Skip to main content

Institutional Investors and Management Incentives: the Empirical Evidence from Chinese A-Share

  • Conference paper
Advances in Applied Economics, Business and Development (ISAEBD 2011)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 209))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3097 Accesses

Abstract

According to the date from the listed companies on China’s A stock market for the period 2006-2009, we examined wether there was a relationship between institutional investors and executive incentives of listed companies. Our empirical study found that in China, institutional ownership concentration was positively related to the level of executive compensation and negatively related to executive shareholdings proportion. These results suggest that the institutional investors do not serve a monitoring role in mitigating the agency problem between shareholders and managers; they do not restrict the level of executive compensation, and just depress executive shareholding proportion to some degree. Institutional investors do not improve the merchanism of executive incentives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Tang, Z., Gu, C.: Institutional investors participating in corporate governance: theoretical analysis, experience summaried and strategy suggestions. Jianghuai Forum 03, 37–42 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xie, Z.: Historic turning point in internal corporate governance - the involvement of institutional investors. Contemporary Manager 12, 87 (2003) (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhong, J.: The rise of active investors - why and how U.S. institutional investors participating in corporate governance and its implications for China. International Economic Review (9-10), 41–45 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li, W., Li, B.: The empirical study of institutional investors involved in corporate governance - Based on the experience study of CCGINK. Nankai Business Review 11(1), 4–14 (2008) (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gillan, S.L., Starks, L.T.: Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: the role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics 57, 275–305 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guercio, D.D., Seery, L., Woidtke, T.: Do boards pay attention when institutional investor activists “just vote no? Journal of Financial Economics 90, 84–103 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Florou, A., Pope, P.: Are boards and institutional investors active monitors? Evidence from CEO dismissal. Managerial Auditing Journal 23(9), 862–872 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wahal, S., McConnell, J.J.: Do institutional investors exacerbate managerial myopia? Journal of Corporate Finance 6, 307–329 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hartzell, J.C., Starks, L.T.: Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation. Working Paper, University of Texas at Austin (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cornett, M.M., Alan, J.: Marcus, Anthony Saunders, Hassan Tehranian. The Impact of Institutional Ownership on Corporate Operating Performance. Working Paper, NYU Stern Department of Finance (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Niclas, H.: Can we expect institutional investors to improve corporate governance? Scandinavian Journal of Management 21, 293–327 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Robert, W., Beck, M., McKinnon, R.: Problems and Limitations of Institutional Investor Participation in Corporate Governance. Journal of Corporate Governance 11(1), 65–73 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bainbridge, S.M.: Shareholder Activism and Institutional Investors. Research Paper No. 05-20, UCLA School of Law

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H.: Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–360 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Levitz, J.: Do Mutual Fund Managers Back CEO Pay? —Study Finds Firms Failed to Use Voting Power in Favor of Linking Compensation to Performance. The Wall Street Journal 28, C.1(2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ferreira, M.A., Matos, P.: The colors of investors’ money: The role of institutional investors around the world. Journal of Financial Economics 88, 499–533 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chang, B. (2011). Institutional Investors and Management Incentives: the Empirical Evidence from Chinese A-Share. In: Zhou, Q. (eds) Advances in Applied Economics, Business and Development. ISAEBD 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 209. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23020-2_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23020-2_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23019-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23020-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics