Skip to main content

Introduction to the Arctic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Arctic Marine Governance

Abstract

Climate change is occurring rapidly in the Arctic, bringing new economic opportunities alongside challenges for environmental governance in the region. Evaluating these changes, and options for effectively addressing them, requires an understanding of existing institutions and frameworks. This chapter provides a foundation for the book and an introduction to Arctic marine governance and transatlantic cooperation, setting the scene with sections on the spatial scope of the Arctic marine area, the law of the sea in the Arctic marine area, the Arctic Council, and the respective Arctic and marine policies of the European Union and the United States.

Based on Molenaa EJ., Corell R, Koivurova T, Cavalieri S. (2008) Introduction to the background papers. Arctic TRANSFORM. 8 Sept 2008.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the domain of straddling and highly migratory fish stocks, however, the US is subject to Part XV of the LOS Convention due to its being a party to the Fish Stocks Agreement. See also Reagan (1983).

  2. 2.

    Terms such as the ‘Canadian Arctic Archipelago’ and the ‘Spitsbergen Archipelago’, even if used consistently by Canada and Norway, do not imply that these states qualify—or claim to qualify—as archipelagic states in the domain of the international law of the sea.

  3. 3.

    See the Joint Statement by the then Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs Pettigrew and then Danish Minister of Foreign Affairs Møller made in New York on 19 Sept 2005 and the short article by P.E.D. Kristensen, then Ambassador of Denmark to Canada, published in the Ottawa Citizen on 28 July 2005, which place the dispute in the proper perspective of the good and ongoing cooperation between the two states.

  4. 4.

    To be more specific, AMSA’s recommendation was for “updating and mandatory application of relevant parts of the Guidelines for Ships Operating in Arctic Ice-covered Waters (Arctic Shipping Guidelines)”. Those were adopted in 2002, and since then the AMSA report was published in April 2009 and the ‘Guidelines for ships operating in polar waters’ were adopted by the 26th IMO Assembly in November–December 2009); the AMSA recommendation referred to the earlier 2002 Guidelines.

  5. 5.

    Notable state initiatives include: Marine Life Protection Act (California), Territorial Sea Plan (Oregon), Puget Sound Partnership and Marine Waters Planning and Management Act (Washington), Ocean and Great Lakes Ecosystem Conservation Act (New York), Massachusetts Ocean Act (Massachusetts), and the Rhode Island Ocean Special Area Management Plan (Rhode Island).

References

  • ACIA (2005) Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • ACMA (1977) Alaska Coastal Management Act. AS 46.40

    Google Scholar 

  • AEPS (1991) Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy, 14 Jan 1991, 30 I.L.M. 1624

    Google Scholar 

  • AMAP (1997) Arctic Pollution Issues: A State of the Arctic Environment Report. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • AMSA (2009) Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment 2009 Report. Arctic Council, Apr 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Arctic SAR Agreement (2011) Agreement on Cooperation on Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue in the Arctic, 12 May 2011, 50 I.L.M. 1119 (2011). Entered into force on 19 Jan 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Arctic Shipping Guidelines (2002) Guidelines for Ships Operating in Arctic Ice-covered Waters, IMO MSC/Circ. 1056, MEPC/Circ. 399, 23 Dec 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartenstein K (2011) The “Arctic Exception” in the Law of the Sea Convention: A Contribution to Safer Navigation in the Northwest Passage? Ocean Dev Int Law 42:22–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clean Water Act (1972) 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Coastal Zone Management Act (1972) 16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2009) Council conclusions on Arctic issues, 2985th Foreign Affairs Council Meeting (8 Dec 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Environmental Quality (2010) Final Recommendations of the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force. 19 July 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Division for Ocean Affairs and Law of the Sea (2013) United Nations. <http://www.un.org/Depts/los/index.htm>. Accessed 31 Jan 2013

  • EEA Agreement (1993) Agreement on the European Economic Area, 17 Mar 1993. Entered into force 1 Jan 1994

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2007a) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: an Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union, 10 Oct 2007, COM (2007) 575 final

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2007b) Accompanying Document to the Integrated Maritime Policy, 10 Oct 2007, SEC (2007) 1278

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: the European Union and the Arctic Region, 20 Nov 2008, COM (2008) 763

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission and High Representative (2012) Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council. Developing a European Union Policy towards the Arctic Region: progress since 2008 and next steps, European Commission and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, 26 June 2012, JOIN (2012) 19 final

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2008) Arctic Governance. European Parliament resolution of 9 Oct 2008 on Arctic governance, P6_TA(2008)0474

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2011) A sustainable EU policy for the High North. European Parliament resolution of 20 Jan 2011 on a sustainable EU policy for the High North (2009/2214(INI)), 20 Jan 2011, P7_TA(2011)0024

    Google Scholar 

  • Exec. Order No. 13547 (2010) Stewardship of the Ocean, Our Coasts, and the Great Lakes. 10 July 2010, 75 Fed. Reg. 43,023

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish Stocks Agreement (1995) Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks, 4 Aug 1995, 2167 U.N.T.S. 3. Entered into force 11 Dec 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • High Representative and European Commission (2008) Paper from the High Representative and the European Commission to the European Council. Climate Change and International Security, 14 Mar 2008, S113/08

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys A (2012) New proposal would see Hans Island split equally between Canada and Denmark. National Post, 11 Apr 2012. Available at: <http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/04/11/new-proposal-would-see-hans-island-split-equally-between-canada-and-denmark/>

  • Ilulissat Declaration (2008) Arctic Ocean Conference. Ilulissat, Greenland. 27 May 2008, 48 I.L.M. 382 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivurova T (2009) A note on the European Union’s integrated maritime policy. Ocean Dev Int Law 40:171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivurova T, VanderZwaag DL (2007) The Arctic Council at 10 Years: Retrospect and Prospects. Univ British Columbia Law Rev 40:121–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivurova T, Kokko K, Duyck S, Sellheim N, Stepien A (2010) EU Competencies Affecting the Arctic: Directorate General for External Policies of the Union. Directorate B Policy Department Study

    Google Scholar 

  • LOS Convention (1982) United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 10 Dec 1982, 1833 U.N.T.S. 396. Entered into force 16 Nov 1994

    Google Scholar 

  • Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act (1972) 16 U.S.C. 1401 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Marine Strategy Framework Directive (2008) Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 17 June 2009 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy, June 17 2009, 2008 O.J. (L 164)

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar EJ (2012) Fisheries Regulation in the Maritime Zones of Svalbard. Int J Mar Coast Law 27:3–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murmansk Treaty (2010) Treaty between the Kingdom of Norway and the Russian Federation concerning Maritime Delimitation and Cooperation in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean, 15 Sept 2010, U.N.T.S. Reg. No. 49095. Entered into force 7 July 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • National Ocean Council (2012) Draft National Ocean Policy Implementation Plan, 12 Jan 2012. <http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ceq/national_ocean_policy_draft_implementation_plan_01-12-12.pdf>. Accessed 5 Feb 2013

  • NSPD-66 (2009) National Security Presidential Directive and Homeland Security Presidential Directive. Arctic Region Policy, 9 Jan 2009, NSPD-66/HSPD-25

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuuk Declaration (2011) Nuuk Declaration on the occasion of the Seventh Ministerial Meeting of the Arctic Council. 12 May 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottawa Declaration (1996) Declaration on the Establishment of the Arctic Council, 19 Sept 1996, 35 I.L.M. 1382 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (1975) 43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • PAME (2009) Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas Guidelines. Last updated 29 Apr 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Part XI Deep-Sea Mining Agreement (1994) Agreement relating to the Implementation of Part XI of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 Dec 1982, 28 July 1994. 1836 U.N.T.S. 3. Entered into force 28 July 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Polar Shipping Guidelines (2009) Guidelines for Ships Operating in Polar Waters, IMO Assembly Resolution A.1024(26), 2 Dec 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Reagan PR (1983) President Ronald Reagan, ‘Statement on United States Ocean Policy’ 19 Weekly Comp Pres Doc 383. 10 Mar 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach JA, Smith RW (1996) United States Responses to Excessive Maritime Claims, 2nd edn. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovaniemi Declaration (1991) Declaration on the Protection of the Arctic Environment, 14 June 1991, 30 I.L.M. 1624

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitsbergen Treaty (1920) Treaty concerning the Archipelago of Spitsbergen, 9 Feb 1920, 2 L.N.T.S. 7. Entered into force 14 Aug 1925

    Google Scholar 

  • TFEU (2008) Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Consolidated Version. O.J. C 115/47

    Google Scholar 

  • Treaty on European Union (2010) Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union, 2010 O.J. C 83/01

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of State (1992) Limits in the Seas. No. 112. United States Responses to Excessive Maritime Claims. Available at <http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/58381.pdf>. Accessed 5 Feb 2013

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik J. Molenaar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Molenaar, E.J., Koivurova, T., Tedsen, E., Reid, A., Hossain, K. (2014). Introduction to the Arctic. In: Tedsen, E., Cavalieri, S., Kraemer, R. (eds) Arctic Marine Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38595-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics