Skip to main content

A Lightweight Component Caching Scheme for Satisfiability Solvers

  • Conference paper
Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2007 (SAT 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4501))

Abstract

We introduce in this paper a lightweight technique for reducing work repetition caused by non–chronological backtracking commonly practiced by DPLL–based SAT solvers. The presented technique can be viewed as a partial component caching scheme. Empirical evaluation of the technique reveals significant improvements on a broad range of industrial instances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aloul, F., Markov, I., Sakallah, K.: Force: a fast and easy-to-implement variable-ordering heuristic. In: Proc. of the 13th ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI 2003, pp. 116–119 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bayardo Jr., R.J., Schrag, R.C.: Using CSP look-back techniques to solve real-world SAT instances. In: AAAI’97, Providence, Rhode Island, pp. 203–208 (1997), citeseer.ist.psu.edu/article/bayardo97using.html

  3. Beame, P., et al.: Memoization and dpll: Formula caching proof systems. In: Proc. of 18th Annual IEEE Conf. on Computational Complexity, Aarhus, Denmark, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2003), citeseer.ist.psu.edu/beame03memoization.html

    Google Scholar 

  4. Biere, A., Sinz, C.: Decomposing sat problems into connected components. Journal on Satisfiability, Boolean Modeling and Computation (JSAT) 2 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Darwiche, A.: New advances in compiling CNF to decomposable negational normal form. In: Proc. of European Conference on AI (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Durairaj, V., Kalla, P.: Variable Ordering for Efficient SAT Search by Analyzing Constraint-Variable Dependencies. In: Bacchus, F., Walsh, T. (eds.) SAT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3569, pp. 415–422. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eén, N., Sörensson, N.: An extensible sat-solver. In: Giunchiglia, E., Tacchella, A. (eds.) SAT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2919, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ginsberg, M.L.: Dynamic backtracking. Jrnl of Artf. Intel. Resrh. 1, 25–46 (1993), ftp://ftp.cirl.uoregon.edu/pub/users/ginsberg/papers/dynamic.ps.gz

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, J., Darwiche, A.: A structure-based variable ordering heuristic for sat. In: IJCAI’03, Acapulco, Mexico, pp. 1167–1172 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. IBM: Ibm formal verification benchmark library, http://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/projects/verification/RB_Homepage/fvbenchmarks.html

  11. Marques-Silva, J.P., Sakallah, K.A.: GRASP - A New Search Algorithm for Satisfiability. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, pp. 220–227. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1996), citeseer.ist.psu.edu/article/marques-silva96grasp.html

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Pipatsrisawat, K., Darwiche, A.: SAT Solver Description: RSat

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roberto, J., Bayardo, J., Pehoushek, J.D.: Counting models using connected components. In: Proc. of the 17th Natl. Conf. on AI, pp. 157–162. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rsat sat solver homepage, http://reasoning.cs.ucla.edu/rsat

  15. Sang, T., et al.: Combining component caching and clause learning for effective model counting. In: Hoos, H.H., Mitchell, D.G. (eds.) SAT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3542, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Beame, P., Kautz, H., Sang, T.: Heuristics for Fast Exact Model Counting. In: Bacchus, F., Walsh, T. (eds.) SAT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3569, pp. 226–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. SAT’05 Competition Homepage, http://www.satcompetition.org/2005/

  18. Stallman, R.M., Sussman, G.J.: Forward reasoning and dependency-directed backtracking in a system for computer-aided circuit analysis. Artf. Intel. 9 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Velev, M. N.: Sat benchmark lib, www.miroslav-velev.com/sat_benchmarks.html

  20. Zhang, L., et al.: Efficient conflict driven learning in boolean satisfiability solver. In: ICCAD, pp. 279–285 (2001), citeseer.ist.psu.edu/article/zhang01efficient.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

João Marques-Silva Karem A. Sakallah

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pipatsrisawat, K., Darwiche, A. (2007). A Lightweight Component Caching Scheme for Satisfiability Solvers. In: Marques-Silva, J., Sakallah, K.A. (eds) Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2007. SAT 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4501. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72788-0_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72788-0_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72787-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72788-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics