Skip to main content

Electromagnetic methods – frequency domain

Airborne techniques

  • Chapter
Groundwater Geophysics

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahl A (2003) Automatic 1D inversion of multifrequency airborne electromagnetic data with artificial neural networks: discussion and case study. Geophysical Prospecting 51:89-97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson WL (1989) A hybrid fast Hankel transform algorithm for electromagnetic modelling. Geophysics 54:263-266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avdeev DB, Kuvshinov AV, Pankratov OV, Newman GA (1998) Threedimensional frequency-domain modelling of airborne electromagnetic responses. Exploration Geophysics 29:111-119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamish D (2003) Airborne EM footprints. Geophysical Prospecting 51:49-60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beard LP, Nyquist JE (1998) Simultaneous inversion of airborne electromagnetic data for resistivity and magnetic permeability. Geophysics 63:1556-1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch FP, Gurk M (2000) Comparison of RF-EM, RMT and SP measurements on a karstic terrain in the Jura Mountains (Switzerland). Proceed. of the Seminar Electromagnetische Tiefenforschung Deutsche Geophysikalische Gesellschaft:51-59

    Google Scholar 

  • Fluche B, Sengpiel KP (1997) Grundlagen und Anwendungen der Hubschrauber- Geophysik. In: Beblo M (ed) Umweltgeophysik, Ernst und Sohn, Berlin pp 363-393

    Google Scholar 

  • Fluche B, Siemon B, Grinat M (1998) Transfer of airborne electromagnetic interpretation methods to ground horizontal loop electromagnetic (HLEM) measurements. In: Proceedings of EAGE, 60th Conference & Technical Exhibition, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser DC (1978) Resistivity mapping with an airborne multicoil electromagnetic system. Geophysics 43:144-172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht FC (1967) Fields about an oscillating magnetic dipole over a twolayer earth, and application to ground and airborne electromagnetic surveys. Q Col Sch Mines 62

    Google Scholar 

  • Fountain D (1998) Airborne electromagnetic systems – 50 years of development. Geophysical Prospecting 29:1-11

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel G, Kirsch R, Siemon B, Wiederhold H (2003) Geophysical investigation of Pleistocene valleys in Northern Germany. Journal of Applied Geophysics 53:159-180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grissemann Ch, Ludwig R (1986) Recherche sur la fracturation profonde en zone de socle cristllin a partir de forage a gros debit et de lineaments landsat a l áide de methodes geophysiques avancees. Cooperation techniques projet no. 82.2060.0, Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Hannover

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Fraser DC (2003) Inversion of helicopter electromagnetic data to a magnetic conductive layered earth. Geophysics 68:1211-1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson P, Barta LS (2002) VLF surveying to delineate longwall mine-induced fractures. The Leading Edge 21:491-493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hördt A, Greinwald S, Schaumann G, Tezkan B, Hoheisel A (2000) Joint 3D interpretation of radiomagnetotelluric (RMT) and transient electromagnetic (TEM) data from an industrial waste deposit in Mellendorf, Germany. European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 4:151-170

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson HK, Sørenson K (1979) The fast Hankel transform. Geophysical Prospecting 27:876-901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuster H, Meyer KD (1979) Glaziäre Rinnen im mittleren und nordöstlichen Niedersachsen. Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart 29:135-156

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill JD (1980) Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurements at low induction numbers. Geonics Technical Note TN-6

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill JD (1990) Use of Electromagnetic Methods for Groundwater Studies. In. Ward SH (ed) Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics, vol 1. Soc Expl Geophys, Tulsa, pp 191–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundry E (1984) On the interpretation of airborne electromagnetic data for the two-layer case. Geophysical Prospecting 32:336-346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmann GA, Alumbaugh DL (1995) Frequency-domain modelling of airborne electromagnetic responses using staggered finite differences. Geophysical Prospecting 43:1021-1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian W, Gamey TJ, Holladay JS, Lewis R, Abernathy D (1997) Inversion of airborne electromagnetic data using an Occam technique to resolve a variable number of multiple layers. Proceedings from the High-Resolution Geophysics 178 Reinhard Kirsch Workshop, Laboratory of Advanced Subsurface Imaging (LASI), Univ of Arizona, Tucson, CD-ROM

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki Y (2001) Full 3D inversion of electromagnetic data on PC. Journal of Applied Geophysics 46:45-54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidel K (2005) Elektromagnetische Zweispulen-Systeme, Prinzip der Methode. In: Knödel K, Krummel K, Lange G (eds) Handbuch zur Erkundung des Untergrundes von Deponien und Altlasten, Bd 3 Geophysik. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg NewYork, pp 241-265

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengpiel KP, Siemon B (1998) Examples of 1D inversion of multifrequency AEM data from 3D resistivity distributions. Exploration Geophysics 29:133-141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengpiel KP, Siemon B (2000) Advanced inversion methods for airborne electromagnetic exploration. Geophysics 65:1983-1992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemon B (2001) Improved and new resistivity-depth profiles for helicopter electromagnetic data. Journal of Applied Geophysics 46:65-76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemon B (2007) Levelling of frequency-domain helicopter-borne electromagnetic data. Journal of Applied Geophysics doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2007.11.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemon B, Binot F (2002) Aerogeophysikalische Erkundung von Salzwasserintrusionen und Küstenaquiferen im Gebiet Bremerhaven- Cuxhaven – Verifizierung der AEM-Ergebnisse. In: Hördt A, Stoll JB (eds) Protokoll über das Kolloquium Elektromagnetische Tiefensondierung Burg Ludwigstein, pp 319-328

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemon B, Eberle DG, Binot F (2004) Helicopter-borne electromagnetic investigation of coastal aquifers in North-West Germany. Zeitschrift für Geologische Wissenschaften 32:385-395

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemon B, Auken E, Christiansen AV (2007) Laterally constrained inversion of frequency-domain helicopter-borne electromagnetic data. Journal of Applied Geophysics doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2007.11.003

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer A, Siemon B, Auken E (200) A comparison of helicopter-borne electromagnetics in frequency- and time-domain at the Cuxhaven valley in Northern Germany. Journal of Applied Geophysics doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2007.7.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuntebeck C (2003) Three-dimensional electromagnetic modelling by free-decay mode superposition. PhD thesis, TU Braunschweig

    Google Scholar 

  • Tølbøll RJ, Christensen NB (2006) Robust 1D inversion and analysis of helicopter electro-magnetic (HEM) data. Geophysics 71:G53-62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valleau N (2000) HEM data processing – a practival overview. Exploration Geophysics 31:584-594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wait JR (1982) Geo-electromagnetism. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward SH, Hohmann GW (1988) Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications. In: Nabighian MN (ed), Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics, vol 1, Theory. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, IG no 3, Tulsa, pp 130-310

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong Z, Tripp AC (1995) Electromagnetic scattering of large structures in layered earth using integral equations. Radio Science 30:921-929

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Siemon, B. (2009). Electromagnetic methods – frequency domain. In: Kirsch, R. (eds) Groundwater Geophysics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88405-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics