Abstract
Breadth and depth complexity are key challenges in achieving business process fusion as the enabler for value configuration design. The PARM framework is proposed as the requirement to address breadth and depth complexity through the independent but integrated operation of the process, activity, resource and management viewpoints. The operational scenarios for each viewpoint result in varying process modeling extension requirements. Existing process modeling constructs have varying support for these requirements. The PARM framework solution is an extension and integration of existing modeling constructs rather than a solution in its own right. Using the MDA approach of abstracting a platform independent model from a platform specific implementation, it is the goal in future papers to define process modeling extensions to support the PARM framework and map these into existing implementation architectures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Porter, M.E.: Competitive Advantage (1985)
Stabell, Fjeldstad: Configuring value for competitive advantage. On chains, shops and networks. Strategic Management Journal 19(5), 413–417 (1998)
Hayward, S.: Gartner Group. Business Process Fusion: Enabling the Real-Time Enterprise (October 16, 2003)
McDonald, M., Rowsell-Jones, A.: Gartner Group. Agility and Efficiency: Business Process Fusion (April 2004)
Soanes, M.G.: Process Design Strategies to Address Breadth and Depth Complexity. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Chew, E., Hawryszkiewycz, I., Soanes, M.: Value Configuration Design – an evolution in adequate business process design. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Ould, M.: Business Process Management: A Rigorous Approach (2005)
Gootzit, D., Valdes, R., Phifer, G.: Gartner Group. RAS Core Research Note (December 13, 2006)
Reijers, H., Van Der Aalst, W.: The effectiveness of workflow management systems: Predictions and lessons learned. International Journal of Information Management (2005)
Hailpern, B., Tarr, P.: Model-driven development: The good, the bad, and the ugly. IBM Systems Journal 45(3), 451–462 (2006)
Object Management Group. MDA Guide V1.0.1, http://www.omg.org
Giaglis, G.M.: A Taxonomy of Business Process Modeling and Information Systems Modeling Techniques. The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 13, 209–228 (2001)
Huff, K.E.: Software Process Modeling. In: Fuggetta, A., Wolf, A. (eds.) Trends in Software Process, pp. 1–24. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1996)
Ross, R.G.: Principles of the Business Rules Approach (2003)
Fielding, R.T.: Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine (2000)
zur Muehlen, M.: Standards Landscape, at http://www.workflow-research.de
Michelson, B.: Patricia Seybold Group. In: Event Driven Architecture Overview, 2nd edn. (February 2006)
Schulte, R.W.: Gartner Group. The Growing Role of Events in Enterprise Applications (July 9, 2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chew, E., Hawryszkiewycz, I., Soanes, M. (2008). Modeling Requirements for Value Configuration Design. In: ter Hofstede, A., Benatallah, B., Paik, HY. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4928. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78238-4_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78238-4_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78237-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78238-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)