Skip to main content

Residual Checking of Safety Properties

  • Conference paper
Model Checking Software (SPIN 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5156))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Program analysis and verification techniques have made great strides, yet, as every researcher in the field will admit it is easy to find a program and property for which a given technique is not cost-effective. Investigating the conventional wisdom that programs are mostly correct, we have observed that even failed program analyses usually produce a wealth of information about the parts of the program that operate correctly. Leveraging this information can help focus subsequent analysis and verification activities to make them more cost-effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hoare, T.: The verifying compiler: A grand challenge for computing research. J. ACM 50, 63–69 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Randell, B., Lee, P.A., Treleaven, P.C.: Reliability issues in computing system design. ACM Comput. Surv. 10, 123–165 (1978)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. DeMillo, R.A., Lipton, R.J., Sayward, F.G.: Hints on test data selection: Help for the practicing programmer. Computer 11, 34–41 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dwyer, M.B., Purandare, R.: Residual dynamic typestate analysis: exploiting static analysis results to reformulate and reduce the cost of dynamic analysis. In: 22nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2007), Atlanta, Georgia, USA, November 5-9, 2007, pp. 124–133 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Strom, R.E., Yemini, S.: Typestate: A programming language concept for enhancing software reliability. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 12, 157–171 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lal, A., Kidd, N., Reps, T.W., Touili, T.: Abstract error projection. In: Riis Nielson, H., Filé, G. (eds.) SAS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4634, pp. 200–217. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Wolfe, M.: High performance compilers for parallel computing. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Klaus Havelund Rupak Majumdar Jens Palsberg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dwyer, M.B., Purandare, R. (2008). Residual Checking of Safety Properties. In: Havelund, K., Majumdar, R., Palsberg, J. (eds) Model Checking Software. SPIN 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5156. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85114-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85114-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85113-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85114-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics