Skip to main content

Abstract

Since the introduction of the first combined PET/CT scanner in 1998, diffusion of this technology into the clinical arena has been rapid, more reminiscent of the adoption of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the early eighties than the slower acceptance of positron emission tomography (PET). For almost two decades, PET was viewed primarily as a research tool until Medicare approval, in 1998, of PET imaging for the diagnosis and staging of a number of different cancers. With this approval, the role of PET in oncology increased significantly from 1999 onwards. Coinciding with the growth in PET, the first commercial PET/CT scanners appeared in the clinic in early 2001, further advancing the adoption of PET in oncology by bringing functional imaging with radioactive tracers directly to the radiological community. As the benefits of imaging anatomy and function in the same scanner has become more widely appreciated, the demand for the technology has increased to a point where, in less than three years, over 300 such units are now installed in medical institutions worldwide. The trend from PET to PET/CT is confirmed by vendors whose PET/CT sales now represent up to 80% of the PET market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T, Kinahan PE, Charron M, Roddy R, Jerin J, Young J, Byars L, Nutt R. A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med. 2000;41(8):1369–1379.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Charron M, Beyer T, Bohnen NN, Kinahan PE, Dachille MA, Jerin J, Nutt R, Meltzer CC, Villemagne V, Townsend DW. Image analysis in patients with cancer studied with a combined PET and CT scanner. Clin Nucl Med. 2000;25(11): 905–910.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kluetz PG, Meltzer CC, Villemagne VL, Kinahan PE, Chander S, Martinelli MA, Townsend DW. Combined PET/CT imaging in oncology: impact on patient management. Clin Positron Imaging. 2001;3(6):223–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Meltzer CC, Martinelli MA, Beyer T, Kinahan PE, Charron M, McCook B, Townsend DW. Whole-body FDG PET imaging in the abdomen: value of combined PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(5 Suppl):35P.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meltzer CC, Snyderman CH, Fukui MB, Bascom DA, Chander S, Johnson JT, Myers EN, Martinelli MA, Kinahan PE, Townsend DW. Combined FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: impact on patient management. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(5 Suppl):36P.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Townsend DW, Beyer T, Blodgett TM. PET/CT scanners: a hardware approach to image fusion. Semin Nucl Med. 2003;33(3): 193–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho ZH, Farukhi MR. Bismuth germanate as a potential scintillation detector in positron cameras. J Nucl Med. 1977;18(8):840–844.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Takagi K, Fukazawa T. Cerium-activated Gd2SiO5 single crystal scintillator. App Phys Lett. 1983;42(1):43–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Melcher CL, Schweitzer JS. Cerium-doped lutetium oxyorthosilicate: a fast, efficient new scintillator. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1992;39(4):502–505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Strother SC, Casey ME, Hoffman EJ. Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalent counts. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1990;37(2):783–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kinahan PE, Townsend DW, Beyer T, Sashin D. Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. Med Phys. 1998;25(10):2046–2053.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Burger C, Goerres G, Schoenes S, Buck A, Lonn AH, von Schultess GK. PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29(7):922–927.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Beyer T, Antoch G, Blodgett T, Freudenberg L, Akhurst T, Mueller S. Dual-modality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30(4): 588–596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Osman MM, Cohade C, Nakamoto Y, Marshall LT, Leal JP, Wahl RL. J. Clinically significant inaccurate localization of lesions with PET/CT: frequency in 300 patients. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(2):240–243.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yau YY., Coel M, Chan WS, Tarn YM, Wong S. Application of IV contrast in PET-CT: does it really produce attenuation correction error? J Nucl Med. 2003;44(5 Suppl):272P.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carney JP, Beyer T, Brasse D, Yap JT, Townsend DW. Clinical PET/CT scanning using oral CT contrast agents. J Nucl Med. 2002;43(5 Suppl):57P.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cohade C, Osman M, Marshall L, Wahl RL. Metallic object artifacts on PET-CT: clinical and phantom studies. J Nucl Med. 2002;43(5 Suppl):308P.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Halpern B, Dahlbom M, Vranjesevic D, Ratib O, Schiepers C, Silverman DH, Waldherr C, Quon A, Czernin J. LSO-PET/CT whole body imaging in 7 minutes: is it feasible? J Nucl Med. 2003;44(5 Suppl):380P–381P.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nutt RE, Nutt R. Combined PET and CT detector and method for using same. US Patent No. 6, 449, 331. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nahmias C, Nutt R, Hichwa RD, Czernin J, Melcher C, Schmand M, Andreaco M, Eriksson L, Casey M, Moyers C, Michel C, Bruckbauer T, Conti M, Bendriem B, Hamill J. PET tomograph designed for five minute routine whole body studies. J Nucl Med. 2002;43(5 Suppl):11P.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Casey ME, Nutt R. A multicrystal, two dimensional BGO detector system for positron emission tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1986;33(1):460–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Townsend, D. (2004). A Future for PET/CT. In: Atlas of PET/CT Imaging in Oncology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18517-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18517-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62141-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18517-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics