Skip to main content

Five Agile Factors: Helping Self-management to Self-reflect

  • Conference paper
Systems, Software and Service Process Improvement (EuroSPI 2011)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 172))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper a tool is proposed to foster reflection in agile software development teams. Based upon the qualitative model of Moe et al. [11], we contribute a quantitative questionnaire organized along five dimensions of agile teamwork analogous to the “Five Factor Model” in contemporary psychology. To test this survey tool and its alignment with existing studies, we have executed an empirical validation of the tool with 79 individuals and 8 international Scrum teams. We find that inter-team agreement on the factors is high and that the survey tool is found very useful. The instrument offers a comparable measure to agile teams and gives recommendations for each of the factors helping to understand individual as well as organizational level barriers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, T.J.: Communication networks in R & D laboratories. R & D Management 1(1), 14–21 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boehm, B., Turner, R.: Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Digman, J.: Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology 41, 417–440 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dybå, T., Dingsøyr, T.: Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50, 833–859 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Emery, F., Thorsrud, E.: Democracy at Work - The Report of the Norwegian Industrial Democracy Program. Springer, Heidelberg (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fægri, T.E., Dybå, T., Dingsøyr, T.: Introducing knowledge redundancy practice in software development: Experiences with job rotation in support work. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52, 1118–1132 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guzzo, R.A., Dickson, M.W.: Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology 47(1), 307–338 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hewitt, B., Walz, D.: Using shared leadership to foster knowledge sharing in information systems development projects. In: HICSS 8, p. 256a (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karau, S., Williams, K.: Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65(4), 681–706 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moe, N., Dingsøyr, T., Dybå, T.: Overcoming barriers to self-management in software teams. IEEE Software 26, 20–26 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moe, N., Dingsøyr, T., Røyrvik, E.: Putting agile teamwork to the test – an preliminary instrument for empirically assessing and improving agile software development. In: Abrahamsson, P., Marchesi, M., Maurer, F. (eds.) Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming. LNBIP, vol. 31, pp. 114–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Moe, N.B., Dingsøyr, T.: Scrum and Team Effectiveness: Theory and Practice. In: Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming pp. 11–20 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moe, N.B., Dingsøyr, T., Dybå, T.: A teamwork model for understanding an agile team: A case study of a scrum project. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52, 480–491 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Morgan, G.: Images of Organization. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paulhus, D.L.: Socially desirable responding: the evolution of a construct. In: The Role of Constructs in Psychological and Educational Measurement, pp. 46–69. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pearce, C.L.: The Future of Leadership: Combining Vertical and Shared Leadership to Transform Knowledge Work. Academy of Management Executive 18(1), 47–57 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Salas, E., Sims, D., Burke, C.: Is there a big five in teamwork? Small Group Research 36(5), 555–599 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shea, G., Guzzo, R.: Group effectiveness: What really matters? Sloan Management Review 28, 25–31 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Takeuchi, H., Nonaka, I.: The new new product development game. Harvard Business Review (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tata, J., Prasad, S.: Team Self-Management, Organizational Structure and Judgments of Team Effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Issues 16(2), 248+ (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thompson, E.R., Phua, F.T.T.: Reliability among senior managers of the marlowe-crowne short-form social desirability scale. Journal of Business and Psychology 19(4), 541–554 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thompson, L.: Making the Team. ch. 2, ch. 4. Prentice-Hall, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Walton, R.E., Hackman, J.R.: Designing Effective Work Groups. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco (1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stettina, C.J., Heijstek, W. (2011). Five Agile Factors: Helping Self-management to Self-reflect. In: O‘Connor, R.V., Pries-Heje, J., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Service Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 172. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22206-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22206-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22205-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22206-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics