Skip to main content

Using a First Order Logic to Verify That Some Set of Reals Has No Lesbegue Measure

  • Conference paper
Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6172))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents a formal proof of Vitali’s theorem that not all sets of real numbers can have a Lebesgue measure, where the notion of “measure” is given very general and reasonable constraints. A careful examination of Vitali’s proof identifies a set of axioms that are sufficient to prove Vitali’s theorem, including a first-order theory of the reals as a complete, ordered field, “enough” sets of reals, and the axiom of choice. The main contribution of this paper is a positive demonstration that the axioms and inference rules in ACL2(r), a variant of ACL2 with support for nonstandard analysis, are sufficient to carry out this proof.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cowles, J.: ACL2 book: Principle of dependent choices. Formal proof script available from author (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis, J.: Acl2-books repository. Presented at the ACL2 Workshop (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gamboa, R., Cowles, J.: Theory extension in ACL2(r). Journal of Automated Reasoning (May 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gamboa, R., Kaufmann, M.: Nonstandard analysis in ACL2. Journal of Automated Reasoning 27(4), 323–351 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldblatt, R.: Lectures on the Hyperreals: An Introduction to Nonstandard Analysis, ch. 16. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jech, T.J.: The Axiom of Choice, vol. 75. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaufmann, M., Moore, J.S.: Structured theory development for a mechanized logic. Journal of Automated Reasoning 26(2), 161–203 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Nelson, E.: Internal set theory: A new approach to nonstandard analysis. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 83, 1165–1198 (1977)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Royden, H.L.: Real Analysis, 2nd edn. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Solovay, R.M.: A model of set theory in which every set of reals is Lebesgue measurable. Annals of Mathematics 92, 1–56 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Vitali, G.: Sul problema della mesura dei gruppi di una retta (1905)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cowles, J., Gamboa, R. (2010). Using a First Order Logic to Verify That Some Set of Reals Has No Lesbegue Measure. In: Kaufmann, M., Paulson, L.C. (eds) Interactive Theorem Proving. ITP 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6172. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14052-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14052-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14051-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14052-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics