Skip to main content

Subset Space vs Relational Semantics of Bimodal Logic: Bringing Out the Difference

  • Conference paper
Logical Foundations of Computer Science (LFCS 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7734))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Correspondence theory regarding the bimodal language for subset spaces can be based on a certain pseudo-monadic second-order language arising from the relevant semantics. Since the latter language is reducible to a two-sorted language of first-order predicate logic, one can apply well-established model-theoretic techniques to studying expressivity issues. In this way, a subset space analogue to a popular definability result of ordinary modal logic is proved first in this paper. On the other hand, subset spaces can easily be related to usual Kripke models, for which we have a (one-sorted) relational first-order correspondence language. Both of the concurrent correspondents are then used in the main part of the paper, where, among other things, some Goldblatt-Thomason style results as related to subset frames are proved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiello, M., van Benthem, J., Bezhanishvili, G.: Reasoning about space: The modal way. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(6), 889–920 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Aiello, M., Pratt-Hartmann, I.E., van Benthem, J.F.A.K.: Handbook of Spatial Logics. Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Başkent, C.: Topics in Subset Space Logic. Master’s thesis, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, Universiteit van Amsterdam (July 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 53. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. ten Cate, B., Gabelaia, D., Sustretov, D.: Modal languages for topology: Expressivity and definability. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 159, 146–170 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang, C.C., Keisler, H.J.: Model Theory, 3rd edn. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 73. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dabrowski, A., Moss, L.S., Parikh, R.: Topological reasoning and the logic of knowledge. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 78, 73–110 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.Y.: Reasoning about Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Flum, J., Ziegler, M.: Topological Model Theory. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 769. Springer, Berlin (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Georgatos, K.: Modal Logics of Topological Spaces. Ph.D. thesis, City University of New York (May 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Georgatos, K.: Updating knowledge using subsets. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 21(3-4), 427–441 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Heinemann, B.: A hybrid logic for reasoning about knowledge and topology. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17(1), 19–41 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Heinemann, B.: ‘Topologic’ can be more expressive. In: Proc. 8th Panhellenic Logic Symposium, Ioannina, Greece, pp. 58–62 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heinemann, B.: Characterizing Certain Topological Specifications. In: Hirsch, E.A., Karhumäki, J., Lepistö, A., Prilutskii, M. (eds.) CSR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7353, pp. 184–195. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Moss, L.S., Parikh, R.: Topological reasoning and the logic of knowledge. In: Moses, Y. (ed.) Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge (TARK 1992), pp. 95–105. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Heinemann, B. (2013). Subset Space vs Relational Semantics of Bimodal Logic: Bringing Out the Difference. In: Artemov, S., Nerode, A. (eds) Logical Foundations of Computer Science. LFCS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7734. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35722-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35722-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35721-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35722-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics