Skip to main content

Non-verbal Persuasion and Communication in an Affective Agent

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emotion-Oriented Systems

Abstract

This chapter deals with the communication of persuasion. Only a small percentage of communication involves words: as the old saying goes, “it’s not what you say, it’s how you say it”. While this likely underestimates the importance of good verbal persuasion techniques, it is accurate in underlining the critical role of non-verbal behaviour during face-to-face communication. In this chapter we restrict the discussion to body language. We also consider embodied virtual agents. As is the case with humans, there are a number of fundamental factors to be considered when constructing persuasive agents. In particular, one who wishes to persuade must appear credible, trustworthy, confident, and non-threatening. Knowing how not to behave is also a vital basis for effective persuasion. This includes resolving task constraints or other factors with the social perception considerations. These social virtual agents face many of the same problems as humans have in controlling and expressing themselves in an appropriate manner so as to establish and maintain persuasive interaction. All along the chapter, much of our discussion will handle concepts applicable both to agent and to human behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A question looked at by Heylen and op den Akker (2007) was whether it is possible to distinguish an utterance containing “yeah” which expresses a stance (of partial agreement, i.e. an assessment in terms of the AMI annotation scheme) from an utterance that is simply meant as a backchannel. They achieved correct classification only for 60% of the cases when not taking into account the speech act of the previous utterance and 80% if they did.

  2. 2.

    We avoid the use of the term ambiguity here as the distinction between the various categories is not strict and acknowledgements can easily shift into an assessment.

References

  • Allwood J, Nivre J, Ahlsén E (1992) On the semantics and pragmatics of linguistic feedback. J Semantics 9(1):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson M (1984) Our masters’ voices. The language and body language of politics. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassili JN (1979) Emotion recognition: the role of facial movement and the relative importance of upper and lower areas of the face. J Pers Soc Psychol 37(11):2049–2058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas JB, Chovil N, Coates L, Roe L (1995) Gestures specialized for dialogue. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 21(4):394–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein LE, Demorest ME, Eberhardt SP (1994) A computational approach to analyzing sentential speech perception: phoneme-to-phoneme stimulus-response alignment. J Acoust Soc Am 95(6):3617–3622

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevacqua E, Heylen D, Pelachaud C, Tellier M (2007a, April) Facial feedback signals for ecas. In: Proceedings of AISB’07: artificial and ambient intelligence, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevacqua E, Mancini M, Niewiadomski R, Pelachaud C (2007b) An expressive eca showing complex emotions. In: Proceedings of the AISB annual convention, Newcastle, UK, pp 208–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown B, Levinson SC (1987) Politeness: some universals on language usage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucy EP, Bradley SD (2004) Presidential expressions and viewer emotion: Counterempathic responses to televised leader displays. Soc Sci Inf 43:59–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull PE (1986) The use of hand gesture in political speechers: some case studies. J Lang Soc Psychol 5:102–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon JK, Birk T, Pfau M (1990) Nonverbal behaviors, persuasion, and credibility. Hum Commun Res 17:140–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caridakis G, Raouzaiou A, Karpouzis K, Kollias S (2006, May) Synthesizing gesture expressivity based on real sequences. In: Workshop on multimodal corpora: from multimodal behaviour theories to usable models, LREC 2006 Conference, Genoa, Italy, 24–26 May 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Carli LL, LaFleur SL, Loeber CC (1995) Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence. J Pers Soc Psychol 68:1030–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi C (2000) Affective appraisal versus cognitive evaluation in social emotions and interactions. In: Paiva AM (ed) Affective interactions: towards a new generation of computer interfaces. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 76–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafai NE, Pelachaud C, Pelé D (2007) A case study of gesture expressivity breaks. Int J Lang Resour Eval, special issue on Multimodal Corpora Modell Hum Multimodal Behav 41(3–4):341–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa M, Zhao L, Badler NI (2000) The EMOTE model for effort and shape. In: Proceedings of the 27th annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques SIGGRAPH ’00, New Orleans, ACM Press, New York, NY, pp 173–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1872) The expression of the emotions in man and animals. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo BM, Kashy DA, Kirkendol SE, Wyer MM, Epstein JA (1996) Lying in everyday live. J Pers Soc Psychol 70(5):979–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deRosis F, Pelachaud C, Poggi I, Carofiglio V, De Carolis B (2003) From Greta’s mind to her face: modelling the dynamics of affective states in a conversational embodied agent. Int J Hum Comput Stud 59(1–2):81–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devillers L, Abrilian S, Martin J-C (2005) Representing real life emotions in audiovisual data with non basic emotional patterns and context features. In: First international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction (ACII’2005), Beijing, China, pp 519–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman P (1975) Unmasking the face. A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman P (1979) About brows: emotional and conversational signals, pages 169–202. Cambridge University Press/Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman P (2003) The face revealed. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman P, Friesen W, O’Sullivan M (1988) Smiles when lying. J Personal Soc Psychol 54(3):414–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey S (2000) Die Macht des Bildes. Der Einfluss der nonverbalen Kommunikation auf Kultur und Politik. Huber, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda N (1986) The emotions. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Guadagno RE, Blascovich J, Bailenson JN, McCall C (2007) Virtual humans and persuasion: the effects of agency and behavioral realism. Media Psychol 10:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann B, Mancini M, Pelachaud C (2002) Formational parameters and adaptive prototype instantiation for MPEG-4 compliant gesture synthesis. In: Computer animation’02, Geneva, Switzerland, 2002. IEEE Computer Society Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann B, Mancini M, Pelachaud C (2005) Implementing expressive gesture synthesis for embodied conversational agents. In: Gesture in human-computer interaction and simulation, 6th international gesture workshop, GW 2005, Berder Island, pp 188–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemsley GD, Doob AN (1978) The effect of looking behaviour on perceptions of a communicator’s credibility. J Appl Soc Psychol 8:136–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henley NM (1977) Body politics: power, sex, and nonverbal behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Heylen D, Bevacqua E, Tellier M, Pelachaud C (2007) Searching for prototypical facial feedback signals. In: Pelachaud C, Martin J-C, André E, Chollet G, Karpouzis K, Pelé D (eds) Proceedings of the 7th international conference on intelligent virtual agents (IVA), vol 4722 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp 147–153. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Heylen D, op den Akker R (2007) Computing backchannel distributions in multi-party conversations. In: Cassell J, Heylen D (eds) Proceedings of the ACL workshop on embodied language processing, vol W07-19, Prague, Czech Republic, 2007, pp 17–24. Association of Computational Linguistics

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggi I (2004) Emotions from mind to mind. In: Proceedings of the workshop W13: empathic agents. third international conference on autonomous agent systems, AAMAS 2004, New York, NY, USA, pp 208–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaimes A, Bourlard H, Renals S, Carletta J (2007) Recording, indexing, summarizing, and accessing meeting videos: an overview of the ami project. In: Fourth international conference on image analysis and processing (ICIAP 2007) and workshop on visual and multimedia digital libraries (VMDL 2007), Modena, pp 59–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson WL, Rizzo P, Bosma W, Kole S, Ghijsen M, van Welbergen H (2004) Generating socially appropriate tutorial dialog. In: ISCA workshop on affective dialogue systems, Modena, pp 254–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon A (1967) Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction. Acta Psychol 26:22–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendon A (2003) Some uses of head shake. Gesture 2:147–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendon A (2004) Gesture : visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester JC, Towns SG, Callaway CB, Voerman JL, FitzGerald PJ (2000) Deictic and emotive communication in animated pedagogical agents. In: Prevost S, Cassell J, Sullivan J, Churchill E (eds) Embodied conversational characters. MITpress, Cambridge, MA, pp 123–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine R (2006) The power of persuasion. chapter Whom do we trust? Experts, honesty and likability. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin J, Abrilian S, Devillers L (2005) Annotating multimodal behaviors occurring during non basic emotions. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction (ACII), Pkin, Chine

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin J-C, Abrilian S, Devillers L (2005) Annotating multimodal behaviors occurring during non basic emotions. In: 1st international conference on affective computing & intelligent interaction (ACII’2005), Beijing, China, 2005 October 22–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurice Tournier (2003) Geneviève Calbris. L’Expression gestuelle de la pense d’un homme politique. CNRS Communication

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian A (1971) Silent messages. Wadsworth Publishing Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Niewiadomski R, Pelachaud C (2007a) Fuzzy similarity of facial expressions of embodied agents. In: Pelachaud C, Martin J-C, André E, Chollet G, Karpouzis K, Pelé D (eds) Proceedings of the 7th international conference on intelligent virtual agents (IVA). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4722. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 86–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Niewiadomski R, Pelachaud C (2007b) Model of facial expressions management for an embodied conversational agent. In: Paiva A, Prada R, Picard RW (eds) Second international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction (ACII). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4738. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 12–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease B, Pease A (2006) The definitive book of body language. Bantam Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggi I (2005) The goals of persuasion. Pragmatics Cogn 13:298–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggi I, Pelachaud C (2008) Persuasion and the expressivity of gestures in humans and machines. In: Wachsmuth I, Lenzen M, Knoblich G (eds) Embodied communication in humans and machines Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 391–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggi I, Vincze L (2008) Persuasive gaze in political discourse. In: Proceedings of the AISB annual convention, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendinger H, Ishizuka M (2001) Social role awareness in animated agents. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on autonomous agents, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, pp 270–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintilianus MF (1920) Institutio Oratoria (trans: Butler HE). Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehm M, André E (2005a) Catch me if you can – exploring lying agents in social settings. In: Dignum F, Dignum V, Koenig S, Kraus S, Singh MP, Wooldridge M (eds) the proceedings of international joint conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (AAMAS), Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2005, pp 937–944. ACM

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehm M, André E (2005b) More than just a friendly phrase: multimodal aspects of polite behavior in agents. In: Nishida T (ed) Conversational informatics: an engineering approach. Wiley, Chichester, pp 69–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttkay Z, van Moppes V, Noot H (2003) The jovial, the reserved and the robot. In: Proceedings of the AAMAS03 Ws on embodied conversational characters as individuals, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiter JS, Kinzer HJ, Weger H Jr (2006, April) Background behavior in live debates: the effects of the implicit ad hominem fallacy. Commun Rep 19(1):57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serenari M (2003) Examples from the Berlin dictionary of everyday gestures. In: Rector M, Poggi I, Trigo N (eds) Gestures. Meaning and use. Edicoes Universidade Fernando Pessoa

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck J (2008) A case study of the democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Res Lang Soc Interact 41:154–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Trees AR, Manusov V (1998) Managing face concerns in criticism. Hum Commun Res 24(4):564–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R (1984) Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Walter de Gruyter and Foris, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker MA, Cahn JE, Whittaker SJ (1997) Improvising linguistic style: Social and affective bases for agent personality. In: First international conference on autonomous agents, Marina del Rey, CA, USA, pp 96–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Yngve VH (1970) On getting a word in edgewise. In: Papers from the sixth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago; pp 567–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson K, Mattews B, Allman J (2007) Brain activation during sight gags and language-dependent humor. Cerebral Cortex 17(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuill N (1997) A funny thing happened on the way on the classroom: jokes, riddles and metalinguistic awareness in understanding and improving poor comprehension in children. In: Disabilities: processes and intervention. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth André .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

André, E. et al. (2011). Non-verbal Persuasion and Communication in an Affective Agent. In: Cowie, R., Pelachaud, C., Petta, P. (eds) Emotion-Oriented Systems. Cognitive Technologies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15184-2_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15184-2_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15183-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15184-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics