Abstract
In order to create and maintain social relationships with human users in mixed-initiative dialogues, IVAs have to give off coherent signals of claiming or relinquishing leadership in discourse. Quantitaive and qualitative analyses of human-human collaborative task-solving dialogues from the Ohio State University Quake Corpus reveal that discursive dominance is a shared achievement of speakers and given, taken or kept in a consensual way, up to the point where they incur “costs” in terms of efficiency in solving the task. Some verbal signals can be identified as relevant to this process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, J.F.: Mixed-initiative interaction. In: IEEE Intelligent Systems, pp. 14–16 (1999)
Brindöpke, C., Häger, J., Johanntokrax, M., Phade, A., Schwalbe, M., Wrede, B.: Darf ich Dich Marvin nennen? Instruktionsdialoge in einem WoZ-Szenario. Szenario-Design und Auswertung. Bielefeld: Universität Bielefeld (1995)
Byron, D.K., Fosler-Lussier, E.: The OSU Quake 2004 corpus of two-party situated problem-solving dialogs. In: LREC 2006. Proceedings of the 15th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (2006), available from http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~dbyron/pubs.html
Chu-Carroll, J., Brown, M.K.: Tracking Initiative in Collaborative Dialogue Interactions. In: ACL/EACL 1997. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 262–270 (1997)
Eggins, S., Slade, D.: Analysing Casual Conversation. Equinox, London (1997)
Fairclough, N.: Language and Power, 2nd edn. Longman, Harlow (2001)
Fischer, K.: The Role of Users Preconceptions in Talking to Computers and Robots. In: Fischer, K. (ed.) How People Talk to Computers, Robots, and Other Artificial Communication Partners, SFB/TR 8 Spatial Cognition. pp. 112–130 (2006b) (What Computer Talk Is and Isn’t. AQ-Verlag, Saarbrücken, 2006a)
Ferguson, G., Allen, J.F.: TRIPS: An Integrated Intelligent Problem-Solving Assistant. In: Proc. AAAI-98, pp. 567–573. Madison, WI (1998)
Ferguson, G., Allen, J.F., Miller, B.: TRAINS-95: Towards a mixed-initiative planning assistant. In: Drabble, B. (ed.) Proc. 3rd Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems AIPS-96, Edinburgh, pp. 70–77 (1995)
Guinn, C.I.: Evaluating mixed-initiative dialog. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21–23 (1999)
Payr, S.: Social Role Management in Human-Computer Interaction I. Vienna: Österreichisches Forschungsinstitut für Artificial Intelligence TR-2006-15 (2006b), Seriously Socially Situated Agents. In: Trappl, R.(ed.) Proceedings EMCSR 2006, OGKS Vienna (2006a)
ten Have, P.: Doing Conversation Analysis. Sage, London (1999)
Thornborrow, J.: Power Talk. Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. Longman, Harlow (2002)
Watts, R.J.: Politeness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Payr, S. (2007). So Let’s See: Taking and Keeping the Initiative in Collaborative Dialogues. In: Pelachaud, C., Martin, JC., André, E., Chollet, G., Karpouzis, K., Pelé, D. (eds) Intelligent Virtual Agents. IVA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4722. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74997-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74997-4_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74996-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74997-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)