 24, 1050–1051

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramaniam R, Wing AM (2002) The dynamics of standing balance. Trends Cogn Sci 6, 531–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein N (1967) The coordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan N, Shadmehr R (1999) Computational nature of human adaptive control during the learning of reaching movements in force fields. Biol Cybern 81, 39–60

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG, Levin MF (1995) The origin and use of positional frames of reference in motor control. Behav Brain Sci 18, 723–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG, Orlovsky GN (1972) The influence of different descending systems on the tonic stretch reflex in the cat. Exp Neurol 37, 481–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG, Levin MF, Mitniski AM, Archambault P (1998) Multi-muscle control in human movements. J Electromyogr Kines 8, 383–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand IM, Tsetlin ML (1971) On mathematical modelling of mechanisms of central nervous system. In: Gelfand IM, Gurfinkel VS, Fomin SV, Tsetlin ML (eds.) Models of structural-functional organization of certain biological systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghafouri M, Archambault P, Adamovich SV, Feldman AG, (2002) Pointing movements may be produced in different frames of reference depending on task demands. Brain Res 929, 117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glansdorff P, Prigogine I, (1971) Thermodynamic Theory of Structure, Stability and Fluctuations.Wiley, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hollerbach JM (1972) Computers, brains and the control of movement. Trends Neurosci 6, 189–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawato M (1999) Internal models of motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9, 718–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JAS (1995) Dynamic Patterns. Cambridge, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lashley KS (1951) The problem of serial order in behaviour. In: Jefress LA, (ed.) Cerebral mechanisms in behaviour. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lestienne FG, Thullier F, Archambault P, Levin MF, Feldman AG (2000) Multi-muscle control of head movements in monkeys: The referent configuration hypothesis. Neurosci Lett 283, 65–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin MF, Lamarre Y, Feldman AG (1995) Control variables and proprioceptive feedback in fast single joint movement. Can J Physiol Pharm 73, 316–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin MF, Dumov M (1997) Spatial zones for muscle co-activation and the control of postural stability. Brain Res 757, 43–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin MF, Selles RW, Verheul MHG, Meijer OG (2000) Deficits in coordination of agonist and antagonist muscles in stroke patients: Implications for motor control. Brain Res 853, 352–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews PBC (1959) The dependence of tension upon extension in the stretch reflex of the soleus muscle in the decerebrate cat. J Physiol 147, 52–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostry DJ, Feldman AG (2003) A critical evaluation of force control hypothesis in motor control. Experimental Brain Res, in press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigeon P, Yahia LH, Mitniski AB, Feldman AG (2000) Superposition of independent units of coordination during pointing movements is preserved in the absence of visual feedback. Exp Brain Res 131, 336–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi E, Mitniski AM, Feldman AG (2002) Sequential control signals determine arm and trunk contributions to hand transport during reaching in humans. J Physiol-London 538, 659–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz JP, Schöner G (1999) The uncontrolled manifold concept: Identifying control variables for functional tasks. Exp Brain Res 26, 289–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz JP, Reisman D, Schöner G (2001). Effects of Varying Task Constraints on Solutions to Joint Control in Sit-to-Stand. Exp Brain Res 141, 485–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz JP, Schöner G, Latash ML (2000) Identifying the control structure of multij oint coordination during pistol shooting. Exp Brain Res 135, 382–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Holst E, Mittelstaedt H (1950/1973) Daz reafferezprincip.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechselwirkungenzwischen Zentralnerven-system und Peripherie, Naturwiss, 37 467–476. The reafference principle. In: Martin R (translator) The Behavioral Physiology of Animals and Man. The collected papers of Erich von Holst. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z (2000) Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3, 1212–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Flanagan JR (2001) Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends Cogn Sci 5, 487–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Kawato M (1998) Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks 11, 1317–1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Won J, Hogan N (1995) Spatial properties of human reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 107, 125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Balasubramaniam, R., Feldman, A.G. (2004). Guiding Movements without Redundancy Problems. In: Jirsa, V.K., Kelso, J.A.S. (eds) Coordination Dynamics: Issues and Trends. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39676-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39676-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05790-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39676-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics