Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abu-Farsakh MY, Voyiadjis GZ, Tumay MT (1998) Numerical analysis on the miniature piezocone penetration tests (PCPT) in clays. Int J Numer Analyt Meth Geomech 22:791–818
ASTM D6001, Standard guide for direct-push water sampling for geoenvironmental investigations. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, v.04.08
ASTM D6724, Standard guide for installation of direct push ground water monitoring wells. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, v.04.08
ASTM D6725, Standard practice for direct-push installation of prepacked screen monitoring wells in unconsolidated aquifers. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, v.04.08
Baligh MM, Levadoux JN (1980) Pore pressure dissipation after cone penetration. Report R80-11 Dept of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Binley A, Daily W, Ramirez A (1997) Detecting leaks from environmental barriers using electrical current imaging. J of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics 2:11-21
Beck FP, Clark PJ, Puls RW (2000) Location and characterization of subsurface anomalies using a soil conductivity probe. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 20:55-59
Bujewski G, Rutherford B (1997) The Rapid Optical Screening Tool (ROST TM) Laser-Induced Fluorescence (LIF) System for screening of petroleum hydrocarbons in subsurface soils. — US EPA Innovative Technology Verification Report EPA/600/R-97/020
Butler JJ Jr (1998) The design, performance, and analysis of slug tests. Boca Raton, Lewis Publishers
Butler JJ Jr (2002) A simple correction for slug tests in small-diameter wells. Ground Water 40:303-307
Butler JJ Jr, Dietrich P (2004) New methods for high-resolution characterization of spatial variations in hydraulic conductivity. In: Proc. of International Symposium on Hydrogeological Investigation and Remedial Technology, National Central University, Jhongli, Taiwan, pp. 42-55
Butler JJ Jr, Healey JM, McCall GW, Garnett EJ, Loheide SP (2002) Hydraulic tests with direct-push equipment. Ground Water 40:25-36
Chiang CY, Loos KR, Klopp RA (1992) Field determination of geological / chemical properties of an aquifer by cone penetrometry and headspace analysis. Ground Water 30:428-436
Dietrich P (1999) Konzeption und Auswertung gleichstromgeoelektrischer Tracerversuche unter Verwendung von Sensitivitätskoeffizienten.- Tübinger Geowissenschaftliche Arbeiten (TGA), Reihe C, ISSN 0935-4948, Nr. 50:130
Dietrich P, Butler JJ Jr, Yaramanci U, Wittig V, Tiggelmann T, Schoofs S (2003) Field comparison of direct-push approaches for determination of K-profiles. Eos 84: F661
Elsworth D (1991) Dislocation analysis of penetration in saturated porous media. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 117: 391-408
Elsworth D (1993) Analysis of piezocone dissipation data using dislocation methods. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 119: 1601-1623
Farrar JA (1996) Research and standardization needs for direct push technology applied to environmental site characterization. In: Sampling Environmental Media, ed. by Morgan, J. H., ASTM Special Technical Publication 1282, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia:, pp 93-107
Fejes I, Szabadvary, Vero L (1997) Geophysikalische Penetrationssondierungen, In: Knödel K, Krummel H, Lange G, Handbuch zur Erkundung des Untergrundes von Deponien und Altlasten, Bd. 3 - Geophysik, pp 897-922
Henebry BJ, Robbins GA (2000) Reducing the influence of skin effects on hydraulic conductivity determinations in multilevel samplers installed with direct push methods. Ground Water 38: 882-886
Hinsby K, Bjerg PL, Andersen LJ, Skov B, Clausen EV (1992) A mini slug test method for determination of a local hydraulic conductivity of an unconfined sandy aquifer. Journal of Hydrology 136: 87-106
Jacobs JA, Kram M, Lieberman S (2000) Direct push technology sampling methods, In: Standard Handbook of Environmental Science, Health, and Technology, ed. by Lehr, J., McGraw Hill, pp. 11.151-11.163
Kram ML, Lorenzana D; Michaelsen J; Major W, Parker L; Antwort C; McHale T (2003) Direct-push wells prove effective for long-term ground water monitoring. Water Well Journal 57:16 - 19
Kram M (2001). Direct-push versus HSA drilled monitoring wells. RPM News, Spring 2001:6-7
Kram ML, Lieberman SH, Fee J, Keller AA (2001a) Use of LIF for real-time insitu mixed NAPL source zone detection. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 21:67-76
Kram ML., Lorenzana D, Michaelsen J, Lory E (2001b) Performance comparison: direct-push wells versus drilled wells. Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center Technical Report, TR-2120-ENV, January 2001
Kram ML (1998) Use of SCAPS Petroleum Hydrocarbon Sensor Technology for real-time indirect DNAPL detection. Journal of Soil Contamination 7:73-86
Lambson M, Jaobs PA (1995) The use of the Laser Induced Fluorescence Cone for environmental investigations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Cone Penetration Testing, CPT ’95, Linköping, Sweden
Lowry W, Mason N, Chipman V, Kisiel K, Stockton J (1999) In-situ permeability measurements with direct push techniques: Phase II topical report, SEASFTR- 98-207 Rept to DOE Federal Energy Tech Center
Lunne T, Robertson PK, Powell JJM (1997) Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice. London, Blackie Academic and Professional
Mason N, Lowry W (1999) In-situ permeability measurements with direct push techniques: Phase III topical report, SEASF-TR-99-223 DOE Fed Energy Tech Center
McCall W, Butler JJ Jr, Healey JM, Lanier AA, Sellwood SM, Garnett EJ (2002) A dual-tube direct-push method for vertical profiling of hydraulic conductivi12ty in unconsolidated formations. Environmental and Engineering Geoscience: 8:75-84
Neuhaus M (2001) Spatial In Situ Delineation of Soil and Groundwater Contamination with Environmental CPT. In: Proceedings of the conference "Field Screening Europe 2001", Karlsruhe, Germany, pp 71-78
Nielsen BJ (1994) New tools to locate and characterize oil spills in aquifers. Symposium on Natural Attenuation of Ground Water, EPA/600/R-94/162
Pitkin SE (1998) Detailed subsurface characterization using the Waterloo Profiler. Proc of the 1998 Symp on the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems, EEGS, pp 53-64
Pitkin SE, Cherry JA, Ingleton RA, Broholm M (1999) Field demonstrations using the Waterloo Ground Water Profiler. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 19:122-131
Pitkin SE, Rossi MD (2000) A real time indicator of hydraulic conductivity distribution used to select groundwater sampling depths (abstract). Eos 81:239
Ramirez A, Daily W, LaBrecque D, Owen E, Chesnut D (1993) Monitoring of an underground steam injection process using electrical resistance tomography. Water Resources Research: 29:73-87
Robertson PK (1990) Soil classification using the cone penetration test. Can Geotech. J 27: 151-158
Robertson PK, Campanella RG (1983a) Interpretation of cone penetration tests: Part I: Sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 20:719-733
Robertson PK, Campanella RG (1983b) Interpretation of cone penetration tests: Part II: Clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 20:734-745
Robertson PK, Campanella RG, Gillespie D, Greig J (1986a) Use of piezometer cone data. Proc. ASCE Spec. Conf. In Situ ’86. Use of In Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering. Blacksburg, pp 1263-1280
Robertson PK, Campanella RG, Gillespie D, Rice A (1986b) Seismic CPT to measure in situ shear wave velocity. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 112:791-803
Robertson PK, Sully JP, Woeller DJ, Lunne T, Powell JJM, Gillespie DG (1992) Estimating coefficient of consolidation from piezocone tests. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 29:539-550
Rogge M, Christy TM, De Weirdt F (2001) Site Contamination Fast De-lineation and Screening Using the Membrane Interface Probe. In: Proceedings "Field Screening Europe 2001", Karlsruhe, Germany, pp 91-98
Scaturo DM, Widdowson MA (1997) Experimental evaluation of a drive-point ground-water sampler for hydraulic conductivity measurement. Ground Water 35:713-720
Schulmeister MK, Butler JJ Jr, Healey JM, Zheng L, Wysocki DA, McCall GW (2003) Direct-push electrical conductivity logging for high-resolution hydrostratigraphic characterization. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 23:52-62
Schulmeister MK, Healey JM, Butler JJ Jr, McCall GW (2004) Direct-push geochemical profiling for assessment of inorganic chemical heterogeneity in aquifers. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 69:215-232
Sellwood SM, Healey JM, Birk S, Butler JJ Jr (2005) Direct-push hydrostratigraphic profiling: Coupling electrical logging and slug tests. Ground Water 43:19-29
Smolley M, Kappmeyer JC (1991) Cone penetrometer tests and Hydro-Punch sampling: A screening technique for plume definition. Ground Water Monitoring Review 11:101-106
Sørensen K (1989) A method for measurement of the electrical formation resistivity while auger drilling. First break 7:403-407
Sørensen K, Pellerin L, Auken E (2003) An auger tool to estimate hydraulic conductivity using a resistivity analogy. ASEG 16th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, February 2003, Adelaide
Spies BR, Ellis RG (1995) Cross-borehole resistivity tomography of a pilot-scale, in-situ vitrification test. Geophysics 60:886-898
Sully JP, Robertson PK, Campanella R, Woeller DJ. (1999) An approach to evaluation of field CPTU dissipation data in overconsolidated fine-grained soils. Can. Geotech. J. 36:369-381
Terry TA, Woeller DJ, Robertson PK (1996) Engineering soil parameters from seismic cone penetrometer tests; an overview. In: Bell RS; Cramer MH (Eds.) Proceedings of the symposium on the Application of geophysics to engineering and environmental problems pp 1279-1287
Thornton D, Ita K, Larson K (1997) Broader use of innovative ground water access technologies. In: Superfund XVIII Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2
Tillman N, Leonard L (1993) Vehicle mounted direct push systems, sampling tools and case histories: An overview of an emerging technology, In: Proc. of the 1993 meeting on Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water, Ground Water Management 17, pp 177-188
U.S. A.C.E. - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (1996) Tri-service site characterization and analysis penetrometer system. Eng. Tech. Letter 1110-1-171
U.S. EPA (1995) Rapid Optical Screen Tool (ROST). — Innovative Technology Verification Report EPA/540/R-95/519
U.S. EPA (1998) Environmental Technology Verification Report – Soil Sampling Technology – Art’s Manufacturing and Supply – AMS Dual Tube Liner Sampler –EPA 600R-98/093
Van den Boogaart J, van Deen JK, Kinneging NA, Meyer JG, van Ree CC (2001) The camera cone as an effective site screening tool. In: Proceedings "Field Screening Europe 2001", Karlsruhe, Germany, pp 107-111
Voyiadjis GZ, Song CR (2003) Determination of hydraulic conductivity using piezocone penetration test. International Journal of Geomechanics 3:217-224
White PA (1994) Electrode arrays for measuring groundwater flow direction and velocity. Geophysics 59:192-201
White PA (1988) Measurement of ground-water parameters using salt-water injection and surface resistivity. Groundwater 6:179-186
Zemo DA, Pierce YG, Gallinatti JD (1994) Cone penetrometer testing and discrete- depth ground water sampling techniques: A cost-effective method of site characterization in a multiple-aquifer setting. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 14:176-182
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dietrich, P., Leven, C. (2009). Direct push-technologies. In: Kirsch, R. (eds) Groundwater Geophysics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88405-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88405-7_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88404-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88405-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)