Skip to main content

Designing Representative Bodies When the Voter Preferences Are Fuzzy

  • Conference paper
Foundations of Fuzzy Logic and Soft Computing (IFSA 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4529))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The theory of fuzzy sets has been applied to social choice primarily in the contexts where one is given a set of individual fuzzy preference relations and the aim is to find a non-fuzzy choice set of winners or best alternatives. We discuss the problem of composing multi-member deliberative bodies starting from a set of individual fuzzy preference relations. We outline methods of aggregating these relations into a measure of how well each candidate represents each voter in terms of the latter’s preferences. Our main goal is to show how the considerations discussed in the context of individual non-fuzzy complete and transitive preference relations can be extended into the domain of fuzzy preference relations.

An extended version of this paper will appear in New Mathematics and Natural Computation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barrett, C.R., Pattanaik, P., Salles, M.: On choosing rationally when preferences are fuzzy. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 34, 197–212 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Chamberlin, J., Courant, P.: Representative deliberations and representative decisions: Proportional representation and the Borda rule. The American Political Science Review 77, 718–733 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Milnor, J.: Games against nature. In: Thrall, R., Coombs, C., Davis, R. (eds.) Decision Processes, Wiley, New York (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Monroe, B.: Fully proportional representation. The American Political Science Review 89, 925–940 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Potthoff, R., Brams, S.: Proportional representation: Broadening the options. Journal of Theoretical Politics 10, 147–178 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rawls, J.: A Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rogowski, R.: Representation in political theory and law. Ethics 91, 395–430 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Patricia Melin Oscar Castillo Luis T. Aguilar Janusz Kacprzyk Witold Pedrycz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nurmi, H., Kacprzyk, J. (2007). Designing Representative Bodies When the Voter Preferences Are Fuzzy. In: Melin, P., Castillo, O., Aguilar, L.T., Kacprzyk, J., Pedrycz, W. (eds) Foundations of Fuzzy Logic and Soft Computing. IFSA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4529. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72950-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72950-1_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72917-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72950-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics