Skip to main content

A Brief Overview of the State-of-the-Practice and Current Challenges of Solution Verification

  • Conference paper
Computational Methods in Transport: Verification and Validation

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering ((LNCSE,volume 62))

Summary

The main goal of solution verification is to assess the convergence of numerical predictions as a function of discretization variables such as element size Δx or time step Δt. The challenge is to verify that the approximate solutions of the discretized conservation laws or equations-of-motion converge to the solution of the continuous equations. In the case of code verification where the continuous solution of a test problem is known, common practice is to obtain several discrete solutions from successively refined meshes or grids; calculate norms of the solution error; and verify the rate with which discrete solutions converge to the continuous solution. With solution verification, where the continuous solution is unknown, common practice is to obtain several discrete solutions from successively refined meshes or grids; extrapolate an estimate of the continuous solution; verify the rate-of-convergence; and estimate numerical uncertainty bounds. The formalism proposed to verify the convergence of discrete solutions derives from postulating how truncation error behaves in the asymptotic regime of convergence. This publication summarizes the state-of-the-practice but also challenges some of the commonly accepted views of verification. Examples are given from the disciplines of computational hydro-dynamics that involve the calculation of smooth or discontinuous solutions of non-linear, hyperbolic equations such as the 1D Burgers equation; and engineering mechanics that involve the calculation of smooth solutions of linear or non-linear, elliptic equations. A non-exhaustive list of topics that warrant further research includes: extending the state-of-the-practice to non-scalar quantities (curves, multiple-dimensional fields); studying the coupling between space and time discretizations; defining a reference mesh for the estimation of solution error; and developing technology to verify adaptive mesh refinement calculations in computational engineering and physics. (Approved for unlimited, public release, LA-UR-06-8078, Unclassified.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hemez, F. M., Doebling, S. W., Anderson, M. C., A Brief Tutorial on Verification and Validation, 22nd SEM International Modal Analysis Conference, Dearborn, Michigan, January 26-29, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brock, J. S., ASC Level-2 Milestone Plan: Code Verification, Calculation Verification, Solution-error Analysis, and Test-problem Development for LANL Physics-simulation Codes, Technical Report of the ASC Program and Code Verification Project, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, May 2005. LA-UR-05-4212.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kamm, J. R., Rider, W. J., Brock, J. S., Consistent Metrics for Code Verification, Technical Report, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, June 2002. LA-UR-02-3794.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kamm, J. R., Rider, W. J., Brock, J. S., Combined Space and Time Convergence Analyses of a Compressible Flow Algorithm, 16th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, Florida, July 2003. LA-UR-03-2628.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Knoll, D. A., Chacon, L., Margolin, L. G., Mousseau, V. A., On Balanced Approximations for Time Integration of Multiple Time Scale Systems, Jour- nal of Computational Physics, 185 (2), 2003, 583-611.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Buechler, M., McCarty, A., Reding, D., Maupin, R. D., Explicit Finite Element Code Verification Problems, 22nd SEM International Modal Analysis Confer- ence, Dearborn, Michigan, January 2004. LA-UR-03-4603.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li, S., Rider, W. J., Shashkov, M. J., Two-dimensional Convergence Study for Problems with Exact Solution: Uniform and Adaptive Grids, Technical Report of the ASC Program and Code Verification Project, Los Alamos National Lab- oratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, October 2005. LA-UR-05-7985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smitherman, D. P., Kamm, J. R., Brock, J. S., Calculation Verification: Point- wise Estimation of Solutions and Their Method-Associated Numerical Error, Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information and Communication, Vol. 4, 2007, pp. 676-692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hemez, F. M., Brock, J. S., Kamm, J. R., Non-linear Error Ansatz Models in Space and Time for Solution Verification, 1st Non-deterministic Approaches (NDA) Conference and 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Struc- tural Dynamics, and Materials (SDM) Conference, Newport, Rhode Island, May 1-4, 2006. LA-UR-06-3705.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roache, P. J., Verification in Computational Science and Engineering, Hermosa Publishers, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hemez, F. M., Non-linear Error Ansatz Models for Solution Verification in Com- putational Physics, Technical Report of the ASC Program and Code Verification Project, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, October 2005. LA-UR-05-8228.

    Google Scholar 

  12. LeVeque, R. J., Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws, Birkhauser, 1990.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. LeVeque, R. J., Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Roache, P. J., Perspective: A Method for Uniform Reporting of Grid Refinement Studies, ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 116, 1994, 405-413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stern, F., Wilson, R., Shao, J., Quantitative V&V of Computational Fluid Dy- namics (CFD) Simulations and Certification of CFD Codes with Examples, 2004 ICHMT International Symposium on Advances in Computational Heat Transfer, Norway, April 19-24, 2004. Paper CHT-04-V1.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Knupp, P., Salari, K., Verification of Computer Codes in Computational Science and Engineering, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1st edition, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roy, C., Review of Code and Solution Verification Procedures for Computa- tional Simulation, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 205, No. 1, May 2005, pp. 131-156.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hemez, F. M., Functional Data Analysis of Solution Convergence, Technical Re- port, Contribution to the Fiscal Year 2007 ASC Verification and Validation Project “Code Verification, ” Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, August 2007. LA-UR-07-5758.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Salari, K., Knupp, P., Code Verification by the Method of Manufactured Solutions, Technical Report, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 2000. SAND-2000-1444.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Warming, R., Hyett, B., The Modified Equation Approach to the Stability and Accuracy Analysis of Finite Difference Methods, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 14, 1974, pp. 159-179.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Ainsworth, M., Oden, J. T., A Posterior Error Estimation in Finite Element Analysis, Wiley Inter-science Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Wiley, New York, pp. 16-23, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hemez, F.M., Kamm, J.R. (2008). A Brief Overview of the State-of-the-Practice and Current Challenges of Solution Verification. In: Graziani, F. (eds) Computational Methods in Transport: Verification and Validation. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol 62. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77362-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics