Abstract
This paper presents a post-hoc analysis on how the Wikipedia collections fared in providing answers and justifications to GikiCLEF topics. Based on all solutions found by all GikiCLEF participant systems, this paper measures how self-sufficient the particular Wikipedia collections were to provide answers and justifications for the topics, in order to better understand the recall limit that a GikiCLEF system specialised in one single language has.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Santos, D., Cabral, L.M.: GikiCLEF: Expectations and lessons learned. In: Peters, C., et al. (eds.) CLEF 2009 Workshop, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6241, pp. 212–222. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Cardoso, N., Baptista, D., Lopez-Pellicer, F.J., Silva, M.J.: Where in the Wikipedia is that answer? the XLDB at the GikiCLEF 2009 task. In: Peters, C., et al. (eds.) CLEF 2009 Workshop, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6241, pp. 305–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R., Ives, Z.: DBpedia: A Nucleus for a Web of Open Data. In: Aberer, K., et al. (eds.) ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 722–735. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cardoso, N. (2010). GikiCLEF Topics and Wikipedia Articles: Did They Blend?. In: Peters, C., et al. Multilingual Information Access Evaluation I. Text Retrieval Experiments. CLEF 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6241. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15754-7_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15754-7_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15753-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15754-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)