Skip to main content

On MultiView-Based Meta-learning for Automatic Quality Assessment of Wiki Articles

  • Conference paper
Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7489))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The Internet has seen a surge of new types of repositories with free access and collaborative open edition. However, this large amount of information, made available democratically and virtually without any control, raises questions about its quality. In this work, we investigate the use of meta-learning techniques to combine sets of semantically related quality indicators (aka, views) in order to automatically assess the quality of wiki articles. The idea is inspired on the combination of multiple (quality) experts. We perform a thorough analysis of the proposed multiview-based meta-learning approach in 3 collections. In our experiments, meta-learning was able to improve the performance of a state-of-the-art method in all tested datasets, with gains of up to 27% in quality assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wikipedia: Version 1.0 editorial team/release version criteria (2012), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:1.0/Criteria

  2. Wikipedia: Version 1.0 editorial team/assessment (2012), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Assessment

  3. Hu, M., Lim, E.P., Sun, A., Lauw, H.W., Vuong, B.Q.: Measuring article quality in wikipedia: models and evaluation. In: CIKM 2007, pp. 243–252 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dondio, P., Barrett, S., Weber, S., Seigneur, J.-M.: Extracting Trust from Domain Analysis: A Case Study on the Wikipedia Project. In: Yang, L.T., Jin, H., Ma, J., Ungerer, T. (eds.) ATC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4158, pp. 362–373. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Rassbach, L., Pincock, T., Mingus, B.: Exploring the feasibility of automatically rating online article quality (2007), http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/wikimania2007/d/d3/RassbachPincockMingus07.pdf

  6. Dalip, D.H., Gonçalves, M.A., Cristo, M., Calado, P.: Automatic assessment of document quality in web collaborative digital libraries. ACM JDIQ 2(13) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dalip, D.H., Gonçalves, M.A., Cristo, M., Calado, P.: Automatic quality assessment of content created collaboratively by web communities: a case study of Wikipedia. In: JCDL 2009, pp. 295–304 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vapnik, V.N.: The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kakade, S.M., Foster, D.P.: Multi-view Regression Via Canonical Correlation Analysis. In: Bshouty, N.H., Gentile, C. (eds.) COLT 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4539, pp. 82–96. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Han, J., Wang, C., Jiang, D.: Probabilistic Quality Assessment Based on Article’s Revision History. In: Hameurlain, A., Liddle, S.W., Schewe, K.-D., Zhou, X. (eds.) DEXA 2011, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6861, pp. 574–588. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Korfiatis, N., Poulos, M., Bokos, G.: Evaluating authoritative sources using social networks: An insight from wikipedia. Online Information Review 30(3), 252–262 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu, Y., Luo, T.: Measuring article quality in wikipedia: Lexical clue model. In: 2011 3rd Symposium on Web Society (SWS), pp. 141–146 (October 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Coleman, M., Liau, T.L.: A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. Journal of Applied Psychology 60(2), 283–284 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolpert, D.H.: Stacked generalization. Neural Networks 5, 241–259 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Drucker, H., Burges, C.J.C., Kaufman, L., Smola, A.J., Vapnik, V.: Support vector regression machines. In: Mozer, M., Jordan, M.I., Petsche, T. (eds.) NIPS, pp. 155–161. MIT Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smith, E.A., Senter, R.J.: Automated readability index. Aerospace Medical Division (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brin, S., Page, L.: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30(1-7), 107–117 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiss, G.M., Provost, F.: Learning when training data are costly: The effect of class distribution on tree induction. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 19, 315–354 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Fleiss, J.L., Cohen, J.: The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement 33(3), 613–619 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dalip, D.H., Gonçalves, M.A., Cristo, M., Calado, P. (2012). On MultiView-Based Meta-learning for Automatic Quality Assessment of Wiki Articles. In: Zaphiris, P., Buchanan, G., Rasmussen, E., Loizides, F. (eds) Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries. TPDL 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7489. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33290-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33290-6_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33289-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33290-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics