Skip to main content

Human-Robot Interaction: Testing Distances that Humans will Accept Between Themselves and a Robot Approaching at Different Speeds

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Ambient Assisted Living

Abstract

Service robotics has great potential for helping people to live independent lives in their own homes. However, if this potential is to be fully exploited in the near future, research and development cannot limit itself to solving the technological challenges involved. The only way to develop service robots that people will accept is to get potential users involved in the process as early as possible. With that in mind, this study investigates human-robot interaction from the perspective of a service robot approaching the user at varying speeds. We developed an empirical study to measure the distance that humans will accept between themselves and a robot when approached by that robot. The results show that the robot’s speed and the test subject’s body position significantly affect the accepted distance. We also found that the physical appearance of humanoid service robots has no substantial bearing on the accepted distance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mori, M.: The Uncanny Valley. In: Energy, 7(4), pp. 33–35, Translated by Karl F. MacDorman and Takashi Minato (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mizoguchi, H., Sato, T., Takagi, K., Nakao, M., Hatamura, Y.: Realization of expressive mobile robot. Robotics and Automation, Proceedings, 1997 IEEE International Conference, pp. 581–586 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duffy, B. R.: Anthropomorphism and Robotics. The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour, 20

    Google Scholar 

  4. Oestricher, L.: Cognitive, social, sociable or just socially acceptable robots? In: 16th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 558–563 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., Powers, A.: Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: Robot and Human Interactive Communication: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Workshop, pp. 55–60 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Walters, M.L., Dautenhahn, K., te Boekhorst R., Koay, K.L., Woods, S.N.: Exploring the design of robot appearance and behavior in an attention-seeking “Living Room” scenario for a robot companion. In: IEEE: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life, pp. 341–347 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Walters, M.L., Dautenhahn, K., Koay, K.L., Kaouri, C., Boekhorst, R., Nehaniv, C., Werry, I., Lee, D.: Close encounters: spatial distances between people and a robot of mechanistic appearance. In: Humanoid Robots, 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference, pp. 450–455 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Walters, M.L., Dautenhahn, K., te Boekhorst, R., Kheng Lee Koay, Kaouri, C., Woods, S., Nehaniv, C., Lee, D., Werry, I.: The influence of subjects’ personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment. In: Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ROMAN, IEEE International Workshop, pp. 347–352 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. MacDorman, K.F.: Subjective ratings of robot video clips for human likeness, familiarity, and eeriness: An exploration of the uncanny valley. In: ICCS/CogSci-2006 long symposium: toward social mechanisms of android science, Vancouver (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bischof, N.: Struktur und Bedeutung. Hans Huber, Eine Einführung in die Systemtheorie für Psychologen. Bern (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ikuta, K., Ishii, H., Nokata, M.: Safety evaluation method of design and control for human-care robots. The Int. J. Robot. Res. 22(5), 281–297 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Traver, V.J., del Pobil, A.P., Perez-Francisco, M.: Making service robots human-safe. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2000). Proceedings, Vol. 1, 2000, pp. 696–701

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yamada, Y., Yamamoto, T., Morizono, T., Umetani, Y.: FTAbased issues on securing human safety in a human/robot coexistence system. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics. IEEE SMC’99 conference proceedings, Vol. 2, pp. 1058–1063 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. In: Int. J. Soc. Robot. Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 71–81 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jochems, N.: Altersdifferenzierte Gestaltung der Mensch-Rechner-Interaktion am Beispiel von Projektmanagementaufgaben. In: Schlick, C. (ed.) Industrial Engineering and Ergonomics. Shaker Verlag, Aachen (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mertens, A., Reiser, U., Brenken, B., Lüdtke, M., Hägele, M., Verl, A., Brandl, C., Schlick, C.: Assistive robots in eldercare and daily living: automation of individual services for senior citizens. In: Jeschke, S., Liu, H., Schilberg, D. (eds.) Intelligent Robotics and Applications—Fourth International Conference, ICIRA 2011, pp. 542–552. Springer Verlag, Berlin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marquie, J.C., Jourdan-Boddaert, L., Huet, N.: Do older adults underestimate their actual computer knowledge? Behav. Inf. Technol. 21(4), 273–280 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reed, K., Doty, H.D., May, D.R.: The impact of aging on self-effcacy and computer skill acquisition. J. Manag. Issues 17(2), 212–228 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Karrer, K., Glaser, C., Clemens, C., Bruder, C.: Technikaffinität erfassen—der Fragebogen TA-EG. In: Lichtenstein, A., Stößel, C., Clemens, C. (Hrsg.) Der Mensch im Mittelpunkt technischer Systeme, 8. Berliner Werkstatt Mensch-Maschine-Systeme (ZMMS Spektrum, Vol. 22, No. 29). Düsseldorf: VDI Verlag GmbH, pp. 196–201 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Luczak, H.: Untersuchungen informatorischer Belastung und Beanspruchung des Menschen. Fortschrittberichte der VDI-Zeitschrift, Vol. 10, No. 2, Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., Grote, K.H.: Konstruktionslehre. Springer Verlag, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brandl, C., Mertens, A., Bröhl, C., Mayer, M., Schlick, C.: Akzeptanzorientierte Gestaltung von Innovationen bei technikunterstützten personenbezogenen Dienstleistungen, In: Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft e.V. (Hrsg.) Gestaltung nachhaltiger Arbeitssysteme - Wege zur gesunden, effizienten und sicheren Arbeit, Dortmund: GfA-Press, pp. 483–486 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 38(3), 475–487 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on intervention. Dec. Sci. 39(2), 273–315 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kollmann, T.: Akzeptanz innovativer Nutzungsgüter und –systeme. Gabler, Wiesbaden (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoch, A., Simons, F., Haag, M., Parlitz, C., Reiser, U., Hägele, M.: Care-O-bot® 3—Mobiler Serviceroboter mit ausgeprägter Manipulationsfähigkeit. In: Kompetenznetzwerk Mechatronik BW: Intelligente mechatronische Systeme: Internationales Forum Mechatronik, begleitend zur MOTEK, Stuttgart. Göppingen, pp. 360–371 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schlick, C., Bruder, R., Luczak, H.: Arbeitswissenschaft. Springer Verlag, Berlin (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Haas, H.-J.: Sport im Alter—Leistungsphysiologie. In: van den Berg, F., Wulf, D. (eds.) Angewandte Physiologie. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bortz, J.: Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer Medizin Verlag, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the subjects who took part in the study. This paper is part of the research project “Tech4P—Strategien für die Technikintegration bei personenbezogenen Dienstleistungen”, which is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (funding code: 01FG1004). The German Aerospace Center (DLR) is managing the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Mertens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mertens, A. et al. (2014). Human-Robot Interaction: Testing Distances that Humans will Accept Between Themselves and a Robot Approaching at Different Speeds. In: Wichert, R., Klausing, H. (eds) Ambient Assisted Living. Advanced Technologies and Societal Change. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37988-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37988-8_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37987-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37988-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics