Skip to main content

How Philosophy, Science and Technologies Studies, and Feminist Studies of Technology Can Be of Use for Soft Computing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Soft Computing in Humanities and Social Sciences

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 273))

  • 913 Accesses

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence has been one of the fields within Computer Science that has generated more interest and debates among philosophers. Later on, the most recent fields of Science and Technology Studies (STS), and Feminist Studies of Technology (FST) have also shown some interest in AI. In both cases most of the authors have been quite critical about the promises, practices and, particularly, the epistemological basis of Classical AI. The first part of the paper consists on an enumeration of the most important authors and their critiques to AI from Philosophy, STS studies and FST. Since Soft Computing entails important changes with respect to traditional AI approaches, the second part of the paper will be devoted to confront Soft Computing with the previous critiques and challenges to AI and to weight up to what extent Soft Computing could (or could not) answer differently than other AI approaches to these critiques and challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adam, A.: Artificial Knowing. Gender and the Thinking Machine. Routledge, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agre, P.: Computation and Human Experience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Alcoff, L., Potter, E. (eds.): Feminist Epistemologies. Routledge, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bloor, D.: Knowledge and Social Imagery. Routledge, London (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brooks, R.A.: Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 47, 139–159 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Code, L.: What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Cornel Univ. Press, Ithaca (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Code, L.: Taking Subjectivity into Account. In: Alcoff, L., Potter, E. (ed.) Feminist Epistemologies, pp. 15–48

    Google Scholar 

  8. Collins, H.M. (ed.): Artificial Experts: Social Knowledge and Intelligent Machines. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dennett, D.: The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dreyfus, H.L.: What Computers Can’t Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence. Harper and Row, New York (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dreyfus, H.L.: What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Forsythe, D.: Engineering Knowledge: The Construction of Knowledge in Artificial Intelligence. Social Studies of Science 23(3), 445–477 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guadarrama, S.: Computing with Actions: The case of driving a car in a simulated car race. In: International Fuzzy Systems Association-European Society for Fuzzy Logic and technologies (IFSA-EUSFLAT) World Congress, pp. 1410–1415 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Haraway, D.: Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harding, S.: Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Keller, E.F.: Reflections on Gender and Science. Yale University Press, New Haven (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Latour, B., Woolgar, S.: Laboratory Life. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lenat, D.B., Guha, R.V.: Building Large Knowledge-Bused Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project. Addison Wesley, Reading (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Penrose, R.: The Emperor’s New Mind. OUP, Oxford (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Searle, J.: Minds, brains and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 417–457 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Suchman, L.: Plans and Situated Action: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Suchman, L.: Located Accountabilities in Technology Production and Use. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14(9), 1–105 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Suchman, L.: Human-Machine Reconfigurations. Plans and Situated Action, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Trillas, E.: La Inteligencia artificial. Máquinas y personas. Madrid, Ed, Debate (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Trillas, E., Moraga, C., Guadarrama, S.: A (naïve) glance at Soft Computing. International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Systems (in Press, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Turing, A.: Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind 59, 433–460 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophical Investigations (PI). In: Anscombe, G.E.M., Rhees, R. (eds.). Blackwell, Oxford (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yamakawa, T.: Stabilization of an inverted pendulum by a high-speed fuzzy logic controller hardware system. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 32, 161–180 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy Logic = Computing with Words. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems 4(2), 103–111 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Zadeh, L.A.: Commonsense Knowledge Representation based on Fuzzy Logic. IEEE, 61–65 (October 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zadeh, L.A.: A computational theory of dispositions. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 312–318 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zadeh, L.A.: Soft computing and fuzzy logic. IEEE Software 11(6), 48–56 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zadeh, L.A.: Toward Human Level Machine Intelligence- Is It Achievable? The Need for a Paradigm Shift. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 11–22 (August 2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sanz, V. (2012). How Philosophy, Science and Technologies Studies, and Feminist Studies of Technology Can Be of Use for Soft Computing. In: Seising, R., Sanz González, V. (eds) Soft Computing in Humanities and Social Sciences. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 273. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24672-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24672-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24671-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24672-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics