Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Information Systems in Environmental Sustainability: Of Cannibals and Forks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Green Business Process Management

Abstract

That individuals, communities, and organizations need to change patterns of behavior and interactions to create a sustainable future for the biosphere has become a widely accepted concept in both organizational practice and sustainability research from multiple disciplinary perspectives. Information systems and the organizational, community and individual actions they support have the potential to alter the current trajectory of resource consumption, negative environmental impacts, and ecosystem degradation. Although the Information Systems discipline has begun to address the problem of environmental sustainability, current models adhere to a technologic-managerial mindset which supports the organizational status quo. By critiquing the assumptions of the established Triple Bottom Line framework, this research proposes that Information Systems research can be expanded in three directions: addressing collective rather than individual actions, creating, measuring and monitoring a broad range of environmental impact measures, and designing organizational learning systems that enable adaptive management practices in the face of unpredictable and nonlinear environmental changes. Recognition of these additional research avenues will emphasize the difficulty of the problem domain and support transformational research thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Ecosystem services are the conditions and processes through which natural ecosystems, and the species that make them up, sustain and fulfill human life” (Daily, 1997, p. 3).

References

  • Armstrong, D., Castro, I., & Griffiths, R. (2007). Using adaptive management to determine requirements of re-introduced populations: The case of the New Zealand hihi. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 953–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, A. A. (1994). Reflections on sustainability, population growth, and the environment. Population and Environment, 16(1), 5–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future: World commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butchart, S. H. M., Walpole, M., Collen, B., Van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J. P. W., Almond, R. E. A., & Watson, R. (2010). Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines. Science, 328, 1164–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, G. (1997). Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSimone, L. D., & Popoff, F. (1997). Eco-efficiency: The business link to sustainable development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiSalvo, C., Sengers, P., & Brynjarsdottir, H. (2010). Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. Paper presented at the CHI, Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P. (2010). HCI and environmental sustainability: The politics of design and the design of politics. Paper presented at the DIS 2010, Aarhus, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, C., & Starik, M. (2004). The primordial stakeholder: Advancing the consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, S. (2011). Transdisciplinary perspective on environmental sustainability: A resource base and framework of IT-enabled business transformation. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 197–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, E. C., & Ramankutty, N. (2008). Putting people in the map: Anthropogenic biomes of the world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6(8), 439–447. 6(8), 439–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figge, F., & Hahn, T. (2004). Sustainable value added. Measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency. Ecological Economics, 48(2), 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, K. (2006). Business ethics: People, profits, and the planet. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman, S. R. (1990). Agroecology: Researching the ecological basis for sustainable agriculture. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, K. A., Pellow, D. N., & Schnaiberg, A. (2004). Interrogating the treadmill of production: Everything you wanted to know about the treadmill but were afraid to ask. Organization & Environment, 17, 296–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. H., & Bebbington, K. J. (2000). Environmental accounting, managerialism and sustainability: Is the planet safe in the hands of business and accounting? Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 1(1), 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., & Milne, M. J. (2002). Sustainability reporting: Who’s kidding whom? Chartered Accountants Journal of New Zealand, 81(6), 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, N., Shogren, J., & White, B. (2007). Environmental economics in theory and practice. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannigan, J. (2006). Environmental sociology: A social constructionist perspective. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L. (1997). Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75, 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in IS research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondoh, K. (2009). The challenge of climate change and energy policies for building a sustainable society in Japan. Organization & Environment, 22(1), 52–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Second thoughts on paradigms. In The essential tension (pp. 293–319). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, A., Melville, N., & Watson, R. (2011). CfP information systems and environmental sustainability. MIS Quarterly, Special Issue Call for Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle. New York: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. (1998). Indicators and information systems for sustainable development. Hartland: Sustainability Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville, N. P. (2010). Information systems innovation for environmental sustainability. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, M. J., Ball, A., & Gray, R. (2008). Wither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and the institutionalization of corporate sustainability reporting. American Accounting Association Annual Meeting, Anaheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A., & Janicke, M. (2009). The origins and theoretical foundations of ecological modernisation theory. In A. Mol, D. Sonnenfled, & G. Spaargaren (Eds.), The ecological modernisation reader: Environmental reform in theory and practice (pp. 1–27). London: Routledge, London, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. (2005). Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. (1993). Blueprint 3: Measuring sustainable development. London: Earthscan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G., Allen, C. R., & Holling, C. S. (1998). Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems, 1, 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumpff, L., Duncan, D. H., Vesk, P. A., Keith, D. A., & Wintle, B. A. (2011). State-and-transition modelling for adaptive management of native woodlands. Biological Conservation, 144, 1224–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salafsky, N., Margoluis, R., Redford, K. H., & Robinson, J. G. (2001). Improving the practice of conservation: A conceptual framework and research agenda for conservation science. Conservation Biology, 16(6), 1469–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savitz, A., & Weber, K. (2006). The triple bottom line: How today’s best run companies are achieving economic, social, and environmental success. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Crown Business, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P., Smith, B., Schley, S., Laur, J., & Kruschwitz, N. (2008). The necessary revolution: How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suggett, D., & Goodsir, B. (2002). Triple bottom line measurement and reporting in Australia: Making it tangible. Melbourne: Allen Consulting Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2011). World population to reach 10 billion by 2100 if fertility in all countries converges to replacement level, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay, F. 2004 “Impact assessment and the Triple Bottom Line: Competing pathways to sustainability?”, in Cheney, H., Katz, E. & Solomon, F. (eds) Sustainability and Social Science Round Table Proceedings (conference held Dec 2003), Sydney: The Institute for Sustainable Futures (University of Technology, Sydney) together with CSIRO Minerals, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J., & Melillo, J. (1997). Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277(5325), 494–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies, J., Abel, N., Cumming, G., Janssen, M., et al. (2002). Resilience management in social-ecological systems: A working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology, 6(1). Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol6/iss1/art14/

  • Watson, R. T., Boudreau, M., & Chen, A. (2010). Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: Energy informatics and new directions for the IS community. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1994). Biodiversity: Challenge, science, opportunity. American Zoologist, 34, 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winsor, D. (2001). Corporate citizenship: Evolution and interpretation. In J. Androif & M. McIntosh (Eds.), Perspectives on corporate citizenship. Greenleaf: Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodgate, G., & Redclift, M. (1998). From a ‘sociology of nature’ to environmental sociology: Beyond social construction. Environmental Values, 7, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). Footprints on the earth: The environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 279–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Information Systems, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia

    Dirk S. Hovorka (Associate Professor)

  2. Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia

    Elaine Labajo (Aspiring Sustainability Consultant)

  3. School of Sustainable Development, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia

    Nancy Auerbach (Assistant Professor)

Authors
  1. Dirk S. Hovorka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elaine Labajo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nancy Auerbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk S. Hovorka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst. of Information Systems, University of Liechtenstein, Fürst-Franz-Josef-Str. 21, Vaduz, 9490, Liechtenstein

    Jan vom Brocke

  2. Inst. of Information Systems, University of Liechtenstein, Fürst-Franz-Josef-Strasse 21, Vaduz, 9490, Liechtenstein

    Stefan Seidel

  3. , School of Information Systems, Queensland University of Technology, Margaret Street 126, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Queensland, Australia

    Jan Recker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hovorka, D.S., Labajo, E., Auerbach, N. (2012). Information Systems in Environmental Sustainability: Of Cannibals and Forks. In: vom Brocke, J., Seidel, S., Recker, J. (eds) Green Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27488-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation