Skip to main content

e-Research in International Cooperation Networks in Science and Technology Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
e-Research Collaboration

Abstract

This chapter discusses the methodology that has been developed and the lessons learned in a case study aimed at enhancing the role of e-Research in assisting and nurturing existing and emerging Communities of Practice (CoPs) in International Cooperation in Science and Technology and Innovation Research. International Scientific and Technical Cooperation among geographically dispersed partners, possibly belonging to different economic and cultural environments, constitutes a challenging endeavour. The proposed methodology involves the application of innovative Knowledge Management (KM) strategies and processes based on the intensive use of the new e-Collaboration tools to favour the establishment of Virtual CoPs (VCoPs), a type of social networks where knowledge sharing and exchange processes occur across organizational, cultural and international boundaries. The methodology has been applied to several projects within the scope of the different European Union Programmes on Scientific and Technological Cooperation with Mediterranean Partner Countries. The chapter includes (1) An analysis of the contextual framework; (2) The design, implementation and maintenance of an Organizational KM Strategy; (3) The development of appropriate e-Collaboration tools; (4) The proposal of an assessment analysis model of the impact of these initiatives; and (5) The conclusions and lessons learned in these projects. The latter include the practical importance of some key KM issues such as mutual trust and acceptance of the e-collaboration technology-platform, the need to enhance participation efficiency and to foster members’ commitment, the complexity of the relationships within international cooperation initiatives and the key role of an effective governance mechanism for the sustainable functioning of these VCoPs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ASBIMED Project. Assessment of the bilateral scientific co-operation between the EU-MS, Accession Countries, Candidate Countries and the MPC. Funded by the European Union 6th Framework Programme FP6-INCO-CT-2004-510659. http://www.asbimed.net

  • Barcelona Declaration and Euro-Mediterranean Partnership. (1995). Retrieved from http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/lvb/r15001.htm

  • Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic Web. Scientific American.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, M., Engelbart, D., Furuta, R., Hiltz, S. R., Noll, J., Preece, J., et al. (2002). Toward virtual community knowledge evolution. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 11–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontis, N., Dragonetti, N. C., Jacobsen, K., & Roos, G. (1999). The knowledge toolbox: A review of the tools available to measure and manage intangible resources. European Management Journal, 4, 391–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickley, D. (1999). Semantic Web history: Nodes and arcs 1989–1999. The WWW proposal and RDF. Retrieved from http://www.w3c.org/1999/11/11– WWWProposal/

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). Organizational learning and community-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. In R. Cross & S. Israelit (Eds.), Strategic learning in a knowledge economy. Woburn: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital. Realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUMEDIS Project. Retrieved from http://www.eumedis.net

  • EUROMEDANET 1 & 2 Projects. Retrieved from http://www.euromedanet.gr

  • EU Directorate General on RTD [DG-RTD]. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/research/index_en.html

  • EU International Policy on Science and Technology (INCO-RTD). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/iscp/index_en.cfm

  • González-Aranda, J. M., Rodríguez-Clemente, R., & Lozano, S. (2008). A case study of communities of practice and ICT tools in knowledge management on international cooperation in science and technology research. Webist, 2, 415–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Virtualness and knowledge in trams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27, 265–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, A. S. (1990). Mapping strategic thought. In: Huff, A.S. (Ed.) Mapping strategic thought. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 11–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitan, K. B. (1982). Information resources as “goods” in the life cycle of information production. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33, 44–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 179–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loebbecke, C., & van Fenema, P. (2000). Virtual organizations that cooperate and compete: Managing the risks of knowledge exchange. In Y. Malhotra (Ed.), Knowledge management and virtual organizations (pp. 162–180). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L. (2001). Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 27–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • MED 7 Project. Thematic workshops for the definition of the science and technology Euro-Mediterranean policy within FP7. Funded by the European Union 6th Framework Programme FP6-2002-INCO-COMultilatRTD/SSA-5. Retrieved from http://www.asbimed.net/MED7/HOME.htm

  • MELIA Coordination Action Project. Retrieved from official website http://www.meliaproject.eu

  • Minch, M. (2008). EUR 23191 – INCO-NET projects – Supporting international science and technology cooperation with major regions of the world. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIRA Coordination Action Project. Retrieved from official website http://www.miraproject.eu

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (Vol. 12, pp. 295–336). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Clemente, R., & González-Aranda, J. M. (2007). Euro-Mediterranean scientific cooperation: Facts, obstacles and solutions using ICTs. Practical Cases. MED. Barcelona, Spain: IEMed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teigland, R. (2003). Knowledge networking: Structure and performance in networks of practice. Published doctoral dissertation, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, S., Poteet, S. R., Kao, A., & Quach, L. (2006). Dissemination in portals. In D. G. Schwartz (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management. (pp. 115–121) Hershey: Idea Group Reference.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter has been funded by project INCONET MIRA “Mediterranean Innovation and Research Coordination Action”, contract FP7-INCO-2007-1-211359 and project MELIA “Mediterranean Dialogue on Integrated Water Management” Coordination Action, contract FP6-INCO-CT-2006-517612.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Miguel González-Aranda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix. Glossary of Key Terms Used, Their Acronyms and Definitions

Appendix. Glossary of Key Terms Used, Their Acronyms and Definitions

Acronym

Key term

Definition

CKO

Chief Knowledge Officer

Person responsible for the design, implementation and management of an Organizational Knowledge Management Strategy (O-KMS) aligned to the business strategy of an organization

CMS

Content Management System

In general terms, a Content Management System is a computer application used to manage workflow needed to collaboratively create, edit, review, index, search, publish, archive and retrieve various types of digital contents

CoP

Community of Practice

Communities of practice are groups of people who share a concern, a set of problems, or a passion about a topic, and who deepen their knowledge and expertise in this area by interacting in an ongoing basis (Wenger et al. 2002)

CVS

Collaborative Virtual Space

On-line working area shared by VCoP members in order to develop their PRACTICE activities

INCONET

International Cooperation NET

Projects which aim, among other objectives, to foster the political dialogue and to seek synergy mechanisms for the assessment and implementation of effective cooperation policies in S&T research, development and innovation between the European Union Member States (EU-MS) and other World regions (Minch 2008)

LPP

Legitimate Peripheral Participation

Knowledge process consisting of how VCoP newcomers are welcome to participate in its Working Groups even if their positions in the social network are peripheral and their contributions marginal (Lave and Wenger 1991)

KM

Knowledge Management

A systematic process for acquiring, creating, integrating, sharing, and using information, insights, and experiences to achieve organizational goals and how to provide a disciplined and organized methodology for constant improvement and development of knowledge domains

O-KMS

Organizational Knowledge Management Strategy

Organization’s plan for modelling and applying knowledge-oriented resources (knowledge assets and knowledge processing capabilities) in the interest of supporting the organization’s purpose. This plan includes, among other activities: (1) To get a compilation of best practices, experiences, and skills (2) To oversee the concept, design, implementation and management of ICT supporting knowledge management (KM), e.g. Intranet, knowledge repositories, data warehouses, Groupware etc. (3) To globalize knowledge management, share and dissemination (transfer) and thus coordinate several existing KM initiatives as well as to measure the value of intangible assets

MPC

Mediterranean Partner Countries

The so-called Mediterranean Partner Countries are: Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Palestine, Syria, Tunisia and Turkey, where Israel and Turkey are also Associated Countries to the Framework Programme of the European Union

NoP

Network of Practice

A type of knowledge-based social network focused on work PRACTICE which may exist primarily through electronic communication (Brown and Duguid 2000; Teigland 2003)

SKA

Shared Knowledge Artefact

It provides common resources for VCoP members to focus their collaborative PRACTICE activities and to obtain facilitative feedback from each other about the current state of these activities

VCoP

Virtual Community of Practice

A type of knowledge-based social network whose members relies primarily on networked ICT to communicate in order to: (1) discuss problems and issues associated with their day-to-day activities; (2) collaborate on projects; (3) share documents, solutions, or good (and best) practices; plan for face-to-face meetings, or continue relationships and work beyond face-to-face events

WG

Working Group

Organizational work structure whose members have to carry out specific tasks, activities and deliverables according to certain time schedules. WGs use to follow a role-oriented scheme

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

González-Aranda, J.M., Rodríguez-Clemente, R., Lozano, S. (2010). e-Research in International Cooperation Networks in Science and Technology Research. In: Anandarajan, M., Anandarajan, M. (eds) e-Research Collaboration. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12257-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics