Skip to main content

Planning Actions with Social Consequences

  • Conference paper
Agent Computing and Multi-Agent Systems (PRIMA 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5044))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 708 Accesses

Abstract

In an environment with multiple autonomous agents, the performance of an action may have effects on the beliefs and goals of the witnessing agents in addition to the direct effects. The awareness of such mental effects is critical for the success of a plan in multi-agent environments. This paper provides a formulation of social plans, and show that social planning can be done by including models of other agents’ minds in the planning domain. A social planning agent is constructed based on automatic generation of PDDL (Planning Domain Description Language) domains from knowledge about other agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barros, L.M., Musse, S.R.: Planning algorithms for interactive storytelling. Comput. Entertain. 5 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bibel, W.: Let’s Plan it Deductively! Artif. Intell. 103, 183–208 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Castelfranchi, C.: Modeling Social Actions for AI agents. Artif. Intel. 103, 157–182 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, P.H.-M., Chien, Y.-H., Kao, E.C.-C., Soo, V.-W.: A Knowledge-Based Scenario Framework to Support Intelligent Planning Characters. In: Panayiotopoulos, T., Gratch, J., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Olivier, P., Rist, T. (eds.) IVA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3661, pp. 134–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Coles, A.I., Smith, A.J.: Marvin: Macro-actions from reduced versions of the instance. In: IPC4 Booklet, Fourteenth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cox, J., Durfee, E.H.: An Efficient Algorithm for Multiagent Plan Coordination. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2005), pp. 828–835. ACM Press, NY (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Edelkamp, S., Hoffmann, J.: PDDL2.2: The Language for the Classical Part of the 4th International Planning Competition. Technical Report 195. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Institut für Informatik, Freiburg, Germany (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Field, D., Ramsay, A.: How to Change a Person’s Mind: Understanding the Difference between the Effects and Consequences of Speech Acts. In: Proceedings of 5th Workshop on Inference in Computational Semantics (IcoS-5), Buxton, England, pp. 27–36 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grosz, B., Hunsberger, L., Kraus, S.: Planning and Acting Together. AI Magazine 20, 23–34 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: Plan Analysis for Autonomous Sociological Agents. In: Castelfranchi, C., Lespérance, Y. (eds.) ATAL 2000. LNCS, vol. 1986, pp. 182–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: Motivated behaviour for goal adoption. In: Zhang, C., Lukose, D. (eds.) DAI 1998. LNCS, vol. 1544, pp. 58–73. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. McDermott, D., Ghallab, M., Howe, A., Knoblock, C., Ram, A., Veloso, M., Weld, D., Wilkins, D.: PDDL - The Planning Domain Definition Language. Technical Report CVC TR-98-003/DCS TR-1165. Yale Center for Computational Vision and Control (1998), http://www.cs.yale.edu/~dvm

  13. McDermott, D.: The Optop Planner. In: IPC4 Booklet, Fourteenth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Riedl, M.O., Young, R.M.: An Intent-Driven Planner for Multi-Agent Story Generation. In: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), pp. 186–193. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rowe, N., Andrade, S.: Counterplanning for Multi-agent Plans using Stochastic Means-Ends Analysis. In: Proceedings of the IASTED Artificial Intelligence and Applications Conference, pp. 405–441 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chang, HM., Soo, VW. (2009). Planning Actions with Social Consequences. In: Ghose, A., Governatori, G., Sadananda, R. (eds) Agent Computing and Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5044. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01639-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01639-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01638-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01639-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics