Skip to main content

Dark Retweets: Investigating Non-conventional Retweeting Patterns

  • Conference paper
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7710))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Retweets are an important mechanism for recognising propagation of information on the Twitter social media platform. However, many retweets do not use the official retweet mechanism, or even community established conventions, and these “dark retweets” are not accounted for in many existing analysis. In this paper, a comprehensive matrix of tweet propagation is presented to show the different nuances of retweeting, based on seven characteristics: whether it is proprietary, the mechanism used, whether it is directed to followers or non-followers, whether it mentions other users, if it is explicitly propagating another tweet, if it links to an original tweet, and what is the audience it is pushed to. Based on this matrix and two assumptions of retweetability, the degrees of a retweet’s “darkness” can be determined. This matrix was evaluated over 2.3 million tweets and it was found that dark retweets amounted to 12.86% (for search results less than 1500 tweets per URL) and 24.7% (for search results including more than 1500 tweets per URL) respectively. By extrapolating these results with those found in existing studies, potentially thousands of retweets may be hidden from existing studies on retweets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boyd, D., Golder, S., Lotan, G.: Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., Gunmadi, K.P.: Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. In: International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. AAAI (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mustafaraj, E., Metaxas, P.: From obscurity to prominence in minutes: Political speech and real-time search. In: Proceedings of the WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line, Raleigh, NC: US (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adar, E., Zhang, L., Adamic, L.A., Lukose, R.M.: Implicit structure and the dynamics of blogspace. In: Workshop on the Weblogging Ecosystem, WWW 2004, New York, NY (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Matsumura, N., Yamamoto, H., Tomozawa, D.: Finding influencers and consumer insights in the blogosphere. In: International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. AAAI (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Galuba, W., Aberer, K., Chakraborty, D., Despotovic, Z., Kellerer, W.: Outtweeting the twitterers- predicting information cascades in microblogs. In: 3rd Workshop on Online Social Networks, Boston, MA, USA. USENIX (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wu, S., Hofman, J.M., Mason, W.A., Watts, D.J.: Who says what to whom on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW 2011). ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bakshy, E., Hofman, J.M., Mason, W.A., Watts, D.J.: Identifying ‘influencers’ on Twitter. In: Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nagarajan, M., Purohit, H., Sheth, A.: A qualitative examination of topical tweet and retweet practices. In: International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. AAAI (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., Chi, E.H.: Want to be retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in Twitter network. In: IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing, pp. 177–184. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.: What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, pp. 591–600. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Azman, N., Millard, D.E., Weal, M.J. (2012). Dark Retweets: Investigating Non-conventional Retweeting Patterns. In: Aberer, K., Flache, A., Jager, W., Liu, L., Tang, J., Guéret, C. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7710. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35386-4_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35386-4_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35385-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35386-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics