Skip to main content

Some Reflections on Privatization as a Means to Transform the Economic System: The Western Experience

  • Chapter
The Political Economy of Transformation

Part of the book series: Studies in Contemporary Economics ((CONTEMPORARY))

  • 25 Accesses

Abstract

The transformation of socio—economic systems is the outcome of complex changes in institutions and economic and non—economic variables. Transformation can take place in different ways (cf. Wagener 1993), provided that changes in various areas are mutually compatible, that other elements of the socioeconomic system adapt, and that barriers to change are overcome.

The research on which this paper is based was financially supported by the Department of Economics, University of Trento as a part of a research project on La privatizzazione: un’analisi economica delle motivazioni e delle conseguenze (Privatization: An economic analysis of motivations and consequences). The author thanks Luisa Segnana (University of Lecce), Vittorio Valli (University of Turin), Hans-Jürgen Wagener (University of Groningen) and the participants in the Fourth Colloquium on Transformation, Werner-Reimers-Stiftung, Bad Homburg, for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. However, responsibility for all contents of the paper rests solely with the author.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acocella, N., 1989, “Le privatizzazioni in Italia”, Econornia pubblica 12:615–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alt, J. and K. Shepsle (eds.), 1990, Perspectives in Positive Political Economy,Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreff, W., 1992, “French Privatization Techniques and Experience: A Model for Central–Eastern Europe?”, in: F. Targetti (ed.), 1992: 135–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselmi, L. (ed.), 1990, Il sistema delle partecipazioni statali. Analisi delle condizioni di equilibrio,Turin, Giappichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J., 1967, “Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis”, American Economic Review,June: 415–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J., J.C. Panzar and R.D. Willig, 1982, Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure, New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, M., 1979, “Public Sector Growth: A Real Perspective”, Public Finance,3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beesley, M., S. Littlechild, 1983, “Privatization: Principles, Problems and Priorities”, Lloyds Bank Review,July: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcherding, T.E., W.W. Pommerehne and F. Schneider, 1982, “Comparing the Efficiency of Private and Public Production: The Evidence from Five Countries”, Zeitschrift fĂĽr Nationalökonomie,Suppl. 2: 127–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M. (ed.), 1989, Comparative Economic Systems. Models and Cases, 6th ed., Homewood, IL., Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bös, D., 1991, Privatization. A Theoretical Treatment, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A., 1989, “The Growth of Competitive Governments”, Canadian Journal of Economics, November, 4: 717–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caffè, F., 1984, Lezioni di politica economica, Turin, Bollati Boringhieri, 4. ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruba, S. and D. Da Empoli (eds.), 1979, La scuola di Public Choice. Costi della politica e controllo democratico, Turin, Fondazione Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, E., 1859, “Research of Different Principles of Legislation and Administration within the Field of Science”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 22: 381–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R., 1960, “The Problem of Social Cost”, Journal of Law and Economics, October: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daintith, T., 1991, Techniques of Privatization: A Comparative Law Perspective, paper presented at the conference on “International Privatization: Strategies and Practices”, St. Andrews, Scotland, 12–14 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H., 1968, “Why Regulate Utilities”, Journal of Law and Economics, April: 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. and A.A. Tait, 1988, The Growth of Government Expenditure: A Review of Quantitative Analysis, IMF Working Papers, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domberger, S. and J. Piggott, 1986, “Privatization Policies and Public Enterprise: A Survey”, The Economic Record, June: 145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D.A., 1986, “Privatization: An Interpretative Essay”, Australian Economic Papers, December: 147–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J.A., 1987, “Introduction: Public Ownership, Public Regulation or Public Subsidy?”, European Economic Review, February–March: 343–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J.A., 1989, “La privatizzazione nel Regno Unito”, Economia pubblica, 3: 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J.A. and D.J. Thompson, 1986, “Privatization: A Policy in Search of a Rational”, The Economic Journal, March: 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, A.O., 1974, “The Political Economy of a Rent Seeking Society”, American Economic Review, 3: 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkey, P., C. Stolp and M. Winer, 1981, “Theorizing about the Growth and Government”, Journal of Public Policy, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H., 1966, “Allocative Efficiency Vs. X–Efliciency”, American Economic Review, 3: 392–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R.G., and K. Lancaster, 1956, “The General Theory of Second Best”, Review of Economic Studies: 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marer, P. and S. Zecchini (eds.), 1991, The Transition to a Market Economy,OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts, 1990, “Bargaining Costs, Influence Costs and the Organization of Economic Activity”, in: J. Alt and K. Shepsle (eds.), 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millward, R., 1982, “The Comparative Performance of Public and Private Ownership”, in: E. Roll (ed.), 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • MT, 1992, Libro verde sulle partecipazioni dello stato, Ministero del Tesoro, Direzione Generale del Tesoro, Rome, November (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D., 1987, “The Growth of Government”, IMF Staff Papers, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K., A. Shleifer and R. Vishny, 1989, “Income Distribution, Market Size and Industrialization”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieri, M., 1990, in: L. Anselmi, 1990: 243–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M., 1965, The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M., 1982, The Rise and Decline of Nations. Economic Growth, Stagflation and Social Rigidities, New Haven, Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. and G. Tabellini, 1990, Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? Theory and Evidence, CEPR, NBER Discussion Papers, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pica, F., 1987, Economia pubblica, Turin, UTET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, F.L., 1973, Property and Industrial Organization in Communist and Capitalist Nations, Bloomington, Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, E. (ed.), 1982, The Mixed Economy, Londra, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santagata, W. (ed.), 1991, Offerta privatadi beni pubblici, Bologna, Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sappington, D.E. and J. Stiglitz, 1987, “Privatization, Information, Incentives”, Journal of Political Analysis and Management, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M., 1980, Industrial Market Structure andEconomic Performance, Chicago, Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, A.M., 1987, The Cycles of American History, London, AndrĂ© Deutsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segnana, M.L., 1991, Public—Private Relationships and Privatization Processes in Italy, Paper prepared for the Research Project on Accounting for HPEs in Transition: System—Related Issues in Measuring Economic Performance, Washington, D.C., The World Bank, Socio—Economic Data Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton, J.R., 1984, “Privatization: The Case Examined”, in: M. Bornsein, 1989: 110–123 (originally in: National Westminster Bank Quarterly Review, May: 59–71).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. et al., 1988, The Economic Role of the State, ed. by A. Heertje, Oxford, Basil Blackwell and Bank Insinger de Beaufort NV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Targetti, F. (ed.), 1992, Privatization in Europe. West and East Experiences, Aldershot, Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiemeyer, T., 1986, “Privatization: On the many Senses in Which this Word is Used in an International Discussion on Economic Theory”, in: T. Thiemeyer, and G. Quaden, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiemeyern. T. and G. Quaden (eds.), 1986, The Privatization of Public Enterprises: A European Debate, CIRIEC (Annals of Public and Co–operative Economy, Special Issue), Liege.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G., 1967, “The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies and Theft”, Western Economic Journal, 5: 224–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, J. and G. Yarrow, 1988, Privatization: An Economic Analysis, Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagener, H.J., 1993, “Some Theory of Systemic Change and Transformation”, in: H.J. Wagener (ed.), On the Theory and Policy of Systemic Change, Heidelberg, Physica Verlag: 1–20.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank, 1988, Techniques of Privatization of State—Owned Enterprises, 3 Vol., Washington, D.C., The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarrow, G., 1986, “Privatization in Theory and Practice”, Economic Policy, 2: 324–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamagni, S., 1991, ll rapporto tra statoe mercato e la teoria dell’intervento pubblico: unriesame critico, Bologna, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, UniversitĂ  degli Studi di Bologna, Working Paper No. 109.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dallago, B. (1994). Some Reflections on Privatization as a Means to Transform the Economic System: The Western Experience. In: Wagener, HJ. (eds) The Political Economy of Transformation. Studies in Contemporary Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52404-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52404-2_7

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0738-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-52404-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics