Skip to main content

Relative Interval Analysis of Paging Algorithms on Access Graphs

  • Conference paper
Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8037))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Access graphs, which have been used previously in connection with competitive analysis and relative worst order analysis to model locality of reference in paging, are considered in connection with relative interval analysis. The algorithms LRU, FIFO, FWF, and FAR are compared using the path, star, and cycle access graphs. In this model, some of the expected results are obtained. However, although LRU is found to be strictly better than FIFO on paths, it has worse performance on stars, cycles, and complete graphs, in this model. We solve an open question from [Dorrigiv, López-Ortiz, Munro, 2009], obtaining tight bounds on the relationship between LRU and FIFO with relative interval analysis.

Supported in part by the Danish Council for Independent Research. Part of this work was carried out while the first and third authors were visiting the University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albers, S., Favrholdt, L.M., Giel, O.: On paging with locality of reference. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 70(2), 145–175 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Angelopoulos, S., Dorrigiv, R., López-Ortiz, A.: On the separation and equivalence of paging strategies. In: SODA 2007, pp. 229–237 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borodin, A., El-Yaniv, R.: Online Computation and Competitive Analysis. Cambridge University Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borodin, A., Irani, S., Raghavan, P., Schieber, B.: Competitive paging with locality of reference. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 50(2), 244–258 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyar, J., Favrholdt, L.M.: The relative worst order ratio for on-line algorithms. ACM Transactions on Algorithms 3(2), article No. 22 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boyar, J., Favrholdt, L.M., Larsen, K.S.: The relative worst order ratio applied to paging. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 73(5), 818–843 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Boyar, J., Gupta, S., Larsen, K.S.: Access graphs results for LRU versus FIFO under relative worst order analysis. In: Fomin, F.V., Kaski, P. (eds.) SWAT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7357, pp. 328–339. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Boyar, J., Gupta, S., Larsen, K.S.: Relative interval analysis of paging algorithms on access graphs, arXiv:1305.0669 (cs.DS) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boyar, J., Irani, S., Larsen, K.S.: A comparison of performance measures for online algorithms. In: Dehne, F., Gavrilova, M., Sack, J.-R., Tóth, C.D. (eds.) WADS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5664, pp. 119–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Chrobak, M., Noga, J.: LRU is better than FIFO. Algorithmica 23(2), 180–185 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Denning, P.J.: The working set model for program behaviour. Communications of the ACM 11(5), 323–333 (1968)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Denning, P.J.: Working sets past and present. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 6(1), 64–84 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dorrigiv, R., López-Ortiz, A.: A survey of performance measures for on-line algorithms. SIGACT News 36(3), 67–81 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dorrigiv, R., López-Ortiz, A., Munro, J.I.: On the relative dominance of paging algorithms. Theoretical Computer Science 410, 3694–3701 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Karlin, A.R., Manasse, M.S., Rudolph, L., Sleator, D.D.: Competitive snoopy caching. Algorithmica 3, 79–119 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Karlin, A.R., Phillips, S.J., Raghavan, P.: Markov paging. SIAM Journal on Computing 30(3), 906–922 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Koutsoupias, E., Papadimitriou, C.H.: Beyond competitive analysis. SIAM Journal on Computing 30(1), 300–317 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Sleator, D.D., Tarjan, R.E.: Amortized efficiency of list update and paging rules. Communications of the ACM 28(2), 202–208 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Young, N.: The k-server dual and loose competitiveness for paging. Algorithmica 11, 525–541 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Boyar, J., Gupta, S., Larsen, K.S. (2013). Relative Interval Analysis of Paging Algorithms on Access Graphs. In: Dehne, F., Solis-Oba, R., Sack, JR. (eds) Algorithms and Data Structures. WADS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8037. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40104-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40104-6_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40103-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40104-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics