Skip to main content

A Matter of (Natural) Laws

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Theory and the Creation Controversy

Science seeks to discover laws of nature. Historically, such laws of nature were understood as ‘secondary causes’, enacted by a ‘First Cause’. Such an understanding of natural laws resulted in the ‘metaphor of the two books’. The Creator revealed himself through the Book of Revelation as much as through the Book of Nature. Exhaustive knowledge of the laws of nature would lead all the way back to knowledge of the First Cause. On this account, the study of nature would provide insights into moral and ethical issues. The attempt to derive what ‘ought to be’ from what ‘just is’ constituted a major roadblock preventing the acceptance of a materialistic conception of nature in general, and of theories of species transformation based on nothing but natural causes in particular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Feyerabend, P. 1975. Against Method. Outline of an Anarchist Theory of Knowledge. Verso Edition 1978, London.

  2. 2.

    Feyerabend, P. 1982. Auszug aus dem Urteil des Distriktrichters gegen das Land Arkansas vom 5. Januar 1982, pp. 227–230. In: Feyerabend, P., and C. Thomas (Eds.), Wissenschaft und Tradition. Verlag der Fachvereine, Zürich.

  3. 3.

    Schweber, S.S., 1989. John Herschel and Charles Darwin: a study in parallel lives. Journal of the History of Biology 22:3.

  4. 4.

    Miller, H. 1849 [1850], Foot-Prints of the Creator: or, the Asterolepis of Stromness, Agassiz, L. (Ed.). Gould, Kendall and Lincoln, Boston, p. 325.

  5. 5.

    Rolfes, E. (Ed.) 1977. Die Philosophie des Theomas von Aquin. Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg, pp. 41, 43.

  6. 6.

    Hemleben, J. 1971. Kepler. Rowohlt, Reinbeck bei Hamburg, p. 93.

  7. 7.

    Hemleben, 1971, ibid., p. 93.

  8. 8.

    Hemleben, 1971, ibid., p. 53.

  9. 9.

    Cited from Secord, J.A. 2000. Victorian Sensation. The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 245.

  10. 10.

    Miller, H. 1849 [1850], Foot-Prints of the Creator: or, the Asterolepis of Stromness, Agassiz, L. (Ed.). Gould, Kendall and Lincoln, Boston, p. 337.

  11. 11.

    Darwin, Ch. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, London.

  12. 12.

    Darwin, Ch. 1888. The Descent of Man, 2nd. Ed. John Murray, London, vol. 2, p. 427.

  13. 13.

    Hume, D. 1740. A Treatise of Human Nature. Reprinted 1978, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

  14. 14.

    Moore, G.E. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

  15. 15.

    Darwin, 1888, ibid., p. 428.

  16. 16.

    Huxley, T. H. 1894. Evolution and Ethics, pp. 57–174. In: Paradis, J., and G.C. Williams (Eds.), T.H. Huxley’s Evolution and Ethics, with New Essays on its Victorian and Sociobiological Context. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

  17. 17.

    Segerstrale, U. 1986. Colleagues in conflict: an ‘in vivo’ analysis of the sociobiology controversy. Biology & Philosophy, 1: 53–87.

  18. 18.

    Wilson, E.O. 1975. Sociobiology, the New Synthesis. The Belknap Press at Harvard University Press, p. 562.

  19. 19.

    For a brief, useful and accessible introduction to evolutionary ethics, on which part of this account is based, see: http://www.iep.utm.edu/evol-eth/. See also See also Rieppel, O., 1989. Unterwegs zum Anfang. Geschichte und Konsequenzen der Evolutionstheorie. Artemis Verlag, Zürich.

  20. 20.

    Popper, K.R. 1982 (1998). The Open Universe. An Argument for Indeterminism. Routledge, London, p. 45.

  21. 21.

    Popper, K.R. 1982 (1998), ibid., p. 45.

  22. 22.

    Basilius Magnus, 1951. Homélies sur l’Hexaéméron. Texte grex, introduit et traduit par S. Giet. Edition du Cerf, Paris, p. 437.

  23. 23.

    Swammerdam, J., 1752. Bibel der Natur. Johann Friedrich Gleditschens Buchhandlung, Lepizig, p. 3.

  24. 24.

    Wilkie, J.S. 1967. Preformation and epigenesis: a new historical treatment. History of Science, 6: 138–150. See also Rieppel, 1989, ibid.

  25. 25.

    Swammerdam, 1752, ibid., p. 9.

  26. 26.

    Swammerdam, 1752, ibid., p. 313.

  27. 27.

    Buchenau, A. (Ed.), 1968. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Die Theodizee. Felix Meiner, Hamburg, p. 23.

  28. 28.

    Rieppel, O. 1988. The reception of Leibniz’ philosophy in the writings of Charles Bonnet (1720–1793). Journal of the History of Biology 21: 119–145.

  29. 29.

    Bonnet, C. 1769. La Palingénésie Philosophique, Vol. 1. C. Philibert & B. Chirol, Genf, p. 317.

  30. 30.

    Darwin, E. 1794. Zoönomia, or, the Laws of Organic Life, vol. 1. J. Johnson, London, sect. XXXIX, IV, § 8.

  31. 31.

    Darwin, E., 1794, ibid., sect. XXXIX, VII, § 8, 9.

  32. 32.

    Darwin, E., 1794, ibid., sect. XXXIX, VIII, § 1.

  33. 33.

    DeBeer, G. 1960. Darwin’s notebooks on transmutation of species, part III. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Historical, 2:148.

  34. 34.

    DeBeer, G. 1960. Darwin’s notebooks on transmutation of species, part II. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Historical, 2:106.

  35. 35.

    Miller, 1849 [1850], ibid., p. 178

  36. 36.

    Scheid, C. (Ed.), 1749. Protogaea, by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Johann Gottlieb Vierling, Leipzig, p. 39.

  37. 37.

    For details and references see Rieppel, O. 1989. Unterwegs zum Anfang; Geschichte und Konsequenzen der Evolutionstheorie. Artemis Verlag, Zürich.

  38. 38.

    Bowler, P.J. 1984. Evolution. The History of an Idea. The University of California Press, Berkley, p. 32.

  39. 39.

    Winsor, M.P. 1976. Starfish, Jellyfish, and the Order of Life. Yale University Press, New haven, p. 140.

  40. 40.

    Bowler, 1984, ibid, p. 33.

  41. 41.

    For more details see Fox, R., C.C. Gillespie, and I. Grattan-Guiness. 1978. Laplace, Pierre-Simon, Marquis de, pp. 273–403. In: Gillespie, C.C. (Ed.), Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Vol. 15, Suppl. I. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York.

  42. 42.

    Schneider. L. 1988, Isaac Newton. Beck Verlag, München, p. 158.

  43. 43.

    Hodge, M.J.S. 1972, The universal gestation of nature: Chambers’ Vestiges and Explanations. Journal of the History of Biology, 5: 132.

  44. 44.

    Secord, 2000, ibid., p. 407.

  45. 45.

    Gould, S.J., 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

  46. 46.

    Cited after Secord, 2000, ibid., p. 229.

  47. 47.

    Cited after Secord, J.A. 1994. Introduction. In: Secord, J.A. (Ed.), Robert Chambers: Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation, and Other Evolutionary Writings. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. xxxi.

  48. 48.

    Sober, E. 1988. Reconstructing the Past. Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

  49. 49.

    Gee, H. 1999. In Search of Deep Time. Beyond the Fossil Record to a New History of Life. Free Press, New York, p. 8.

  50. 50.

    Patterson, C. 1978. Evolution. British Museum (Natural History), London, p. 149.

  51. 51.

    Popper, K.R. 1974. Autobiography, pp. 1–181. In Schilpp, P.A. (Ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, vol. 1. Open Court, La Salle, IL.

  52. 52.

    Popper, K.R. 1980. Evolution. New Scientist, 21 August 190: 611.

  53. 53.

    Rudwick, M.J.S. 1972. The Meaning of Fossils. Macdonald, London, p. 226. Gillespie, 1979, ibid., p. 36.

  54. 54.

    Egerton, F.N. 1970. Refutation and conjecture: Darwin’s response to Sedgwick’s attack on Chambers. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 1: 178.

  55. 55.

    DeBeer, G. (Ed.) 1960. Darwin’s notebooks on transmutation of species, part III. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Historical, 2:141

  56. 56.

    Ospovat, D., 1981, The Development of Darwin’s Theory. Natural History, Natural Theology & Natural Selection 1838–1859. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  57. 57.

    Cited from Schweber, 1989, ibid., p. 34.

  58. 58.

    Schweber, 1989, ibid., p. 42.

  59. 59.

    Darwin, Ch, 1859. On the Origin of Species. John Murray, London, p. 84.

  60. 60.

    Nyhart, L.K. 1995. Biology Takes Form. Animal Morphology and the German Universityies, 1800 – 1900. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 109.

  61. 61.

    Secord, 2000, ibid., p. 92.

  62. 62.

    Darwin, 1859, ibid., p. 1.

  63. 63.

    Leplin, J. 1997. A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 24.

  64. 64.

    Carr, E.H. 1961. What is History. Vintage Books, New York, p. 80.

  65. 65.

    Kitcher, P. 1993 The Advancement of Science. Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. University Press, Oxford.

  66. 66.

    Evnine, S. 2001. Donald Davidson. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

  67. 67.

    Griffiths, P.E. 1999. Squaring the circle: natural kinds with historical essences, pp. 209–228. In: Wilson, R.A. (Ed.), Species. New Interdisciplinary Essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

  68. 68.

    Hull, D. 1999. The use and abuse of Sir Karl Popper. Biology & Philosophy, 14: 481–504.

  69. 69.

    Darwin, 1859, ibid., p. 490.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Rieppel .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rieppel, O. (2011). A Matter of (Natural) Laws. In: Evolutionary Theory and the Creation Controversy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14896-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics