Skip to main content

Comparison of Fuzzy and Neural Network Models to Diagnose Breast Cancer

  • Conference paper
Control, Computation and Information Systems (ICLICC 2011)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 140))

  • 1137 Accesses

Abstract

The automatic diagnosis of breast cancer is an important, real-world medical problem. A major class of problems in Medical Science involves the diagnosis of disease, based upon various tests performed upon the patient. When several tests are involved, the ultimate diagnosis may be difficult to obtain, even for a medical expert. This has given rise, over the past few decades, to computerized diagnostic tools, intended to aid the Physician in making sense out of the confusion of data. This Paper carried out to generate and evaluate both fuzzy and neural network models to predict malignancy of breast tumor, using Wisconsin Diagnosis Breast Cancer Database (WDBC). Our objectives in this Paper are: (i) to compare the diagnostic performance of fuzzy and neural network models in distinction between malignance and benign patterns, (ii) to reduce the number of benign cases sent for biopsy using the best model as a supportive tool, and (iii) to validate the capability of each model to recognize new cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barras, J.S., Vigna, L.: Convergence of Kohonen’s Learning Vector Quantization. In: International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, San Diego, CA, vol. 3, pp. 17–20 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bezdek, J.: Cluster validity with fuzzy sets. J. Cybern. (3), 58–71 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bezdek, J.C.: A Convergence Theorem for the Fuzzy ISODATA Clustering Algorithms. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. PAM 1-2(1), 1–8 (1980)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bezdek, J.C., Ehrlich, R., Full, W.: FCM: the fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Computer & Geosciences 10, 191–203 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fletcher, S.W., Black, W., Harrier, R., Rimer, B.K., Shapiro, S.: Report of the International workshop on screening for breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 85, 1644–1656 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giard, R.W.M., Hermann, J.: The value of aspiration cytologic examination of the breast: A statistical review of the medical literature. Cancer 69, 2104–2110 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. ICMR, National Cancer Registry Programme, Consolidated report of the population based cancer registries,1997 Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. ICMR, National Cancer Registry Programme, 1981-2001, An Overview. Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kent, J.T., Mardia, K.V.: Spatial Classification Using Fuzzy Memberships Models. IEEE Trans. on PAMI 10(5), 659–671 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kohonen, T.: Learning Vector Quantization for Pattern Recognition. Technical Report TKK-F-A601, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kohonen, T.: Improved Version of Learning Vector Quantization. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, San Diego, CA, vol. 1, pp. 545–550 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kolen, J.F., Hutcheson, T.: Reducing the time complexity of the fuzzy c-means algorithm. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 10(2), 263–267 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Marshall, E.: Search for a Killer: Focus shifts from fret to hormones in special report on breast cancer. Science 259, 618–621 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McBratney, A.B., de Gruijter, J.J.: A Continuoum Approach to Soil Classification by Modified Fuzzy k-Means with Extra-grades. Journal of Soil Sciences 43, 159–175 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McCulloch, W.S., Pitts, W.: A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. of mathematical Biophysics 5, 115–133 (1943)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control, vol. 8, pp. 338–353 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abdul Hameed, W., Bagavandas, M. (2011). Comparison of Fuzzy and Neural Network Models to Diagnose Breast Cancer. In: Balasubramaniam, P. (eds) Control, Computation and Information Systems. ICLICC 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 140. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19263-0_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19263-0_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19262-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19263-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics