Skip to main content

An Open Source Simulation Model of Software Development and Testing

  • Conference paper
Hardware and Software, Verification and Testing (HVC 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4383))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper describes a new discrete event simulation model built using a mathematical tool (Matlab) to investigate the simulation of the programming and the testing phases of a software development project. In order to show how the model can be used and to provide some preliminary concrete results, we give three examples of how this model can be utilized to examine the effect of adopting different strategies for coding and testing a new software system. Specifically, we provide results of simulation runs intended to simulate the effects on the coding and testing phases of different testing strategies, the adoption of pair programming in an otherwise-unchanged process, and the automation of testing. The model source code is available for downloading at http://qp.research.ibm.com/concurrency_testing, and we invite researchers and practitioners to use and modify the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beck, K.: Extreme Programming Explained. Addison Wesley Professional, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Capers Jones, T.: Estimating Software Costs. McGraw-Hill, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Capers Jones, T.: Applied software measurement: assuring productivity and quality. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. George, B., Williams, L.A.: An Initial Investigation of Test Driven Development in Industry. In: Proc. ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC) 2003,, Melbourne, FL, USA, March, 2003, ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holger, C., Zeller, A.: Locating Causes of Program Failures. In: Inverardi, P., Jazayeri, M. (eds.) ICSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 4309, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. IBM Rational Unified Process: Best practices for software development teams, http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/253.html accessed Dec. 2005

  7. Kramer C.: Black Box Software Testing, Section: 7: The Black Box Testing Organization (2001), available at http://testingeducation.org/course_notes/kaner_cem/ac_200108_blackboxtesting/blackboxtesting_07_blackbox_testing_group.pdf accessed 11 December 2005

  8. Laitenberger, O., DeBaud, J.: An Encompassing Life-Cycle Centric Survey of Software Inspection. Report ISERN, pp. 98–32. Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Madachy, R.J.: System Dynamics Modeling of an Inspection Based Process. In: Proc. International Conference on Software Engineering (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marick, B.: When should a test be automated? (1998), http://www.testing.com/writings/automate.pdf accessed 16 December 2005

  11. Maximilien, E.M., Williams, L.: Assessing test-driven development at IBM. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 564–569 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Onoma, A.K., et al.: Regression testing in an industrial environment. Comm. ACM 41(5), 81–86 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Raffo, D., et al.: Guest Editors’ Introduction: Special Issue on Software Process Simulation Modelling. J. Systems and Software 46(2/3) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rothermel, G., Harrold, M.J.: Analyzing Regression Test Selection Techniques. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 22(8), 529–551 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. RTI The Economic Impacts of Inadequate Infrastructure for Software Testing. Final report (May 2002), retrieved from http://www.nist.gov/director/prog-ofc/report02-3.pdf on 21 June 2006.

  16. Wernick, P., Hall, T.: The Impact of Using Pair Programming on System Evolution: a Simulation-based Study. In: Proc. ICSM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wernick, P., Scacchi, W.: Guest Editors’ Introduction: Special Issue on ProSim 2003. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 9(2) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Williams, L., et al.: Strengthening the Case for Pair Programming. IEEE Software 17(4), 19–25 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Eyal Bin Avi Ziv Shmuel Ur

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ur, S., Yom-Tov, E., Wernick, P. (2007). An Open Source Simulation Model of Software Development and Testing. In: Bin, E., Ziv, A., Ur, S. (eds) Hardware and Software, Verification and Testing. HVC 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4383. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70889-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70889-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70888-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70889-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics