Skip to main content

Towards Multi-hazard Resilience as a New Engineering Paradigm for Safety and Security Provision of Built Environment

  • Conference paper
Transactions on Computational Science XVIII

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((TCOMPUTATSCIE,volume 7848))

Abstract

A new engineering paradigm of integrated safety and security provision for built environment is proposed. Evolution and limits of former safety paradigms are described. Definition of building/structure resilience is introduced. Differentiation of building/structure resilience from community resilience and organizational resilience are delineated. Main hypotheses for multi-hazard resilience paradigm development are introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carpenter, G.: Reinsurance Market Review 2010. Guy Capenter & Company (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. EU SEVESO II Directive, EU (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rasmussen, N.: The Reactor Safety Study WASH-1400. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  4. A Framework for an Integrated Risk Informed Decision Making Process, Insag-25. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Risk-Informed Decisionmaking for Science and Technology, Center for Technology and National Security Policy National Defense University, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Transportation security, Comprehensive Risk Assessments and Stronger Internal Controls Needed to Help Inform TSA Resource Allocation, GAO, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kröger, W.: Critical infrastructures at risk: A need for a new conceptual approach and extended analytical tools. In: Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 93(12), pp. 1781–1787 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bosher, L. (ed.): Hazards and the Built Environment: Attaining Built-in Resilience. Taylor and Francis, Loughborough University (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vale, L.J., Campanella, T.J.: The Resilient City: How Modern Cities Recover from Disaster. Oxford University Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burby, R.J., Deyle, R.E., Godschalk, D.R., Olshansky, R.B.: Creating Hazard Resilient Communities through Land-Use Planning. Natural Hazards Review 1(2) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Allenby, B., Fink, J.: Toward Inherently Secure and Resilient Societies. Science 309, 1034–1036 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Allenby, B.: Environmental Threats and National Security: An International Challenge to Science and Technology. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holling, C.S.: Resilience and Stability of Ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4, 1–23 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bodin, P., Wiman, B.: Resilience and other stability concepts in ecology: notes on their origin, validity and usefulness. ESS Bulletin 2(2), 33–43 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Resilience Alliance (1999), http://www.resalliance.org/

  16. Stockholm Resilience Centre (2007), http://www.stockholmresilience.org/

  17. Business continuity in Europe (2007), http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/emcc/content/source/eu04021a.htm?p1=reports&p2=null

  18. Standard on business continuity (2012), http://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/iso-22301-business-continuity/

  19. Domestic Security: Civil Contingencies and Resilience in the United Kingdom. Chatham House, UK (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. UK government counter-terrorism strategy (2011), https://www.mi5.gov.uk/home/news/news-by-category/government/new-government-counter-terrorism-strategy-published.html

  21. National Inrastructure Advisory Council: Critical Infrastructure Resilience (2009), http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/niac/niac_critical_infrastructure_resilience.pdf

  22. The Homeland Security Blog: DHS Reorienting around Resilience (2010), http://www.thehomelandsecurityblog.com/2010/04/23/dhs-reorienting-around-resilience/

  23. Hazard and Risk Analysis of Aircraft Collision with High-Rise Building, Russian-Dutch research project, suported by NWO (NL) and RFBR (RU) (2002-2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nato scientific publications (2012), http://www.nato.int/science/2012/scientific_publications.pdf

  25. Pasman, H., Kirillov, I.: Resilience of Cities to Terrorist and Threats: learning from 9/11 and further research issues. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C, Environmental Security. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kirillov, I.A., Klimenko, S.V.: Platos Atlantis Revisited: Risk-informed, Multi-Hazard Resilience of Built Environment via Cyber Worlds Sharing. In: 2010 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW), Singapore, October 20-22, pp. 445–450 (2010), 10.1109/CW.2010.38

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wybo, J.L.: Mastering risks of damage and risks of crisis: the role of organisational learning. International Journal of Emergency Management 2(1/2) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Commission Staff Working Paper, Risk Assessment and Mapping Guidelines for Disaster Management, Brussels, 1626 final (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. NIST and the World Trade Center (2011), http://wtc.nist.gov/

  30. ARMONIA: Assessing and Mapping Multiple Risks for Spatial Planning - project (2007), http://ec.europa.eu/research/environment/pdf/publications/fp6/natural_hazards//armonia.pdf

  31. MATRIX: New Multi-Hazard and Multi-Risk Assessment Methods for Europe (2010), http://matrix.gpi.kit.edu/downloads/Fact-sheet-matrix-general.pdf

  32. SMARTeST: Smart Resilience Technology, Systems and Tools (2009), http://www.citg.tudelft.nl/fileadmin/Faculteit/CiTG/Over_de_faculteit/Afdelingen/Afdeling_Waterbouwkunde/sectie_waterbouwkunde/people/personal/gelder/doc/SMARTest.pdf

  33. Delvosalle, C., Fievez, C., Pipart, A., Londiche, H., Debray, B.: Effect of Safety Systems on the Definition of Reference Accident Scenarios in Seveso Establishments. In: WP 1, ARAMIS Project (2004), http://mahb.jrc.it/fileadmin/ARAMIS/downloads/wp1/WP1_LP_04.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kirillov, I., Metcherin, S., Klimenko, S. (2013). Towards Multi-hazard Resilience as a New Engineering Paradigm for Safety and Security Provision of Built Environment. In: Gavrilova, M.L., Tan, C.J.K., Kuijper, A. (eds) Transactions on Computational Science XVIII. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7848. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38803-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38803-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38802-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38803-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics