Abstract
Being able to readily discriminate between natural things and synthetic mimics in our environment is an important ability for many species. Making these judgements relies on the acuity of our different senses. Here, we investigated the relative contribution of visual and tactile cues, alone or in combination, to the categorisation of wood and fabric stimuli as natural or unnatural. For both wood and fabric stimuli we found that natural and unnatural stimuli could be discriminated, although performance varied as a function of modality. Specifically, for the wood stimuli, performance was better when vision and touch were combined, whereas for the fabric stimuli, performance was least accurate when using touch alone, compared to the visual or bimodal conditions, which were quantitatively similar. We concluded that both vision and touch contribute, albeit in qualitatively different ways, to the perception of “naturalness”, and that a combination of these modalities facilitates this perception.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adelson, E.H.: On seeing stuff: the perception of materials by humans and machines. In: Rogowitz, B.E., Pappas, T.N. (eds.) Proc. of the SPIE, 2001. Human Vision and Electronic Imaging VI, vol. 4299, pp. 1–12, International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham, WA (2001)
Ballesteros, S., Reales, J.M., Pónce de Leon, L., García, B.: The Perception of ecological textures by touch: Does the perceptual space change under bimodal visual and haptic exploration? In: Proc. of the First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (World Haptics), World Haptics (2005)
Bergmann Tiest, W.M., Kappers, A.M.L.: Analysis of haptic perception of materials by multidimensional scaling and physical measurements of roughness and compressibility. Acta Psychol. 121, 1–20 (2006)
Bergmann Tiest, W.M., Kappers, A.M.L.: Haptic and visual perception of roughness. Acta Psychol. 124, 177–189 (2007)
Brown, I.D.: Visual and tactual judgements of surface roughness. Ergonomics 3, 51–61 (1960)
Guest, S., Spence, C.: What role does multisensory integration play in the visuotactile perception of texture? Int. J. Psychophysiol. 50, 63–80 (2003)
Hollins, M., Bensmaïa, S.J., Karlof, K., Young, F.: Individual differences in perceptual space for tactile textures: Evidence from multidimensional scaling. Percept. Psychophys. 62, 1534–1544 (2000)
Hollins, M., Faldowski, R., Rao, S., Young, F.: Perceptual dimensions of tactile surface texture: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Percept. Psychophys. 54, 697–705 (1993)
Humphrey, G.K., Goodale, M.A., Jakobson, L.S., Servos, P.: The role of surface information in object recognition: Studies of a visual form agnosic and normal subjects. Perception 23, 1457–1481 (1994)
Lederman, S.J., Klatzky, R.L.: Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognit. Psychol. 19, 342–368 (1987)
Picard, D., Dacremont, C., Valentin, D., Giboreau, A.: Perceptual dimensions of tactile textures. Acta. Psychol. 114, 165–184 (2003)
Rozin, P.: The meaning of “natural”. Psychol. Sci. 16, 652–658 (2005)
Rozin, P., Fischler, C., Shields, C.: Conceptions of “natural” in the domain of foods in France, Germany, Italy, U.K. and the USA. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (unpublished manuscript, 2005)
Rozin, P., Spranca, M., Krieger, Z., Neuhaus, R., Surillo, D., Swerdlin, A., et al.: Natural preference: Instrumental and ideational/moral motivations, and the contrast between food and medicines. Appetite 43, 147–154 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Whitaker, T.A., Simões-Franklin, C., Newell, F.N. (2008). The Natural Truth: The Contribution of Vision and Touch in the Categorisation of “Naturalness”. In: Ferre, M. (eds) Haptics: Perception, Devices and Scenarios. EuroHaptics 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5024. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69057-3_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69057-3_39
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69056-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69057-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)