Skip to main content

Hierarchical Verification in Maude of LfP Software Architectures

  • Conference paper
Software Architecture (ECSA 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4758))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Software architecture description languages allow software designers to focus on high level aspects of an application by abstracting from details. In general, a system’s architecture is specified in a hierarchical way. In fact, hierarchical components hide, at each level, the complexity of the sub-entities composing the system. As rewriting logic is a natural semantic framework for representing concurrency, parallelism, communication and interaction, it can be used for systems specification and verification. In this paper, we show how we can take advantage of hierarchical modeling of software systems specified with LfP, to prototype model checking process using Maude system. This approach allows us to hide and show, freely and easily, encapsulated details by moving between hierarchical levels. Thus, state explosion problem is mastered and reduced. In addition, system’s maintainability and error detection become easier and faster.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Garlan, D.: Software architecture. Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, School of computer science, Carnegie Mellon University (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leucker, M.: Rewriting logic as a framework for building generic tools for verifying concurrent systems. RWTH Aachen, Germany (1998), URL: citeseer.ist.psu.edu/leucker98rewriting.html

  3. Clavel, M., et al.: Maude manuel (version 2.1) (March 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Malcolm, G., Goguen, J.: Proving correctness of refinement and implementation. Technical report, Oxford University (January 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gilliers, F.: Développement par prototypage et Généation de Code à partir de LfP, un langage de modélisation de haut niveau. PhD thesis, Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris VI, France (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jerad, C., Barkaoui, K.: On the use of rewriting logic for verification of distributed software architecture description based lfp. In: Proceedings the 16th IEEE International Workshop on Rapid System Prototyping, Montreal, Canada, June 2005, pp. 202–208. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Jerad, C., Barkaoui, K., Grissa Touzi, A.: Vérification des architectures de systmes distribués par utilisation du ltl model checker de maude. In: 8th African Conference on Research in Computer Science, Cotonou, Benin, pp. 99–106 (November 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richard, N., Medvidovic, N., Taylor: A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 26(1) (January 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kenney, J.J.: Executable Formal Models of Distributed Transaction Systems Based on Event Processing. PhD thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, USA (June 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Allen, R.J.: A Formal Approach to Software Architecture. PhD thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, USA (May 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Regep, D., Kordon, F.: LfP: A specification language for rapid prototyping of concurrent systems. In: 12th International Workshop on Rapid System Prototyping, Monterey, California, pp. 90–96 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meseguer, J.: Rewriting as a unified model of concurrency. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Klop, J.W. (eds.) CONCUR 1990. LNCS, vol. 458, pp. 384–400. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meseguer, J.: Rewriting logic as a semantic framework for concurrency. In: Sassone, V., Montanari, U. (eds.) CONCUR 1996. LNCS, vol. 1119, Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marti-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J.: Rewriting logic: Roadmap and bibliography. Theoretical Computer Science (June 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gilliers, F.: Description de la sémantique du langage LfP. Work document, RNTL MOSE Project MORSE-SRS-031114-V0.15-FGI, Pierre et Marie Curie University, LIP6, France (June 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. MORSE project web site, http://www.lip6.fr/morse/

  17. Wegmann, A., Naumenko, A.: Conceptual modelling of complex systems using an rm-odp based ontology. In: 5th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, Seattle, USA, pp. 27–34 (September 2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Flavio Oquendo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jerad, C., Barkaoui, K., Grissa Touzi, A. (2007). Hierarchical Verification in Maude of LfP Software Architectures. In: Oquendo, F. (eds) Software Architecture. ECSA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4758. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75132-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75132-8_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75131-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75132-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics