Skip to main content

Modelling Empathy in Social Robotic Companions

  • Conference paper
Advances in User Modeling (UMAP 2011)

Abstract

Empathy can be broadly defined as the ability to understand and respond appropriately to the affective states of others. In this paper, we present a scenario where a social robot acts as a chess companion for children, and describe our current efforts towards endowing such robot with empathic capabilities. A multimodal framework for modeling some of the user’s affective states that combines visual and task-related features is presented. Using this model of the user, we personalise the learning environment by adapting the robot’s empathic responses to the particular preferences of the child who is interacting with the robot. We also describe a preliminary study conducted in this scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aghaei Pour, P., Hussain, M.S., AlZoubi, O., D’Mello, S., Calvo, R.A.: The Impact of System Feedback on Learners’ Affective and Physiological States. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6094, pp. 264–273. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, C., Keltner, D.: The role of empathy in the formation and maintenance of social bonds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25(01), 21–22 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arroyo, I., Ferguson, K., Johns, J., Dragon, T., Meheranian, H., Fisher, D., Barto, A., Mahadevan, S., Woolf, B.P.: Repairing disengagement with non-invasive interventions. In: Proc. of AIED 2007, pp. 195–202. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Auer, P., Cesa-Bianchi, N., Fischer, P.: Finite-time analysis of the multiarmed bandit problem. Machine Learning 47(2), 235–256 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Batson, C.D., Early, S., Salvarani, G.: Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23(7), 751 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bickmore, T., Schulman, D., Yin, L.: Maintaining engagement in long-term interventions with relational agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence 24(6), 648–666 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Castellano, G., Leite, I., Pereira, A., Martinho, C., Paiva, A., McOwan, P.W.: It’s all in the game: Towards an affect sensitive and context aware game companion. In: Proceedings of ACII 2009, pp. 29–36. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Castellano, G., Leite, I., Pereira, A., Martinho, C., Paiva, A., McOwan, P.W.: Affect recognition for interactive companions: Challenges and design in real-world scenarios. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 3(1-2), 89–98 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Castellano, G., Pereira, A., Leite, I., Paiva, A., McOwan, P.W.: Detecting user engagement with a robot companion using task and social interaction-based features. In: Proceedings of ICMI 2009, pp. 119–126. ACM Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Conati, C., Maclaren, H.: Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 19(3), 267–303 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper, B., Brna, P., Martins, A.: Effective Affective in Intelligent Systems: Building on Evidence of Empathy in Teaching and Learning. In: Paiva, A.M. (ed.) IWAI 1999. LNCS, vol. 1814, pp. 21–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Craig, S., Graesser, A., Sullins, J., Gholson, B.: Affect and learning: an exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. Learning, Media and Technology 29(3), 241–250 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper Perennial, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Deutsch, F., Madle, R.A.: Empathy: Historic and current conceptualizations, measurement, and a cognitive theoretical perspective. Human Development 18(4), 267–287 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D’Mello, S., Craig, S., Fike, K., Graesser, A.: Responding to learners’ cognitive-affective states with supportive and shakeup dialogues. In: Human-Computer Interaction. Ambient, Ubiquitous and Intelligent Interaction, pp, 595–604 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. D’Mello, S., Picard, R.W., Graesser, A.: Toward an affect-sensitive autotutor. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 53–61 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Domagk, S.: Do pedagogical agents facilitate learner motivation and learning outcomes?: The role of the appeal of agent’s appearance and voice. Journal of Media Psychology 22(2), 84–97 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Efklides, A., Petkaki, C.: Effects of mood on students’ metacognitive experiences. Learning and Instruction 15(5), 415–431 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoffman, M.L.: Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge Univ. Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Horgan, D.D., Morgan, D.: Chess expertise in children. Applied Cognitive Psychology 4(2), 109–128 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Isen, A.M., Reeve, J.: The influence of positive affect on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Facilitating enjoyment of play, responsible work behavior, and self-control. Motivation and Emotion 29(4), 295–323 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kapoor, A., Burleson, W., Picard, R.W.: Automatic prediction of frustration. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65(8), 724–736 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kapoor, A., Picard, R.W.: Multimodal affect recognition in learning environments. In: ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 677–682 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Keltner, D., Ellsworth, P.C., Edwards, K.: Beyond simple pessimism: Effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64, 740–740 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Leite, I., Martinho, C., Pereira, A., Paiva, A.: iCat: an affective game buddy based on anticipatory mechanisms. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2008, pp. 1229–1232. IFAAMAS (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Leite, I., Martinho, C., Pereira, A., Paiva, A.: As Time goes by: Long-term evaluation of social presence in robotic companions. In: Proceedings of RO-MAN 2009, pp. 669–674. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Leite, I., Mascarenhas, S., Pereira, A., Martinho, C., Prada, R., Paiva, A.: ”Why Can’t We Be Friends?” An Empathic Game Companion for Long-Term Interaction. In: Safonova, A. (ed.) IVA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6356, pp. 315–321. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lester, J.C., Converse, S.A., Kahler, S.E., Barlow, S.T., Stone, B.A., Bhogal, R.S.: The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. In: Proceedings of CHI 1997, pp. 359–366. ACM, NY (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nakano, Y.I., Ishii, R.: Estimating user’s engagement from eye-gaze behaviors in human-agent conversations. In: Proceeding of IUI 2010, pp. 139–148. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Robison, J., McQuiggan, S., Lester, J.: Evaluating the consequences of affective feedback in intelligent tutoring systems. In: Proceedings of ACII 2009. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Russell, J.A.: A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 1161–1178 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Saerbeck, M., Schut, T., Bartneck, C., Janse, M.: Expressive robots in education: varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor. In: Proceedings of CHI 2010, pp. 1613–1622. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sanghvi, J., Castellano, G., Leite, I., Pereira, A., McOwan, P.W., Paiva, A.: Automatic analysis of affective postures and body motion to detect engagement with a game companion. In: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Lausanne, Switzerland (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sidner, C.L., Kidd, C.D., Lee, C., Lesh, N.: Where to look: a study of human-robot engagement. In: Proc. of IUI 2004, pp. 78–84. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tiberius, R.G.: The why of teacher/student relationships. Essays on Teaching Excellence 31 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  36. van Breemen, A., Yan, X., Meerbeek, B.: iCat: an animated user-interface robot with personality. In: Proc. of AAMAS 2005, pp. 143–144. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Woolf, B., Burleson, W., Arroyo, I., Dragon, T., Cooper, D., Picard, R.: Affect-aware tutors: recognising and responding to student affect. International Journal of Learning Technology 4(3), 129–164 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Leite, I., Pereira, A., Castellano, G., Mascarenhas, S., Martinho, C., Paiva, A. (2012). Modelling Empathy in Social Robotic Companions. In: Ardissono, L., Kuflik, T. (eds) Advances in User Modeling. UMAP 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7138. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28509-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28509-7_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28508-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28509-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics