Abstract
This paper investigates whether users’ aesthetic impressions about websites vary considerably across different domains. The assumption that aesthetic judgments about websites that belong to diverse domains are based on different visual design aspects has been investigated in three distinct studies in healthcare, tourism, and web design business. In these studies participants expressed their overall preference as well as their judgments on the constructs of visual appeal, perceived usability and novelty. In addition, descriptions about the test websites were obtained by expert panel and objective measures. Preference Mapping (PM), which is a data summarization and visualization technique, has been performed in each study. Attribute projection into the preference maps allowed for the identification of important driver of preference for each individual domain. Even though, visual appeal was the most important predictor of overall preference in all studies, appealing websites had different visual characteristics in each domain. Furthermore the importance of the evaluation constructs varied considerably among studies, indicating that aesthetic perceptions differed considerably across domains. These findings emphasize the need for flexible evaluation methods that can be used to identify important visual design factors within a specific website domain.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tractinsky, N., Katz, A.S., Ikar, D.: What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers 13(2), 127–145 (2000)
Schenkman, B.N., Jönsson, F.U.: Aesthetics and preferences of web pages. Behaviour & Information Technology 19(5), 367–377 (2000)
Lindgaard, G., Dudek, C., Sen, D., Sumegi, L., Noonan, P.: An exploration of relations between visual appeal, trustworthiness and perceived usability of homepages. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 18(1) (2011)
Lavie, T., Tractinsky, N.: Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 60(3), 269–298 (2004)
Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., Koller, F.: AttrakDiff: A questionnaire to measure perceived hedonic and pragmatic quality. Mensch & Computer. Interaktion in Bewegung (2003).
Moshagen, M., Thielsch, M.T.: Facets of visual aesthetics. Int. Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68(10), 689–709 (2010)
Roth, S.P., Schmutz, P., Pauwels, S.L., Bargas-Avila, J.A., Opwis, K.: Mental models for web objects: Where do users expect to find the most frequent objects in online shops, news portals, and company web pages? Interacting with Computers 22(2), 140–152 (2010)
Norman, D.: Some observations on mentai models. Mental Models 7, 7–14 (1983)
Tuch, A.N., Presslaber, E.E., Stöcklin, M., Opwis, K., Bargas-Avila, J.A.: The role of visual complexity and prototypicality regarding first impression of websites: Working towards understanding aesthetic judgments. Int. J. of Human-Computer Studies 70(11), 794–811 (2012)
Meullenet, J., Xiong, R., Findlay, C., Knovel: Multivariate and probabilistic analyses of sensory science problems. Wiley Online Library (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Papachristos, E., Avouris, N. (2013). The Influence of Website Category on Aesthetic Preferences. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013. INTERACT 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8117. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40483-2_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40483-2_31
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40482-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40483-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)