Abstract
One of the consequences of the Subprime crisis is the accentuated need for financial innovations, which allow for the proper evaluation of investment projects. In this chapter, the innovation of using variable interest rates in real options pricing methods is presented in theory as well as in practice. The big advantage of these methods over the traditional Net Present Value (NPV) approach is that they allow to include the project’s optionalities into its evaluation. But traditional methods of real options pricing use a constant risk-free interest rate for discounting. This is clearly not appropriate when looking at long-term projects, typical examples of which are pharmaceutical R&D projects or oil drilling endeavors. The longer the runtime of a project, the more options are likely to arise. This was particularly obvious in the last decade, when the interest rate development showed steady upward trends followed by abrupt downward movements. There is no doubt that movements like these have a strong impact on the evaluation of investment projects. This chapter describes one method of how to determine non-constant risk-free rates and presents two case studies that analyzed various types of real options.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This function is not the short-rate process (r t ) t≥0, which will be introduced later, but just a time-dependent function.
- 2.
References
Alvarez, L.H.R., & Koskela, E. (2002). Irreversible investment and interest rate variability (Working Paper). Turku: Turku School of Economics and Business Administration. 6 May 2002.
Clewlow, L., & Strickland, C. (1998). Implementing derivatives models. Chichester: Wiley.
Cox, J. C., Ross, S. A., & Rubinstein, M. (1979). Option pricing: A simplified approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 229–263.
Danis, M.A., & Pennington-Cross, A. (2005). The delinquency of subprime mortgages (Working Paper 2005-022A). St. Louis: The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (2006). The rise in homeownership. FRBSF Economic Letter Number 2006-30. San Francisco, 3 Nov 2006.
Ho, T. S. Y., & Lee, S. B. (1986). Term structure movements and pricing interest rate contingent claims. The Journal of Finance, 41, 1011–1029.
Hommel, U., Scholich, M., & Baecker, P. N. (2003). Reale optionen. Berlin: Springer.
Hull, J. C. (1997). Options, futures, and other derivatives (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hull, J. C., & White, A. (1994). Numerical procedures for implementing term structure models I: Single-factor models. Journal of Derivatives, 2, 7–16.
Ingersoll, J. E., Jr., & Ross, S. A. (1992). Waiting to invest: Investment and uncertainty. Journal of Business, 65(1), 1–29.
Klyuev, V., & Mills, P. (2007). Is housing wealth an ‘ATM’? International Monetary Fund (IMF) Staff Papers, 54(3), 539–561.
Miltersen, K. R. (2000). Valuation of natural resource investments with stochastic convenience yields and interest rates. In M. J. Brennan & L. Trigeorgis (Eds.), Project flexibility, agency, and competition (pp. 183–204). New York: Oxford University Press.
Miltersen, K.R., & Schwartz, S.E. (1998). Pricing of options on commodity futures with stochastic term structures of convenience yields and interest rates (Finance Working Paper, 5–97). UCLA: The John E. Anderson Graduate School of Management.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.
Schulmerich, M. (2003). Einsatz und pricing von realoptionen. In U. Hommel, M. Scholich, & P. N. Baecker (Eds.), Real options (pp. 63–96). Heidelberg: Springer.
Schulmerich, M. (2005). Real options valuation (1st ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.
Schulmerich, M. (2010). Real options valuation (2nd ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.
Trigeorgis, L. (1991). A log-transformed binomial analysis method for valuing complex multi-option investments. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26(3), 310.
Vasicek, O. (1977). An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 177–188.
Vollrath, R. (2001). Die Berücksichtigung von Handlungsflexibilität bei Investitionsentscheidungen – Eine empirische Untersuchung. In U. Hommel, M. Scholich, & R. Vollrath (Eds.), Published in realoptionen in der Unternehmenspraxis (pp. 45–77). Heidelberg: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schulmerich, M. (2011). Creating Corporate Value with the Exposure to Financial Innovations: The Case of Interest Rates. In: Hommel, U., Fabich, M., Schellenberg, E., Firnkorn, L. (eds) The Strategic CFO. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04349-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04349-9_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04348-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04349-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)