Abstract
A social dilemma lies behind many environmental problems, such as climate change. Analytically separating temporal aspects from structural aspects of the environmental dilemma prevents wrong conclusions. This article concentrates solely on the structural aspects with different grades of complexity and different grades of ignorance in the dilemma. Dilemmas with sufficient complexity, such as climate change, and/or ignorance of the stakeholders are extremely vulnerable to individual defections. Therefore, governance is an absolute must and institutions are necessary. However, controls and sanctioning are key factors of institutions. Consequently, psychological approaches should not only target the individuals, but integrate in a multidisciplinary programme that focuses on governance tasks with respect to (1) the structural diagnosis of the social dilemma of climate change; (2) didactic instruments and methods that give addressees an insight into these structural problems; (3) the role of governance for the stakeholders on internalizing norms; and (4) the impact of structural knowledge on accepting institutions that help to solve the structural part of the sustainability problem. Psychological research in institutional ergonomics could help to create addressee-friendly governance, where the addressees know about the value and adequacy of certain restrictions for the sake of common welfare and sustainability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beckenkamp M (2009) Environmental dilemmas revisited: structural consequences from the angle of institutional ergonomics. Max-Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn
Beckenkamp M, Hennig-Schmidt H, Maier-Rigaud F (2006) Cooperation in symmetric and asymmetric prisoner's dilemma games. Max-Planck-Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn
Brock WA, Xepapadeas A (2003) Valuing biodiversity from an economic perspective: a unified economic, ecological, and genetic approach. Am Econ Rev 93:1597–1614
Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912
Gardner GT, Stern PC (1996) Environmental problems and human behavior. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA
Gollwitzer M, Schmitt M, Schalke R, Maes J, Baer A (2005) Asymmetrical effects of justice sensitivity perspectives on prosocial and antisocial behaviour. Social Justice Res 18:183–201
Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248
Ittner H, Ohl C (2006) Playing fair within climate protection policy? – Bringing together psychological and economic methods. ICFAI J Environ Law 1:34–53
Liebrand WBG, Van Lange P, Messick DM (1996) Social Dilemmas. In: Manstead ASR, Hewstone M (eds) The Blackwell encyclopedia of social psychology, 1st edn. Blackwell, Oxford
Luce RD, Raiffa H (1957) Games and decisions. Wiley, New York
Magen S (2006) Zur Interaktion von Recht und sozialen Normen bei der dezentralen Bereitstellung von Gemeinschaftsgütern. Max-Planck-Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn
Magen S (in preparation) Gerechtigkeitserwartungen im Recht. Civil Law. University of Bonn
Milinski M, Sommerfeld RD, Krambeck H-J, Reed FA, Marotzke J (2008) The collective-risk social dilemma and the prevention of simulated dangerous climate change. PNAS 105:2291–2294
Ohl C, Johst K, Meyerhoff J, Beckenkamp M, Grüty sgen V, Drechsler M (2008) Long-term socio-ecological research (LTSER) in the context of biodiversity protection – a complex systems approach for the study of dynamic human-nature interactions. Ecological Complexity, Special Issue "Eco Summit 2007"
Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Poundstone W (1992) Prisoner’s Dilemma: John von Neumann, game theory, and the puzzle of the bomb. Doubleday, New York
Thogersen J (2008) Social norms and cooperation in real-life social dilemmas. J Econ Psychol 29:458–472
Van Lange PAM, Liebrand WB, Messick DM, Wilke HAM (1992) Social dilemmas: the state of the art. In: Liebrand WB, Messick DM, Wilke HAM (eds) Social dilemmas: theoretical issues and research findings, 1st edn. Pergamon, Oxford
Yamagishi T (1986) The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Social Psychol Quart 51:110–116
Acknowledgments
My current work is supported by the Krekeler Foundation. Its support is gratefully acknowledged. The linguistic assistance of Brian Cooper is highly appreciated; his support was extremely helpful.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Beckenkamp, M. (2011). The Social Dilemma of Climate Change: Socio-economic Implications. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) The Economic, Social and Political Elements of Climate Change. Climate Change Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14776-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14776-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14775-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14776-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)