Skip to main content

Aligning the Constructs of Enterprise Ontology and Normalized Systems

  • Conference paper
Advances in Enterprise Engineering IV (CIAO! 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 49))

Abstract

Literature suggests that, due to their complexity, organizations need to be designed in order to be effective and evolvable. Recently, two promising approaches have been introduced that are relevant in this regard. Enterprise Ontology creates essential models that are implementation-independent. Normalized Systems is concerned with the development of information systems with proven evolvability. In this paper, we combine both approaches. To this end, we express the transaction pattern—a central construct of Enterprise Ontology—using the constructs of Normalized Systems. By aligning these constructs, we attempt to introduce traceability between the Enterprise Ontology level and the Normalized Systems level. The resulting artefact exhibits the benefits of both Enterprise Ontology and Normalized Systems. We illustrate the application of the artefact in the context of enterprise architectures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Auramäki, E., Hirschheim, R., Lyytinen, K.: Modelling offices through discourse analysis: the sampo approach. Computer Journal 35(4), 342–352 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dietz, J.L.: Enterprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Dijkstra, E.: Go to statement considered harmful. Communications of the ACM 11(3), 147–148 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eick, S.G., Graves, T.L., Karr, A.F., Marron, J., Mockus, A.: Does code decay? assessing the evidence from change management data. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 27(1), 1–12 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldkuhl, G.: Generic business frameworks and action modeling. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Communication Modeling—Language/Action Perspective 1996, Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hammer, M.: Reengineering work: Don’t automate, obliterate. Harvard Business Review 68(4), 104 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering (The Enterprise Engineering Series), 1st edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lehman, M.: Programs, life cycles, and laws of software evolution. Proceedings of the IEEE 68, 1060–1076 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lehman, M.M., Ramil, J.F.: Rules and tools for software evolution planning and management. Annals of Software Engineering 11(1), 15–44 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leist, S., Zellner, G.: Evaluation of current architecture frameworks. In: SAC 2006: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing, pp. 1546–1553. ACM, New York (2006), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1141277.1141635

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Mannaert, H., Verelst, J.: Normalized Systems—Re-creating Information Technology Based on Laws for Software Evolvability, Koppa, Kermt, Belgium (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mannaert, H., Verelst, J., Ven, K.: Exploring the concept of systems theoretic stability as a starting point for a unified theory on software engineering. In: Mannaert, H., Ohta, T., Dini, C., Pellerin, R. (eds.) Proceedings of Third International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA 2008), pp. 360–366. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Mulder, H.: Rapid enterprise design. Ph.D. thesis, TU Delft (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Parnas, D.L.: On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Communications of the ACM 15(12), 1053–1058 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van Reijswoud, V.: The structure of business communication: Theory, model and application. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van Nuffel, D., Mannaert, H., De Backer, C., Verelst, J.: Deriving normalized systems elements from business process models. In: International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, pp. 27–32 (2009), http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ICSEA.2009.13

  17. Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Addison Wesley, Reading (1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Huysmans, P., Bellens, D., Van Nuffel, D., Ven, K. (2010). Aligning the Constructs of Enterprise Ontology and Normalized Systems. In: Albani, A., Dietz, J.L.G. (eds) Advances in Enterprise Engineering IV. CIAO! 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 49. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13048-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13048-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13047-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13048-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics