Skip to main content

Four Basic Human Needs at the Heart of Neuroscience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neuroleadership

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 2617 Accesses

Abstract

The brain is a complex organ and the variations in human behaviour are also a seemingly endless sea of subtle differences. This poses many challenges in trying to find clearer answers to human behaviour in any context but also specifically in the context of business administration. This chapter therefore aims to go to the basis of human behaviour. We draw on the work of Klaus Grawe to highlight how neuroscience has combined with psychotherapy and psychology to understand what the very neural substrates are at the basis of human behaviour. This chapter takes us through what we can see as the neuroscientifically founded basic needs of human beings and how this will subsequently influence each of our motivational behaviours and hence our way of interacting with the world around us.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the sake of simplicity we have not differentiated here between psychology and organisational psychology whereby organisational psychology looks into the experience and perceptions of individuals in organisations.

References

  • Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2008). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of mind (excerpt). In Cognitive neuroscience the biology of mind (pp. 148–159). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grawe, K. (2007). Review of neuropsychotherapy: How the neurosciences inform effective psychotherapy and neuropsychotherapie (neuropsychotherapy), (Vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 118–120). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S., & Weiner, I. B. (2003). Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality. In M. J. Lerner (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology volume 5 personality and social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 159–184). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J., Ainsworth, M., & Bretherton, I. (1992). The origins of attachment theory. Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 759–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feist, E. & Primis, H., 2010. Psychology: Making connections, Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J., 1951. Maternal Care and Mental Health, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, H. F. (1958). The nature of love. The American Psychologist, 13(2), 673–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiesen, A. S., Ransjö-Arvidson, A. B., Nissen, E., & Uvnäs-Moberg, K. (2001). Postpartum maternal oxytocin release by newborns: effects of infant hand massage and sucking. Birth Berkeley Calif, 28(1), 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, L.F., 2002. Bonding Matters: The Chemistry of Attachment. Attachment Parenting International News, 5(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, M. S., Humbert, R., Dixen, J., Palmisano, G., Greenleaf, W., & Davidson, J. M. (1987). Plasma oxytocin increases in the human sexual response. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 64(1), 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosfeld, M. et al., 2005. Oxytocin increases trust in humans, Nature Publishing Group.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, O. (2006). Mikropolitik und moral in organisationen. Stuttgart: UTB GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, P. J. (1998). Fear, vigilance, and ambiguity: Initial neuroimaging studies of the human amygdala. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(6), 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cast, A. D., & Burke, P. (2002). A theory of self-esteem. Social Forces, 80(3), 1041–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grawe, K. (2006). Neuropsychotherapy: How the neurosciences inform effective psychotherapy. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyurak, A., Hooker, C. I., Miyakawa, A., Verosky, S., Luerssen, A., & Ayduk, O. N. (2011). Individual differences in neural responses to social rejection: the joint effect of self-esteem and attentional control. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 19(3), 279–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, L. H., Kelley, W. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (2010). Self-esteem modulates medial prefrontal cortical responses to evaluative social feedback. Cerebral Cortex, 20(12), 3005–3013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, N. I., Inagaki, T. K., Muscatell, K. A., Byrne Haltom, K. E., & Leary, M. R. (Nov. 2011). The neural sociometer: Brain mechanisms underlying state self-esteem. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3448–3455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korsten, N., Fragopanagos, N., Taylor, J. G. (2007). Neural substructures for appraisal in emotion: Self-esteem and depression. Proceedings of the 17th international conference on artificial neural networks, pp. 850–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. M. (2006). An integrative neuroscience model of ‘significance’ processing. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 5(1), 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGilchrist, I. (2009). The master and his emissary: The divided brain and the making of the Western world. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait raitings (Technical report ASD-TR-61-97). Wiley Online Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. The American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saulsman, L. (2004). The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(8), 1055–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosse Holtforth, M., Pincus, A. L., Grawe, K., Mauler, B., & Castonguay, L. G. (2007). When what you want is not what you get: Motivational correlates of interpersonal problems in clinical and nonclinical samples. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(10), 1095–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosse Holtforth, M., & Grawe, K. (2000). Fragebogen zur Analyse Motivationaler Schemata (FAMOS). Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 29(3), 170–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosse Holtforth, M., & Grawe, K. (2003). Der Inkongruenzfragebogen (INK). Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 32(4), 315–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (2007). Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: A threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries. The Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 595–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Professional manual: Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kumari, V., et al. (2004). Personality predicts brain responses to cognitive demands. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 10636–10641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ghadiri, A., Habermacher, A., Peters, T. (2012). Four Basic Human Needs at the Heart of Neuroscience. In: Neuroleadership. Management for Professionals. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30165-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics