Skip to main content

United States of America: A Snapshot of US' Practices

  • Chapter
Global Practices of Corporate Social Responsibility

Organizations increasingly are embracing the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR). In this study CSR refers to actions that further some social good, beyond the interests of the firm and that which is required by law (McWilliams et al., 2006). Specifically, CSR consists of economic citizenship, legal citizenship, ethical citizenship, and discretionary citizenship (Maignan, 1997; Maignan and Fer-rell, 2001; Maignan et al., 1999). Despite the fact that CSR is popular, with its theoretical underpinnings having been the topic of frequent discussions, empirical studies often involve only limited aspects. This state of affair implies that theory may not be congruent with actual practices, which again may impede our understanding and further development of CSR. We examine actual CSR practices that relate to five different stakeholder groups; subsequently, we develop an instrument to measure those CSR practices and apply it to a survey of 401 U.S. organizations. We identify four different clusters of organizations, depending on the CSR practice focus. The distinctive features of each cluster relate to organizational demographics, perceived influence of stakeholders, managers' perceptions of the influence of CSR on performance, and organizational performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andriof, J.: 2000, ‘Mapping the Research within Corporate Citizenship: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’, working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriof, J. and C. Marsden: 2000, ‘Corporate Citizenship: What Is It and How to Assess It?’ in M. McIntosh and A. Warhurst (eds.), Third Annual Warwick Corporate Citizenship Unit Conference (University of Warwick, Coventry).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K.E., A.B. Carroll, and J.D. Hatfield: 1985, ‘An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability’, Academy of Management Journal 28(2), 446–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beltz, F., M.-P. Kestemont, and L. Strannegard: 1997, International Business Environmental Barometer (Cappelen Akademisk Forlag, Copenhagen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C.B. and S. Sen: 2004, ‘Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives’, California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.R: 1953, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman (Harper-Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T.J. and P.A. Dacin: 1997, ‘The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses’, Journal of Marketing 61(1), 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business Ethics: 1997a, ‘Does It Pay to be Ethical?’ (March/April), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Ethics: 1997b, ‘NLC Names Corporate Names in Sweatshop Reports’, (January– February), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B.: 1979, ‘A Three-dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance’, Academy of Management Review 4(4), 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chand, M.: 2006, ‘The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance: Industry Type as a Boundary Condition’, The Business Review, 5(1), 240–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M.B.E: 1995, ‘A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cone Corporate Citizenship Study: 2004, http://www.mybizwarehouse.com/2ndbusiness/ 2004ConeCorporateCitizenshipStudy.pdf.

  • Crane, A., and D. Matten: 2004, Business Ethics: A European Perspective (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K.: 1973 , ‘The Case For and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities’, Academy of Management Journal 16(3), 312–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. and R.L. Blomstrom: 1975, Business and Society: Environment and Responsibility (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpandé, R. and F.E. Webster: 1989, ‘Organizational Culture and Marketing: Defining the Research Agenda’, Journal of Marketing 53(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drumwright, M.E.: 1994, ‘Socially Responsible Organizational Buying: Environmental Concern as a Noneconomic Buying Criterion’, Journal of Marketing 58(3), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. and M. Shanley: 1990, ‘What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy’, Academy of Management Journal 33(2), 233–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greening, D.W. and B. Gray: 1994, ‘Testing a Model of Organizational Response to Social and Political Issues’, Academy of Management Journal 37(3), 467–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J.J. and J.F. Mahon: 1997, ‘The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate’, Business and Society 36(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, and W.C. Black: 1998, Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed. (Prentice-Hall International, Upper Saddle River, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Lord and R. Watts: 1999, ‘Making Good Business Sense’, in The World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Conches-Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.M.: 1980, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined’, California Management Review, 22(3), 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M.S., L.K. Ferrell, and D.T. LeClair: 2001, ‘Consumers' Trust of Salesperson and Manufacturer: An Empirical Study’, Journal of Business Research 51(1), 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khireche-Oldache, B.: 1998, ‘L'entreprise citoyenne, une approche par les normes environnemen-tales’, Cahier de Recherche 1998–10, Grefige-Université Nancy 2, Nance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, M.: 1997, ‘Count on Them in. Corporate America Is Eager to Volunteer Help to the Needy. The Reason Is the Bottom-line’, The Boston Globe, (April 20), F1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, D.R., M.E. Drumwright, and B.M. Braig: 2004, ‘The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Donations to Corporate-supported Nonprofits’, Journal of Marketing 68(4), 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgreen, A. and V. Swaen: 2004, ‘Corporate Citizenship: Let not Relationship Marketing Escape the Management Toolbox’, Corporate Reputation Review 7(4), 346–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X. and C.B. Bhattacharya: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value’, Journal of Marketing 70(4), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I.: 1997 , Antecedents and Benefits of Corporate Citizenship: A Comparison of U.S. and French Businesses, unpublished PhD thesis (University of Memphis at Tampa, TN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I. and O.C. Ferrell: 2001, ‘Antecedents and Benefits of Corporate Citizenship: An Investigation of French businesses’, Journal of Business Research 51(1), 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., O.C. Ferrell, and T. Hult: 1999, ‘Corporate Citizenship: Cultural Antecedents and Business Benefits’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27(4), 455–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I. and V. Swaen: 2004, ‘La Responsabilité Sociale d'une Organisation: Intégration des Perspectives Marketing et Manageriale’, Revue Franc¸aise du Marketing 200(5), 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, C. and J. Andriof: 1998, ‘Towards an Understanding of Corporate Citizenship and How to Influence It’, Citizenship Studies 2(2), 329–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R.L.: 2002, ‘The Virtue Matrix: Calculating the Return on Corporate Responsibility’, Harvard Business Review 80(3), 68–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, M., D. Leipziger, K. Jones, and G. Coleman: 1998, Corporate Citizenship: Successful Strategies for Responsible Companies (Pitman Publishing, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • McStravic, S.: 2000, ‘Strategic Differentiation becoming “Watchword” for Health Care Organizations’, Health Care Strategic Management 18(8), 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel: 2001, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective’, The Academy of Management Review 26(1), 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., D.S. Siegel, and P.M. Wright: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications’, Journal of Management Studies 43(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., D.D. Van Fleet, and K. Cory: 2002, ‘Raising Rivals' Costs Through Political Strategy: An Extension of the Resource-based Theory’, Journal of Management Studies 39(5), 707–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, A. and A. Menon: 1997, ‘Enviropreneurial Marketing Strategy: The Emergence of Corporate Environmentalism as Marketing Strategy’, Journal of Marketing 61(1), 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkston, T.S. and A.B. Carroll: 1994, ‘Corporate Citizenship Perspectives and Foreign Direct Investment in the US’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(2), 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkston, T.S. and A.B. Carroll: 1996, ‘A Retrospective Examination of CSR Orientations: Have They Changed?’ Journal of Business Ethics 15(2), 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S.P.: 1975, ‘Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework’, California Management Review 17(3), 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snider, J., R.P. Hill, and D. Martin: 2003, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A View from the World's Most Successful Firms’, Journal of Business Ethics 48(2), 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanwick, S.D. and P.A. Stanwick: 1998, ‘Corporate Social Responsiveness: an Empirical Examination Using the Environmental Disclosure Index’, International Journal of Commerce and Management 8(3/4), 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaen, V. (2004), Etude des perceptions et des réactions des consommateurs face aux activité s citoyennes des entreprises: Application à deux catégories de produits, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaen, V., R. Chumpitaz, E. Bigné, and L. Andreu: 2003, ‘Being a Socially Responsible Company: What does it Mean for European Young Consumers? Analysis of the Impact of Perceived Environment, Culture and Values’, Proceedings of the European Marketing Academy Conference, May 20–22, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D.B. and D.W. Greening: 1997, ‘Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees’, Academy of Management Journal 40(3), 658–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warhurst, A.: 2001, ‘Corporate Citizenship and Corporate Social Investment: Drivers of Tri-Sector Partnerships’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship 1(Spring), 57–73

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., Johnston, W.J. (2009). United States of America: A Snapshot of US' Practices. In: Idowu, S.O., Filho, W.L. (eds) Global Practices of Corporate Social Responsibility. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68815-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics