Skip to main content

Including Notions of Fairness in Development of an Integrated Multi-agent Online Dispute Resolution Environment

  • Conference paper
Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications (KES-AMSTA 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6070))

Abstract

The paper describes the development of an integrated multi-agent online dispute resolution environment called IMODRE that was designed to assist parties involved in Australian family law disputes achieve legally fairer negotiated outcomes. The system extends our previous work in developing negotiation support systems Family_Winner and AssetDivider. In this environment one agent uses a Bayesian Belief Network expertly modeled with knowledge of the Australian Family Law domain to advise disputants of their Best Alternatives to Negotiated Agreements by way of a percentage property split. Another agent incorporates this percentage split into an integrative bargaining process and applies heuristics and game theory to equitably distribute marital property assets and facilitate further trade-offs. The purpose of the system is to add greater fairness to family property law negotiations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Walton, R., Mckersie, R.: A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations. McGraw-Hill, New York (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kersten, G.: Modeling Distributive and Integrative Negotiations. Review and Revised Characterization. Group Decision and Negotiation 10(6), 493–514 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher, R., Ury, W.: Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, Boston (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lax, D.A., Sebenius, J.: The Manager as Negotiator. The Free Press, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Darrwiche, A.: Modelling and Reasoning with Bayesian Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Relationships Australia Queensland, http://www.relationships.com.au/who-we-are/state-and-territory-organisations/qld

  8. Victoria Body Corporate Services, http://www.vbcs.com.au/

  9. Zeleznikow, J., Bellucci, E.: Family_Winner: integrating game theory and heuristics to provide negotiation support. In: Proceedings of Sixteenth International Conference on Legal Knowledge Based System, pp. 21–30. IOS Publications, Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bellucci, E.: Development of a Mediation Tool in Family Law: AssetDivider. In: Proceedings of JURIX: The Twenty-First Annual Conference, pp. 88–97. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Java Agent DEvelopment Framework, http://jade.tilab.com/

  12. MySQL, http://www.mysql.com/

  13. JDBC, http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/database/

  14. FIPA, http://www.fipa.org

  15. Fatima, S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.: An analysis of feasible solutions for multi-issue negotiation involving non-linear utility functions. In: Proceeding of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 1041–1048 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Oshrat, Y., Lin, R., Kraus, S.: Facing the challenge of human-agent negotiations via effective general opponent modeling. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Budapest, Hungary, vol. 1, pp. 377–384 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. JSP, http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/

  18. About Bayesian Networks, http://www.cra.com/pdf/BNetBuilderBackground.pdf

  19. Muecke, N., Stranieri, A., Miller, C.: Re-Consider: The Integration of Online Dispute Resolution and Decision Support Systems, Expanding the Horizons of ODR. In: Poblet, M. (ed.) Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Online Dispute Resolution, Florence, Italy, December 13. CEUR Workshop Proceedings Series (CEUR-WS.org), vol. 430, pp. 62–72 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Recursive Conditioning, http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/mkhkoivi/teaching/sumproductsfall05/presentations/parviainen.pdf

  21. Brams, S.J., Taylor, A.D.: Fair Division, from cake cutting to dispute resolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Adjusted Winner, 2010 for examples and to use the Adjusted Winner software, http://www.nyu.edu/projects/adjustedwinner/

  23. Cybersettle, http://www.cybersettle.com/pub/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abrahams, B., Zeleznikow, J. (2010). Including Notions of Fairness in Development of an Integrated Multi-agent Online Dispute Resolution Environment. In: Jędrzejowicz, P., Nguyen, N.T., Howlet, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications. KES-AMSTA 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6070. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13480-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13480-7_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13479-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13480-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics