Skip to main content

Evaluation of a Difference of Gaussians Based Image Difference Metric in Relation to Perceived Compression Artifacts

  • Conference paper
Advances in Visual Computing (ISVC 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 6454))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we investigate if the Difference of Gaussians model is able to predict observers perceived difference in relation to compression artifacts. A new image difference metric for specifically designed for compression artifacts is proposed. In order to evaluate this new metric a psychophysical experiment is carried out, where a dataset of 80 compressed JPEG and JPEG2000 images were generated from 10 different scenes. The results of the psychophysical experiment with 18 observers and the quality scores obtained from a large number of image difference metrics are presented.

Furthermore, a quantitative study based on a number of image difference metrics and five additional databases is performed in order to reveal the potential of the proposed metric. The analyses show that the proposed metric and most of the tested ones do not correlate well with the subjective test results, and thus the increased complexity of the recent metrics is not justified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pedersen, M., Hardeberg, J.Y.: Survey of full-reference image quality metrics. Høgskolen i Gjøviks rapportserie, vol. 5. Gjøvik University College, The Norwegian Color Research Laboratory, Gjøvik, Norway (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Luo, M., Cui, G., Rigg, B.: The development of the CIE 2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000. Color Research and Application 26, 340–350 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, X.M., Farrell, J., Wandell, B.: Application of a spatial extension to cielab. In: IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging 1997, vol. 3025, pp. 154–157 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson, G.M.: Measuring images: differences, quality and apperance. PhD thesis, Rochester Institute of Technology (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson, G.M., Fairchild, M.D.: Darwinism of color image difference models. In: IS&T/SID 9th Color Imaging Conference, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, pp. 108–112 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hong, G., Luo, M.R.: New algorithm for calculating perceived colour difference of images. Imaging Science Journal 54, 86–91 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oleari, C., Melgosa, M., Huertas, R.: Euclidean color-difference formula for small-medium color differences in log-compressed osa-ucs space. Journal of the Optical Society of America 26, 121–134 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huertas, R., Melgosa, M., Oleari, C.: Performance of a color-difference formula based on OSA-UCS space using small-medium color differences. Journal of the Optical Society of America 23, 2077–2084 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Simone, G., Oleari, C., Farup, I.: Performance of the euclidean color-difference formula in log-compressed OSA-UCS space applied to modified image-difference metrics. In: 11th Congress of the International Colour Association (AIC), Sydney, Australia, p. 81 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ajagamelle, S.: Analysis of the difference of gaussians model in perceptual image difference metrics. Master’s thesis, Gjøvik University College and Grenoble Institute of Technology (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ajagamelle, S.A., Pedersen, M., Simone, G.: Analysis of the difference of gaussians model in image difference metrics. In: 5th European Conference on Colour in Graphics, Imaging, and Vision (CGIV), Joensuu, Finland, pp. 489–496 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.: A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 9, 81–84 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE TIP 13, 600–612 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pedersen, M., Bonnier, N., Hardeberg, J.Y., Albregtsen, F.: Attributes of image quality for color prints. Journal of Electronic Imaging 19, 011016-1– 011016-13 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tadmor, Y., Tolhurst, D.: Calculating the contrasts that retinal ganglion cells and LGN neurones encounter in natural scenes. Vision Research 40, 3145–3157 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Simone, G., Pedersen, M., Hardeberg, J.Y.: Measuring perceptual contrast in digital images. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation (2010) (under review)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Field, G.G.: Test image design guidelines for color quality evaluation. In: IS&T/SID 7th Color Imaging Conference, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, pp. 194–196 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. CIE: Guidelines for the evaluation of gamut mapping algorithms. Technical Report, CIE TC8-08 (156:2004) ISBN: 3-901-906-26-6

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ponomarenko, N., Lukin, V., Egiazarian, K., Astola, J., Carli, M., Battisti, F.: Color image database for evaluation of image quality metrics, pp. 403–408 (2008), http://www.ponomarenko.info/tid2008.htm

  20. ISO: Graphic techonology - prepress digital echange. Technical report, ISO 12640-2, 1 edn. (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reinhard, E., Ward, G., Pattanaik, S., Debevec, P.: High Dynamic Range Imaging - Acquisition, Display and Image-Based Lighting. Morgan Kaufmann Publisher, San Francisco (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Le Callet, P.A.: Subjective quality assessment irccyn/ivc database 2005. In: IRCCyN (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Engeldrum, P.G.: Psychometric Scaling. Imcotek Press, Winchester (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Djik, J.: In search of an objective measure for the perceptual quality of printed images. PhD thesis, Technische Unisersitet Delft (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Caracciolo, V.: Just noticeable distortion evaluation in color images. Master’s thesis, Gjøvik University College and Roma Tre University (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Eskicioglu, A., Fisher, P., Chen, S.: Image quality measures and their performance. IEEE Transactions on Communications 43, 2959–2965 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pedersen, M.: Importance of region-of-interest on image difference metrics. Master thesis, Gjøvik University College (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dugay, F., Farup, I., Hardeberg, J.Y.: Perceptual evaluation of color gamut mapping algorithms. Color Research & Application 33, 470–476 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Simone, G., Caracciolo, V., Pedersen, M., Cheikh, F.A. (2010). Evaluation of a Difference of Gaussians Based Image Difference Metric in Relation to Perceived Compression Artifacts. In: Bebis, G., et al. Advances in Visual Computing. ISVC 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6454. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17274-8_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17274-8_48

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17273-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17274-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics