Abstract
Optic flow displays are frequently used both in spatial cognition/psy-chology research and VR simulations to avoid the influence of recognizable landmarks. However, optic flow displays not only lead to frequent misperceptions of simulated turns, but also to drastic qualitative errors: When asked to point back to the origin of locomotion after viewing simulated 2-segment excursions in VR, between 40% (Riecke 2008) and 100% (Klatzky et al., 1998) of participants responded as if they failed to update and incorporate the visually simulated turns into their responses. To further investigate such ”NonTurner” behaviour, the current study used a wider range of path geometries that allow for clearer disambiguation of underlying strategies and mental processes. 55% of participants showed clear qualitative pointing errors (left-right hemisphere errors), thus confirming the reliability of the effect and the difficulties in properly using optic flow even in high-quality VR displays. Results suggest that these qualitative errors are not caused by left-right mirrored responses, but are indeed based on a failure to properly incorporate visually presented turns into point-to-origin responses. While the majority of these qualitative errors could be attributed to NonTurner behaviour as previously proposed, we identified a novel, modified NonTurner strategy that could reconcile prior findings. Finally, results suggest that Turners (which properly incorporate visually presented turns) might use online updating of the homing direction, whereas NonTurners resort to more effortful and cognitively demanding offline strategies. Better understanding these strategies and underlying processes and how they depend on stimulus and display parameters can help to inform the design of more effective VR simulations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Avraamides, M.N., Kelly, J.W.: Multiple systems of spatial memory and action. Cognitive Processing 9, 93–106 (2008)
Avraamides, M.N., Klatzky, R.L., Loomis, J.M., Golledge, R.G.: Use of cognitive versus perceptual heading during imagined locomotion depends on the response mode. Psychological Science 15(6), 403–408 (2004)
Batschelet, E.: Circular statistics in biology. Acad. Pr., London (1981)
Chance, S.S., Gaunet, F., Beall, A.C., Loomis, J.M.: Locomotion mode affects the updating of objects encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs to path integration. Presence - Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7(2), 168–178 (1998)
Coluccia, E., Louse, G.: Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24(3), 329–340 (2004)
Easton, R.D., Sholl, M.J.: Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology– Learning, Memory and Cognition 21(2), 483–500 (1995)
Etienne, A.S., Jeffery, K.J.: Path integration in mammals. Hippocampus 14(2), 180–192 (2004)
Farrell, M.J., Robertson, I.H.: Mental rotation and the automatic updating of body-centered spatial relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology– Learning Memory and Cognition 24(1), 227–233 (1998)
Fujita, N., Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., Golledge, R.G.: A minimal representation for dead-reckoning in navigation: Updating the homing vector. Geographical Analysis 22(4), 326–335 (1990)
Gallistel, C.R.: The organization of learning. Learning, development, and conceptual change. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)
Golledge, R.G.: Wayfinding behavior: cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. JHU Press (1999)
Gramann, K.: Embodiment of Spatial Reference Frames and Individual Differences in Reference Frame Proclivity. Spatial Cognition and Computation (2012) (online pre-print), doi:10.1080/13875868.2011.589038
Gramann, K., Muller, H.J., Eick, E.M., Schonebeck, B.: Evidence of separable spatial representations in a virtual navigation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology–Human Perception and Performance 31(6), 1199–1223 (2005)
Gramann, K., Onton, J., Riccobon, D., Mueller, H.J., Bardins, S., Makeig, S.: Human brain dynamics accompanying use of egocentric and allocentric reference frames during navigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(12), 2836–2849 (2010)
Gramann, K., Wing, S., Jung, T.-P., Viirre, E., Riecke, B.E.: Switching spatial reference frames for yaw and pitch navigation. Spatial Cognition and Computation 12(2-3), 159–194 (2012), doi:10.1080/13875868.2011.645176
Klatzky, R.L., Loomis, J.M., Beall, A.C., Chance, S.S., Golledge, R.G.: Spatial updating of Self-Position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science 9(4), 293–298 (1998)
Lawton, C.A., Morrin, K.A.: Gender differences in pointing accuracy in Computer-Simulated 3D mazes. Sex Roles 40(1-2), 73–92 (1999)
Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., Golledge, R.G., Philbeck, J.W.: Human navigation by path integration. In: Golledge, R.G. (ed.) Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and other Spatial Processes, pp. 125–151. Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (1999)
Mahmood, O., Adamo, D., Briceno, E., Moffat, S.D.: Age differences in visual path integration. Behavioural Brain Research 205(1), 88–95 (2009)
Maurer, R., Séguinot, V.: What is modelling for?– a critical review of the models of path integration. Journal of Theoretical Biology 175(4), 457–475 (1995)
May, M.: Cognitive and embodied modes of spatial imagery. Psychologische Beiträge 38(3/4), 418–434 (1996)
May, M., Klatzky, R.L.: Path integration while ignoring irrelevant movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology– Learning, Memory and Cognition 26(1), 169–186 (2000)
Müller, M., Wehner, R.: Path integration in desert ants cataglyphis fortis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 85(14), 5287–5290 (1988)
Müller, M., Wehner, R.: Path integration provides a scaffold for landmark learning in desert ants. Current Biology 20(15), 1368–1371 (2010)
Presson, C.C., Montello, D.R.: Updating after rotational and translational body movements: Coordinate structure of perspective space. Perception 23(12), 1447–1455 (1994)
Riecke, B.E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Bülthoff, H.H.: Perceiving simulated Ego-Motions in virtual reality - comparing large screen displays with HMDs. In: Proceedings of the SPIE, San Jose, CA, USA, vol. 5666, pp. 344–355 (2005a)
Riecke, B.E.: How far can we get with just visual information? Path integration and spatial updating studies in virtual reality, Logos, Berlin, vol. 8 (2003), http://www.logos-verlag.de/cgi-bin/buch/isbn/0440
Riecke, B.E.: Consistent Left-Right reversals for visual path integration in virtual reality: More than a failure to update one’s heading? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 17(2), 143–175 (2008)
Riecke, B.E., Cunningham, D.W., Bülthoff, H.H.: Spatial updating in virtual reality: the sufficiency of visual information. Psychological Research 71(3), 298–313 (2007)
Riecke, B.E., Heyde, M.V.D., Bülthoff, H.H.: Visual cues can be sufficient for triggering automatic, reflexlike spatial updating. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 2, 183–215 (2005b); ACM ID: 1077401
Riecke, B.E., van Veen, H.A.H.C., Bülthoff, H.H.: Visual homing is possible without landmarks: a path integration study in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 11, 443–473 (2002); ACM ID: 772746
Rieser, J.J.: Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15(6), 1157–1165 (1989)
Shepard, R.N., Metzler, J.: Mental rotation of 3-Dimensional objects. Science 171(3972), 701–703 (1971)
Sigurdarson, S., Milne, A.P., Feuereissen, D., Riecke, B.E.: Can phys-i-cal motions pre-vent dis-ori-en-ta-tion in nat-u-ral-is-tic VR? Orange County, CA, USA (2012)
Stumpf, H., Fay, E.: Schlauchfiguren - Ein Test zur Beurteilung des räumlichen Vorstellungsvermögens. Hogrefe, Göttingen (1983)
Wiener, J.M., Berthoz, A., Wolbers, T.: Dissociable cognitive mechanisms underlying human path integration. Experimental Brain Research 208(1), 61–71 (2011)
Wiener, J.M., Mallot, H.A.: Path complexity does not impair visual path integration. Spatial Cognition and Computation 6(4), 333–346 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Riecke, B.E. (2012). Are Left-Right Hemisphere Errors in Point-to-Origin Tasks in VR Caused by Failure to Incorporate Heading Changes?. In: Stachniss, C., Schill, K., Uttal, D. (eds) Spatial Cognition VIII. Spatial Cognition 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7463. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32732-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32732-2_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32731-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32732-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)